Kaldor 3.0: An Empirical Investigation of the Verdoorn-augmented Technical Progress Function

References

• Acemoglu, D. 2006. ‘A Simple Model of Inefficient Institutions.’ Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108 (4): 515–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., D. Dorn, G. H. Hanson, and B. Price. 2014. ‘Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in US Manufacturing.’ American Economic Review 104 (5): 394–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., C. Harris, P. Howitt, and J. Vickers. 2001. ‘Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-By-Step Innovation.’ Review of Economic Studies 68 (3): 467–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antenucci, F. 2018. ‘China Syndrome or Not? Labour Market Effects of a Greater Trade Openness in US Manufacturing.’ Department of Economics, University Roma Tre, Working Paper No. 0242.
   Google Scholar
• Apergis, N., and S. Zikos. 2003. ‘The Law of Verdoorn: Evidence from Greek Disaggregated Manufacturing Time Series Data.’ Economic and Social Review 34 (1): 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. 1962. ‘The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.’ Review of Economic Studies 29 (3): 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschauer, D. A. 1989. ‘Is Public Expenditure Productive?’ Journal of Monetary Economics 23 (2): 177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J. 2001. ‘Human Capital and Growth.’ American Economic Review 91 (2): 12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. 2004. Economic Growth. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bassanini, A., and E. Ernst. 2002. ‘Labour Market Regulation, Industrial Relations and Technological Regimes: A Tale of Comparative Advantage.’ Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (3): 391–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S. 1996. ‘Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (3): 719–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. 1990. ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive.’ Journal of Political Economy 98 (5, Part 1): 893–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S., K. M. Murphy, and R. Tamura. 1990. ‘Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth.’ Journal of Political Economy 98 (5, Part 2): S12–S37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. 2002. ‘A Reappraisal of Verdoorn’s Law for the Italian Economy (1951–1997).’ In Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on Verdoorn’s Law, edited by J. S. McCombie, M. Pugno, and B. Soro. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. 1962. ‘The Technical Progress Function and the Production Function.’ Economica 29 (114): 166–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borjas, G. J., R. B. Freeman, and L. F. Katz. 1992. ‘On the Labor Market Effects of Immigration and Trade.’ In Immigration and the Workforce: Economic Consequences for the United States and Source Areas, edited by G. J. Borjas, and R. B. Freeman. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R., and P. Petit. 1991. ‘Kaldor’s Growth Theories: Past, Present and Prospects for the Future.’ In Nicholas Kaldor and Mainstream Economics: Confrontation or Convergence?, edited by E. J. Nell, and W. Semmler. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castiglione, C. 2011. ‘Verdoorn-Kaldor’s Law: An Empirical Analysis with Time Series Data in the United States.’ Advances in Management and Applied Economics 1 (3): 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Cesaratto, S. 2015. ‘Neo-Kaleckian and Sraffian Controversies on the Theory of Accumulation.’ Review of Political Economy 27 (2): 154–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesaratto, S., F. Serrano, and A. Stirati. 2003. ‘Technical Change, Effective Demand and Employment.’ Review of Political Economy 15 (1): 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cette, G., S. Corde S, and R. Lecat. 2017. ‘Stagnation of Productivity in France: A Legacy of the Crisis or a Structural Slowdown?’ Economie et Statistique 494: 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, R. 2019. ‘Nicholas Kaldor on Adam Smith and Allyn Young.’ Review of Political Economy. issue 31 (3): 445–463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirinko, R. S. 1993. ‘Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications.’ Journal of Economic Literature 31 (4): 1875–1911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daveri, F., and M. L. Parisi. 2010. ‘Temporary Workers and Seasoned Managers as Causes of Low Productivity.’ Paper presented at the IFO, CESifo and OECD Conference on Regulation “Political Economy, Measurement and Effects on Performance”, Munich, 29–30 January 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Deleidi, M. 2018. ‘Post Keynesian Endogenous Money Theory: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Credit Demand Schedule.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 41 (2): 185–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleidi, M., and M. Mazzucato. 2019a. ‘Putting Austerity to Bed: Technical Progress, Aggregate Demand and the Supermultiplier.’ Review of Political Economy. issue 31 (3): 315–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleidi, M., and M. Mazzucato. 2019b. ‘Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment for the US Economy.’ Department of Economics, University Roma Tre, Working Paper No. 0248.
   Google Scholar
• Deleidi, M., W. Paternesi Meloni, L. Salvati, and F. Tosi. 2020. ‘Exploring the Determinants of Productivity Growth in Italian Regions: A Kaldorian Perspective.’ Associazione Studi e Ricerche Interdisciplinari sul Lavoro ASTRIL Working Papers No. 0051.
   Google Scholar
• Deleidi, M., W. Paternesi Meloni, and A. Stirati. 2019. ‘Tertiarization, Productivity and Aggregate Demand: Evidence-Based Policies for European Countries.’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s00191-019-00647-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., G. Fagiolo, and A. Roventini. 2010. ‘Schumpeter Meeting Keynes: A Policy-Friendly Model of Endogenous Growth and Business Cycles.’ Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34 (9): 1748–1767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enflo, K. 2010. ‘Productivity and Employment–Is There a Trade-Off? Comparing Western European Regions and American States 1950–2000.’ Annals of Regional Science 45: 401–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., and B. Verspagen. 2002. ‘Technology-Gaps, Innovation-Diffusion and Transformation: An Evolutionary Interpretation.’ Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1291–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. C., and G. H. Hanson. 1999. ‘The Impact of Outsourcing and High-Technology Capital on Wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979–1990.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3): 907–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe, J., and F. G. Adams. 2005. ‘“A Theory of Production” The Estimation of the Cobb-Douglas Function: A Retrospective View.’ Eastern Economic Journal 31 (3): 427–445.
   Google Scholar
• Felipe, J., and J. S. McCombie. 2014. ‘The Aggregate Production Function: ‘Not Even Wrong.’ Review of Political Economy 26 (1): 60–84.
   Google Scholar
• Foda, K. 2017. What’s Happening to Productivity Growth? Key Macro Trends and Patterns. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Forges Davanzati, G., R. Patalano, and G. Traficante. 2017. ‘The Italian Economic Stagnation in a Kaldorian Theoretical Framework.’ Economia Politica 36 (3): 841–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrisch, H. 2019. ‘The Productivity Puzzle and the Kaldor-Verdoorn Law: The Case of Central and Eastern Europe.’ Narodowy Bank Polski, Education & Publishing Department. Working Paper No. 318.
   Google Scholar
• Girardi, D., and R. Pariboni. 2018. ‘Autonomous Demand and the Investment Share.’ UMass Amherst Economics Working Papers No. 2018/18.
   Google Scholar
• Girardi, D., W. Paternesi Meloni, and A. Stirati. 2020. ‘Reverse Hysteresis? Persistent Effects of Autonomous Demand Expansions.' Cambridge Journal of Economics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/cje/beaa009.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. J., and I. Dew-Becker. 2008. ‘The Role of Labor Market Changes in the Slowdown of European Productivity Growth.’ NBER Working Paper No. 13840.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1993. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. I., and E. Lau. 1998. ‘Verdoorn’s Law and Increasing Returns to Scale in the UK Regions, 1968–91: Some New Estimates Based on the Cointegration Approach.’ Oxford Economic Papers 50 (2): 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. I., and A. Liu. 1999. ‘Verdoorn’s Law and Increasing Returns to Scale: Country Estimates Based on the Cointegration Approach.’ Applied Economics Letters 6 (1): 29–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, Y., and M. Vernengo. 2008. ‘Puzzles, Paradoxes, and Regularities: Cyclical and Structural Productivity in the United States (1950–2005).’ Review of Radical Political Economics 40 (3): 237–243.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, D. W., M. S. Ho, and K. J. Stiroh. 2008. ‘A Retrospective Look at the US Productivity Growth Resurgence.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (1): 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. 1957. ‘A Model of Economic Growth.’ Economic Journal 67 (268): 591–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. 1961. ‘Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth.’ In The Theory of Capital, edited by F. A. Lutz, and D. C. Hague. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. 1968. ‘Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industry: A Reply.’ Economica 35 (140): 385–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. 1972. ‘The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics.’ Economic Journal 82 (328): 1237–1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. 1975. ‘Economic Growth and the Verdoorn Law – A Comment on Mr Rowthorn’s Article.’ Economic Journal 85 (340): 891–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. 1985. Economics without Equilibrium. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N., and J. A. Mirrlees. 1962. ‘A New Model of Economic Growth.’ Review of Economic Studies 29 (3): 174–192.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. [1966] 1978. Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. Inaugural Lecture delivered at the University of Cambridge, November 2. In Further Essays on Economic Theory, collected economic essays by Nicholas Kaldor, 100–138. Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Khotari, S. P., J. Lewellen, and J. B. Warner. 2014. ‘The Behaviour of Aggregate Corporate Investment.’ MIT Sloan School, Research Paper No. 5112–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kilian, L., and H. Lütkepohl. 2017. Structural Vector Autoregressive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knell, M. 2004. ‘Structure Change and the Kaldor-Verdoorn Law in the 1990s.’ Revue D’Economie Industrielle 105 (1): 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., and R. R. Russell. 2002. ‘Technological Change, Technological Catch-Up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence.’ American Economic Review 92 (3): 527–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 1992. Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. number 275.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2014. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2016. ‘Convergence Towards the Normal Rate of Capacity Utilization in Neo-Kaleckian Models: The Role of Non-Capacity Creating Autonomous Expenditures.’ Metroeconomica 67 (1): 172–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2018. ‘Production Functions, the Kaldor-Verdoorn Law and Methodology.’ In Alternative Approaches in Macroeconomics, edited by P. Arestis. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. Z., and L. Edwards. 2013. US Employment Deindustrialization: Insights from History and the International Experience. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Policy Brief Number PB13-27, October.
   Google Scholar
• Lütkepohl, H. 2005. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin, DE: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Magacho, G. R., and J. S. McCombie. 2017. ‘Verdoorn’s Law and Productivity Dynamics: An Empirical Investigation Into the Demand and Supply Approaches.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 40 (4): 600–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2016. ‘From Market Fixing to Market-Creating: A New Framework for Innovation Policy.’ Industry and Innovation 23 (2): 140–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. 1982. ‘Economic Growth, Kaldor's Laws and the Static–Dynamic Verdoorn law Paradox.’ Applied Economics 14 (3): 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. 1983. ‘Kaldor’s Laws in Retrospect.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5 (3): 414–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. 1985. ‘Economic Growth, the Harrod Foreign Trade Multiplier and the Hicks’ Super-Multiplier.’ Applied Economics 17 (1): 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. 2002. ‘Increasing Returns and the Verdoorn Law from a Kaldorian Perspective.’ In Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on Verdoorn’s Law, edited by J. S. McCombie, M. Pugno, and B. Soro. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S., and J. R. De Ridder. 1984. ‘“The Verdoorn Law Controversy”: Some New Empirical Evidence Using US State Data.’ Oxford Economic Papers 36 (2): 268–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S., M. Pugno, and B. Soro. 2002. Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on Verdoorn’s Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S., and M. Roberts. 2007. ‘Returns to Scale and Regional Growth: The Static-Dynamic Verdoorn Law Paradox Revisited.’ Journal of Regional Science 47 (2): 179–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S., and M. R. Spreafico. 2015. ‘Kaldor’s ‘Technical Progress Function’ and Verdoorn’s law Revisited.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (4): 1117–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S., and A. P. Thirlwall. 1994. Economic Growth and the Balance of Payments Constraint. Basingstoke: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michl, T. R. 1985. ‘International Comparisons of Productivity Growth: Verdoorn’s Law Revisited.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 7 (4): 474–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millemaci, E., and F. Ofria. 2014. ‘Kaldor-Verdoorn’s Law and Increasing Returns to Scale: A Comparison Across Developed Countries.’ Journal of Economic Studies 41 (1): 140–162.
   Google Scholar
• Nah, W. J., and M. Lavoie. 2019. ‘Convergence in a Neo-Kaleckian Model with Endogenous Technical Progress and Autonomous Demand Growth.’ Review of Keynesian Economics 7 (3): 275–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti, G., and S. Scarpetta. 2003. ‘Regulation, Productivity and Growth: OECD Evidence.’ Economic Policy 18 (36): 9–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ofria, F. 2009. ‘L’approccio Kaldor-Verdoorn: Una Verifica Empirica per il Centro-Nord e il Mezzogiorno d’Italia (Anni 1951–2006).’ Rivista di Politica Economica 2009 (1): 179–207.
   Google Scholar
• Okun, A. M. 1962. ‘Potential GNP: Its Measurement and Significance’. In Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, 89–104. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. 1996. ‘Growth Theory in a Keynesian Mode: Some Keynesian Foundations for New Endogenous Growth Theory.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 19 (1): 113–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, A. 2015. ‘The Role of Aggregate Demand in Kaldor's Late Contributions to Economic Growth: A Reply.’ Review of Political Economy 27 (3): 450–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paniccià, R., P. Piacentini, and S. Prezioso. 2013. ‘Total Factor Productivity or Technical Progress Function? Post-Keynesian Insights for the Empirical Analysis of Productivity Differentials in Mature Economies.’ Review of Political Economy 25 (3): 476–495.
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgious, T. 2014. ‘Learning Your Comparative Advantages.’ Review of Economic Studies 81 (3): 1263–1295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariboni, R., and P. Tridico. 2019. ‘Structural Change, Institutions and the Dynamics of Labor Productivity in Europe.’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s00191-019-00641-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preenen, p. T., R. Vergeer, K. Kraan, and S. Dhondt. 2017. ‘Labour Productivity and Innovation Performance: The Importance of Internal Labour Flexibility Practices.’ Economic and Industrial Democracy 38 (2): 271–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2016. ‘Premature Deindustrialization.’ Journal of Economic Growth 21 (1): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, p. M. 1990. ‘Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evidence.’ Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 32 (1): 251–286.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, p. M. 1994. ‘The Origins of Endogenous Growth.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1): 3–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowthorn, R. E. 1975. ‘What Remains of Kaldor’s Law?’ Economic Journal 85 (337): 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Paul, G. 2000. The Political Economy of Labour Market Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoder, C. 2014. ‘Effective Demand, Exogenous Normal Utilization and Endogenous Capacity in the Long Run: Evidence from a Cointegrated Vector Autoregression Analysis for the USA.’ Metroeconomica 65 (2): 298–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setterfield, M. 1997. ‘‘History Versus Equilibrium’ and the Theory of Economic Growth.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 21 (3): 365–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, C. A., and T. Zha. 1999. ‘Error Bands for Impulse Responses.’ Econometrica 67 (5): 1113–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skott, P., and P. Auerbach. 1995. ‘Cumulative Causation and the “New” Theories of Economic Growth.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 17 (3): 381–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: printed for W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. 1956. ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 65–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilimbergo, M. A., M. S. A. Symansky, M. C. Cottarelli, and O. J. Blanchard. 2009. Fiscal Policy for the Crisis. International Monetary Fund, SPN/08/01, December 29.
   Google Scholar
• Stiroh, K. J. 2001. ‘What Drives Productivity Growth?’ FRBNY Economic Policy Review 7 (1): 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Szirmai, A., and B. Verspagen. 2015. ‘Manufacturing and Economic Growth in Developing Countries, 1950–2005.’ Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 34 (C): 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Thirlwall, A. P. 1983. ‘A Plain Man’s Guide to Kaldor’s Growth Laws.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5 (3): 345–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tridico, P., and R. Pariboni. 2018. ‘Inequality, Financialization, and Economic Decline.’ Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 41 (2): 236–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdoorn, P. J. (1949) 2002. ‘Factors that Determine the Growth of Labour Productivity.' In Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on Verdoorn’s Law, edited by J. S. McCombie, M. Pugno, and B. Soro. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verdoorn, p. J. 1956. ‘Complementarity and Long-Range Projections.’ Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society 24 (4): 429–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. A. 1928. ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.’ Economic Journal 38 (152): 527–542.
   Google Scholar