Sen’s Economics in The Idea of Justice: Induction vs Deduction

References

• Bruni, L. 2004. ‘The “Happiness Transformation Problem” in the Cambridge Tradition.’ The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 11 (3): 433–451. doi: 10.1080/0967256042000246494
   Google Scholar
• Carabelli, A. M. 1988. On Keynes’s Method. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, J. 1996. The Claims of Common Sense: Moore, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comim, F. 2002. ‘The Scottish Tradition in Economics and the Role of Common Sense in Adam Smith’s Thought.’ Review of Political Economy 14 (1): 91–114. doi: 10.1080/09538250120102787
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, D. A. 1992. ‘Functioning and Capability: The Foundations of Sen’s and Nussbaum’s Development Ethic.’ Political Theory 20 (4): 584–612. doi: 10.1177/0090591792020004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobb, M. 1937. Political Economy and Capitalism. London: G. Routledge & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dobb, M. 1973. Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ege, R., H. Igersheim, and C. Le Chapelain. 2016. ‘Transcendental vs. Comparative Approaches to Justice: A Reappraisal to Sen’s Dichotomy.’ European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (4): 521–543. doi: 10.1080/09672567.2014.916734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, D. 1976. ‘Introduction to the English Translation.’ In The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, edited by T. W. Adorno, H. Albert, R. Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, and K. R. Popper and translated by G. Adey and D. Frisby. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. 2008. ‘From “Hume’s Law” to Problem- and Policy-Analysis for Human Development. Sen after Dewey, Myrdal, Streeten, Stretton and Haq.’ Review of Political Economy 20 (2): 233–256. doi: 10.1080/09538250701819701
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited and translated by Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith. London: Laurence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. 2001. Reflection Without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, G. C. 2003. ‘Cambridge Economic Tradition.’ In The Elgar Companion to Post Keynesian Economics, edited by J. E. King. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, G. C. 2012. ‘Keynes and his Cambridge Pupils and Colleagues.’ Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics 1: 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, G. C., and G. Mongiovi. 2001. ‘The Cambridge Tradition in Economics: An Interview with G. C. Harcourt.’ Review of Political Economy 13 (4): 503–521. doi: 10.1080/09538250120099980
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. 1992a. Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. 1992b. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. N. [1890] 1930. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1921. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D., and N. Salvadori. 2005. ‘Representing the Production and Circulation of Commodities in Material Terms: On Sraffa’s Objectivism.’ Review of Political Economy 17 (3): 413–441. doi: 10.1080/09538250500147189
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2003. Reorienting Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, H. 2010. ‘Methodology Before Friedman.’ In Economic Methodology: Understanding Economics as a Science, edited by M. Boumans and J. B. Davis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. 1990. ‘Mengerian Economics in Realist Perspective.’ History of Political Economy 22 (Annual Supplement): 289–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. 1997. ‘Universals and the Methodenstreit: A Re-examination of Carl Menger’s Conception of Economics as an Exact Science.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (3): 475–495. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(96)00011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, M. 2005. ‘Sraffa and Wittgenstein: Physicism and Constructivism.’ Review of Political Economy 17 (3): 381–406. doi: 10.1080/09538250500147114
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. [1890] 1920. Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, N. 2006. ‘Capabilities as Causal Powers.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 30: 671–685. doi: 10.1093/cje/bel012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, N. 2007a. ‘Ethics, Ontology and Capabilities.’ Review of Political Economy 19 (1): 37–53. doi: 10.1080/09538250601080768
   Google Scholar
• Martins, N. 2007b. ‘Realism, Universalism and Capabilities.’ Review of Social Economy 65 (3): 253–278. doi: 10.1080/00346760701635817
   Google Scholar
• Martins, N. O. 2009. ‘Sen’s Capability Approach and Post-Keynesianism: Similarities, Distinctions, and the Cambridge Tradition.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 31 (4): 691–706. doi: 10.2753/PKE0160-3477310409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, N. 2011. ‘The Revival of Classical Political Economy and the Cambridge Tradition: From Scarcity Theory to Surplus Theory.’ Review of Political Economy 23 (1): 111–131. doi: 10.1080/09538259.2010.510319
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1887. Capital. Vol. I, 1867; English translation. London: Sonnenschein.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2003. ‘Tragedy and Human Capabilities: A Response to Vivian Walsh.’ Review of Political Economy 15 (3): 413–418. doi: 10.1080/09538250308435
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L. L. 2005. ‘The Cambridge School of Keynesian Economics.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 837–848. doi: 10.1093/cje/bei073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, S., and G. Summerfield. 2000. ‘The Economic Contributions of Amartya Sen.’ Review of Political Economy 12 (1): 89–113. doi: 10.1080/095382500106830
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 2003. ‘For Ethics and Economics Without the Dichotomies.’ Review of Political Economy 15 (3): 395–412. doi: 10.1080/09538250308432
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H., and V. Walsh. 2007. ‘Facts, Theories, Values and Distribution in the Works of Sir Partha Dasgupta.’ Review of Political Economy 19 (2): 181–202. doi: 10.1080/09538250701256748
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, J. 2012. ‘Causation in the Sciences: An Inferentialist Account.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 769–777. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.05.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reiss, J. 2014. ‘Struggling Over the Soul of Economics: Objectivity Versus Expertise.’ In Experts and Consensus in Social Science, edited by C. Martini and M. Boumans. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, T. K. 1989. Keynes’s Lectures, 1932-35: Notes of a Representative Student. Basingstoke: Macmillan in Association with the Royal Economic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1978. ‘On the Labour Theory of Value: Some Methodological Issues.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 2: 175–190. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1980. ‘Description as Choice.’ Oxford Economic Papers 32 (3): 353–369. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1987. ‘Dobb, Maurice Herbert.’ In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Vol. 1, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1993a. ‘Capability and Well-being.’ In The Quality of Life, edited by M. Nussbaum and A. Sen. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1993b. ‘Positional Objectivity.’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 22 (2): 126–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2003. ‘Sraffa, Wittgenstein, and Gramsci.’ Journal of Economic Literature 41 (4): 1240–1255. doi: 10.1257/jel.41.4.1240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2004. ‘Elements of a Theory of Human Rights.’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (4): 315–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2005. ‘Walsh on Sen After Putnam.’ Review of Political Economy 17 (1): 107–113. doi: 10.1080/0953825042000313834
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. 2000. ‘Smith After Sen.’ Review of Political Economy 12 (1): 5–25. doi: 10.1080/095382500106795
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. 2003. ‘Sen After Putnam.’ Review of Political Economy 15 (3): 315–394. doi: 10.1080/09538250308434
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. 2008. ‘Freedom, Values and Sen: Towards a Morally Enriched Classical Economic Theory.’ Review of Political Economy 20 (2): 199–232. doi: 10.1080/09538250701819677
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. [1953] 1963. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar