Surplus Value Production and Realization in Marxian Theory – Applications to the U.S., 1990–2015

References

• Basu, D., and D. K. Foley. 2013. ‘Dynamics of Output and Employment in the U.S. Economy.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 37 (5): 1077–1106. doi: 10.1093/cje/bes088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis). 2017. GDP by Industry. U.S. Department of Commerce. Accessed August 9, 2017. http://www.bea.gov.
   Google Scholar
• BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2017. Employment, Hours, and Earnings. U.S. Department of Labor. Accessed August 9, 2017. http://www.bls.gov/data/.
   Google Scholar
• Cogliano, J. F. 2011. ‘Smith’s “Perfect Liberty” and Marx’s Equalized Rate of Surplus-Value.’ Department of Economics, The New School for Social Research. WP N. 08/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cogliano, J. F. 2013. ‘New Directions in Political Economy: Value Theory, Agent-Based Computational Modeling, and the Dynamics of Labor Mobility.’ Ph.D. thesis, New School for Social Research, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Cogliano, J. F., P. Flaschel, R. Franke, N. Fröhlich, and R. Veneziani. 2018. Value, Competition and Exploitation: Marx’s Legacy Revisited. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cogliano, J. F., R. Veneziani, and N. Yoshihara. 2016. ‘The Dynamics of Exploitation and Class in Accumulation Economies.’ Metroeconomica 67 (2): 242–290. doi: 10.1111/meca.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duménil, G. 1980. De la Valuer aux Prix de Production. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Duménil, G. 1984. ‘The So-Called “Transformation Problem” Revisited: A Brief Comment.’ Journal of Economic Theory 33 (2): 340–348. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(84)90095-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duménil, G., and D. Lévy. 2002. ‘The Field of Capital Mobility and the Gravitation of Profit Rates (USA 1948-2000).’ Review of Radical Political Economics 34 (4): 417–436.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D. K. 1982. ‘The Value of Money the Value of Labor Power and the Marxian Transformation Problem.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 14 (2): 37–47. doi: 10.1177/048661348201400204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, D. K. 1986. Understanding Capital. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D. K. 2000. ‘Recent Developments in the Labor Theory of Value.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 32 (1): 1–39. doi: 10.1177/048661340003200101
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D. K. 2005. ‘Marx’s Theory of Money in Historical Perspective.’ In Marx‘s Theory of Money, edited by F. Moseley, 36–49. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D. K. 2011a. ‘The Long-Period Method and Marx’s Theory of Value.’ In The Evolution of Economic Theory: Essays in Honour of Bertram Schefold, edited by V. Caspari, 15–38. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D. K. 2011b. ‘The Political Economy of U.S. Output and Employment 2001-2010.’ Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA). WP N. 2011-5.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D. K. 2013. ‘Rethinking Financial Capitalism and the “Information” Economy.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 45 (3): 257–268. doi: 10.1177/0486613413487154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1970. ‘Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution.’ Review of Economic Studies 37 (3): 407–436. doi: 10.2307/2296729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1976. ‘On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution: A Comment on Samuelson.’ In Essays in Modern Capital Theory, edited by M. Brown, K. Sato, and P. Zarembka, 25–45. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1984. ‘Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx.’ Oxford Economic Papers 36 (2): 291–325. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, M. 1985. ‘Monopoly or Competition in the U.S. Economy?’ Review of Radical Political Economics 17 (4): 121–127. doi: 10.1177/048661348501700408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. M., R. Edwards, and M. Reich. 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. Capital: Volume I. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1978. Capital: Volume II. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1981. Capital: Volume III. New York, NY: Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Mohun, S. 1994. ‘A Re(in)Statement of the Labor Theory of Value.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 18 (4): 391–412. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohun, S. 2004. ‘The Labour Theory of Value as Foundation for Empirical Investigations.’ Metroeconomica 55 (1): 65–95. doi: 10.1111/j.0026-1386.2004.00183.x
   Google Scholar
• Mohun, S. 2006. ‘Distributive Shares in the US Economy, 1964-2001.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (3): 347–370. doi: 10.1093/cje/bei065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohun, S. 2013. ‘Rate of Profit and Crisis in the US Economy: A Class Perspective.’ In Social Fairness and Economics: Economics Essays in the Spirit of Duncan Foley, edited by L. Taylor, A. Rezai, and T. Michl, 171–198. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mohun, S. 2014. ‘Unproductive Labor in the U.S. Economy 1964-2010.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 46 (3): 355–379. doi: 10.1177/0486613413506080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohun, S., and R. Veneziani. 2017. ‘Value, Price, and Exploitation: the Logic of the Transformation Problem.’ Journal of Economic Surveys 31 (5): 1387–1420. doi: 10.1111/joes.12223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morishima, M., and F. Seton. 1961. ‘Aggregation in Leontief Matrices and the Labour Theory of Value.’ Econometrica 29 (2): 203–220. doi: 10.2307/1909289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, F. 1985. ‘The Rate of Surplus Value in the Postwar US Economy: a Critique of Weisskopf’s Estimates.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 9 (1): 57–79. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, F. 1986. ‘Estimates of the Rate of Surplus-Value in the Postwar United States Economy.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 18 (1-2): 168–189. doi: 10.1177/048661348601800108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, F. 1988. ‘The Increase of Unproductive Labor in the Postwar U.S. Economy.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 20 (2-3): 100–106. doi: 10.1177/048661348802000216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley, F. 1990. ‘The Decline of the Rate of Profit in the Postwar U.S. Economy: An Alternative Marxian Explanation.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 22 (2-3): 17–37. doi: 10.1177/048661349002200202
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, F. 1991. The Falling Rate of Profit in the Postwar United States Economy. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, F. 1997. ‘The Rate of Profit and the Future of Capitalism.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 29 (4): 23–41. doi: 10.1177/048661349702900403
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, F. 2011. ‘Recent Interpretations of the “Transformation Problem”.’ Rethinking Marxism 23 (2): 186–197. doi: 10.1080/08935696.2011.558752
   Google Scholar
• Paitaridis, D., and L. Tsoulfidis. 2012. ‘The Growth of Unproductive Activities, the Rate of Profit, and the Phase-Change of the U.S. Economy.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 44 (2): 213–233. doi: 10.1177/0486613411423899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panico, C. 1980. ‘Marx’s Analysis of the Relationship between the Rate of Interest and the Rate of Profits.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 4 (4): 363–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panico, C. 1988. Interest and Profit in the Theories of Value and Distribution. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panico, C., and A. Pinto. 2018. ‘Income Inequality and the Financial Industry.’ Metroeconomica 69 (1): 39–59. doi: 10.1111/meca.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricardo, D. 1951. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in 2004 by Liberty Fund, Inc., Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. E. 1982. A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharfenaker, E., and G. Semieniuk. 2017. ‘A Statistical Equilibrium Approach to the Distribution of Profit Rates.’ Metroeconomica 68 (3): 465–499. doi: 10.1111/meca.12134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmler, W. 1981. ‘Competition, Monopoly, and Differentials of Profit Rates: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 13 (4): 39–52. doi: 10.1177/048661348201300405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmler, W. 1984. Competition, Monopoly, and Differential Profit Rates. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh, A. 2016. Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh, A., and E. A. Tonak. 1994. Measuring the Wealth of Nations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skillman, G. L. 1995. ‘Ne Hic Saltaveris: The Marxian Theory of Exploitation after Roemer.’ Economics and Philosophy 11 (2): 309–331. doi: 10.1017/S0266267100003412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillman, G. L. 2014. ‘Capitalist Exploitation without Capitalist Production: The Consequences of Imperfect Contracting.’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 26 (4): 629–652. doi: 10.1177/0951629813511551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skillman, G. L. 2017. ‘Marx’s Capital Through the Lens of Roemer’s General Theory (and Vice-Versa).’ Social Choice and Welfare 49 (3-4): 423–443. doi: 10.1007/s00355-017-1072-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. [1776] 2000. The Wealth of Nations. New York, NY: Random House, Inc. Modern Library Edition. Originally published in 1776 as: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Veneziani, R. 2007. ‘Exploitation and Time.’ Journal of Economic Theory 132 (1): 189–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneziani, R. 2013. ‘Exploitation, Inequality, and Power.’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 25 (4): 526–545. doi: 10.1177/0951629813477275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneziani, R., and N. Yoshihara. 2012. ‘Profits and Exploitation: A Reappraisal.’ Advances in Mathematical Economics 16: 85–109. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-54114-1_4
   Google Scholar
• Veneziani, R., and N. Yoshihara. 2013. ‘Exploitation of Labour and Exploitation of Commodities: A “New Interpretation”.’ Review of Radical Political Economics 45 (4): 517–524. doi: 10.1177/0486613405280809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneziani, R., and N. Yoshihara. 2015. ‘Exploitation in Economies with Heterogeneous Preferences, Skills and Assets: An Axiomatic Approach.’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 27 (1): 8–33. doi: 10.1177/0951629814538911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneziani, R., and N. Yoshihara. 2017. ‘One Million Miles to Go: Taking the Axiomatic Road to Defining Exploitation.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (6): 1607–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshihara, N. (2010). ‘Class and Exploitation in General Convex Cone Economies.’ Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 75(2): 281–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshihara, N. 2017. ‘A Progress Report on Marxian Economic Theory: On the Controversies in Exploitation Theory since Okishio.’ Journal of Economic Surveys 31 (2): 632–659. doi: 10.1111/joes.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar