Environmental and Societal Attitudes to Working Hours in Gendered Perspective: Patterns, Preferences and Policy

References

• Abdul-Muhmin, A. 2007. ‘Explaining Consumers' Willingness to be Environmentally Friendly.’ International Journal Of Consumer Studies 31 (3): 237–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00528.x
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1977. ‘Attitude-behavior Relations: a Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research.’ Psychological Bulletin 84: 888–918. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annesley, C. 2007. ‘Women's Political Agency and Welfare Reform: Engendering the Adult Worker Model.’ Parliamentary Affairs 60 (3): 452–466. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsm018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester, L. 2010. ‘Determining the Economic-Environment Relation: a Regulationist Approach.’ International Journal of Green Economics 4 (1): 17–42. doi: 10.1504/IJGE.2010.032599
   Google Scholar
• Coote, A., J. Franklin, and A. Simms. 2010. 21 Hours: Why a Shorter Working Week Can Help Us All to Flourish in the 21st Century. London: New Economics Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, J., ed. 2003. Take Back Your Time: Fighting Overwork and Time Poverty in America. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Devetter, F., and S. Rousseau. 2011. ‘Working Hours and Sustainable Development.’ Review of Social Economy 69 (3): 333–355. doi: 10.1080/00346764.2011.563507
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, A., I. Buck, B. Hayward, and T. Jackson. 2012. ‘Time, Gender and Carbon: A Study of the Carbon Implications of British Adults' use of Time.’ Ecological Economics 84: 153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIGE Publication. 2012. Gender Equality and Climate Change - Review of the Implementation in the EU of Area K of the Beijing Platform for Action: Women and the Environment. Belgium: European Institute for Gender Equality.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, D. 2016. ‘Plan F: Feminist Plan for a Caring and Sustainable Economy.’ Globalizations 13 (6): 919–921. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2016.1156320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESS. 2010. European Social Survey Round 5 Data: Data file edition 3.3. Norway: Norwegian Centre for Research Data.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. ‘Mainstreaming Sustainable Development into EU Policies: 2009 Review of the European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development.’ European Commission. Accessed June 21, 2018. http://aei.pitt.edu/42725/1/COM_(2009)_400_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fudge, S., and M. Peters. 2011. ‘Behaviour Change in the UK Climate Debate: an Assessment of Responsibility, Agency and Political Dimensions.’ Sustainability 3 (6): 789–808. doi: 10.3390/su3060789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, S., A. Shirom, Y. Fried, and C. Cooper. 2008. ‘A Meta-Analysis of Work Demand Stressors and job Performance: Examining Main and Moderating Effects.’ Personnel Psychology 61 (2): 227–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Footprint Network. 2016. ‘National Footprint Accounts 2016.’ Global Footprint Network. Accessed April 28, 2017. http://www.footprintstandards.org.
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, C. 2000. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, A. 1999. Sharing the Work, Sparing the Planet: Work Time, Consumption and Ecology. London; New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, A., and J. M. Shandra. 2009. ‘Hours of Work and the Ecological Footprint of Nations: An Exploratory Analysis.’ Local Environment 14 (6): 575–600. doi: 10.1080/13549830902904185
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, C. 2015. Capitalism and the Political Economy of Work Time. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hertwich, E. G. 2005. ‘Life Cycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption: a Critical Review.’ Environmental Science and Technology 39: 4673–4684. doi: 10.1021/es0497375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. ‘Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.’ IPCC. Accessed June 21, 2018. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, C., G. Lynne, and B. Johnson. 2006. ‘Recycling as a Reflection of Balanced Self-Interest: A Test of the Metaeconomics Approach.’ Environment and Behavior 38 (3): 333–355. doi: 10.1177/0013916505279043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaJeunesse, R. 2009. Work Time Regulation as Sustainable Full Employment Strategy: The Social Effort Bargain. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. 1992. ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes.’ Journal of European Social Policy 2 (3): 159–173. doi: 10.1177/095892879200200301
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol.1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• McRae, S. 2003. ‘Constraints and Choices in Mothers’ Employment Careers: a Consideration of Hakim’s Preference Theory.’ British Journal of Sociology 54 (3): 317–338. doi: 10.1080/0007131032000111848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nässén, J., and J. Larsson. 2015. ‘Would Shorter Working Time Reduce Greenhouse gas Emissions? An Analysis of Time use and Consumption in Swedish Households.’ Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33: 726–745. doi: 10.1068/c12239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Greening Household Behaviour: The Role of Public Policy. OECD. Accessed June 21, 2018. http://www.oecd.org/env/consumption-innovation/greening-household-behaviour-2011.htm.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, B. 1993. Working Harder Isn’t Working: How we Can Save the Environment, the Economy and our Sanity by Working Less and Enjoying Life More. Vancouver: New Star.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R., and D. Elson. 2015. ‘Transcending the Impact of the Financial Crisis in the United Kingdom: Towards Plan F—a Feminist Economic Strategy.’ Feminist Review 109 (1): 8–30. doi: 10.1057/fr.2014.42
   Google Scholar
• Philp, B., G. Slater, and D. Wheatley. 2015. ‘New Labour and Work-Time Regulation: a Marxian Analysis of the UK Economy.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (3): 711–732. doi: 10.1093/cje/beu057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, B., and D. Wheatley. 2011. ‘Time use, Exploitation, and the Dual-Career Household: Competing Perspectives.’ American Journal of Economics and Sociology 70 (3): 587–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M., A. Vocino, S. Grau, R. Garma, and A. Ferdous. 2012. ‘The Impact of General and Carbon-Related Environmental Knowledge on Attitudes and Behaviour of US Consumers.’ Journal of Marketing Management 28 (3-4): 238–263. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2012.659279
   Google Scholar
• Pullinger, M. 2011. ‘Greening Our Working Lives: The Environmental Impacts of Changing Patterns of Paid Work in the UK and the Netherlands, and Implications for Working Time Policy.’ PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Pullinger, M. 2014. ‘Working Time Reduction Policy in a Sustainable Economy: Criteria and Options for its Design.’ Ecological Economics 103: 11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å Persson, F. Chapin, E. Lambin, T. Lenton, et al. 2009. ‘Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity.’ Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32. doi: 10.5751/ES-03180-140232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnick, D., and M. Weisbrot. 2007. ‘Are Shorter Work Hours Good for the Environment? A Comparison of U.S. and European Energy Consumption.’ International Journal of Health Services 37 (3): 405–417. doi: 10.2190/D842-1505-1K86-9882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanne, C. 2002. ‘Willing Consumers-or Locked-in? Policies for a Sustainable Consumption.’ Ecological Economics 42 (1–2): 273–287. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00086-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, F., G. Kallis, and J. Martinez-Alier. 2010. ‘Crisis or Opportunity? Economic Degrowth for Social Equity and Ecological Sustainability.’ Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (6): 511–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor, J. 1991. ‘Global Inequality and Environmental Crisis: an Argument for Reducing Working Hours in the North.’ World Development 19 (1): 73–84. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90039-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor, J. 2005a. ‘Prices and Quantities: Unsustainable Consumption and the Global Economy.’ Ecological Economics 55 (3): 309–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor, J. 2005b. ‘Sustainable Consumption and Worktime Reduction.’ Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 (1): 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., S. Wang, and Q. Yang. 2010. ‘Climate Change and Global Warming.’ Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 9 (2): 99–102. doi: 10.1007/s11157-010-9206-7
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, C. 2007. Work Time and Global Warming. Berkeley: Preservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, D. 2015. ‘Developing an Understanding of Meaningful Work in Economics: the Case for a Heterodox Economics of Work.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 39 (3): 675–688. doi: 10.1093/cje/beu074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. 2006. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of State. 2017. Communication Regarding Intent To Withdraw From Paris Agreement. US State Department. Accessed June 21, 2018. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2017/08/273050.htm.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 1980. ‘A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.’ Econometrica 48 (4): 817–838. doi: 10.2307/1912934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L. 2009. ‘Behavioural Responses to Climate Change: Asymmetry of Intentions and Impacts.’ Journal of Environmental Psychology 29 (1): 13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar