A Marxist Political Economy Retort to the ‘After the Washington Consensus'

References

• Amirahmadi, H. 1987. ‘The Non-Capitalist Way of Development.' Review of Radical Political Economics 19 (1): 22–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, R., and D. Clark. 1998. ‘Capitalism, Industrialisation and Development in Latin America: the Dependency Paradigm Revisited.' Capital & Class 22 (1): 89–118.
   Google Scholar
• Bellofiori, R. 1985. ‘Marx After Schumpeter.' Capital & Class 8 (3): 60–74.
   Google Scholar
• Birdsall, N., A. de la Torre, and R. Menezes. 2001. Washington Contentious. Economic Policies for Social Equity in Latin America. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Inter-American Dialogue.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. 1991. ‘‘Fin de Siecle: Socialism After the Crash’.' In After the Fall. The Failure of Communism and the Future of Socialism, edited by R. Blackburn, 173–249. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1996. ‘Efficient Redistribution: New Rules for Markets, States, and Communities.' Politics and Society 24 (4): 307–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracarense, N. 2013. ‘Contract Zones: Development Theory and the “Cultural Turn”.' Review of Radical Political Economics 45 (3): 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracarense, N. 2015. 'Core and Periphery in the Early Cold War: a Historical Analysis of Development Theory.' In Peripheral Visions of Economic Development: New Frontiers in Development Economics and the History of Economic Thought, edited by H.-M. Trautwein, and M. Garcia Molina, 15–46. Verlag: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brainerd, E. 1998. ‘Market Reform and Mortality in Transition Economies.' World Development 26 (11): 2013–2027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. M. 2018. ‘Regimes of Realization: Using Marx and Kalecki to Understand the US Economy, Including the Great Recession and the “Recovery”.' Review of Radical Political Economics 50 (4): 757–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucknall, K. B. 1997. ‘Why China has Done Better Than Russia Since 1989.' International Journal of Social Economics 24 (7/8/9): 1023–1037.
   Google Scholar
• Castellano, F. L., and F. Garcia-Quero. 2012. ‘Institutional Approaches to Economic Development: The Current Status of the Debate.' Journal of Economic Issues XLVI (4): 921–940.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, S., T. Dallery, and J. Marie. 2018. ‘Why Are Keynesian Multipliers Larger in Hard Times? A Palley-Aftalion-Pasinetti Explanation.' Review of Radical Political Economics 50 (4): 736–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H. 1989. ‘Close the IMF, Abolish Debt and end Development: a Class Analysis of the International Debt Crisis.' Capital & Class 13 (3): 17–50.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, R. 2020. ‘Marx’s Critical Political Economy, “Marxist Economics” and Actually Occurring Revolutions Against Capitalism.' Third World Quarterly 41 (8): 1353–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 1988. Democracy and Economic Planning: The Political Economy of a Self-Governing Society. Colorado: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, G., I. Szelényi, and E. Townsley. 1997. ‘The Theory of Post-Communist Managerialism.' New Left Review I (222): 60–92.
   Google Scholar
• Faille, D. D. 2011. ‘Discourse Analysis in International Development Studies: Mapping Some Contemporary Contributions.' Journal of Multicultural Discourses 6 (3): 215–235.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, R. E., S. Fischer, and C. Inglesias. 1990. 'Comment.' In Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?, edited by J. Williamson, 21–24. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Foster-Carter, A. 1973. ‘Neo-marxist Approaches to Development and Underdevelopment.' Journal of Contemporary Asia 3 (1): 6–33.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. G. 1989. ‘The Development of Underdevelopment.' Monthly Review 41 (2): 38–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaidar, Y. 2012. Russia: A Long View. Cambridge: Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gevorkyan, A. V. 2018. Transition Economies: Transformation, Development, and Society in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Oxon, UK & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gowan, P. 1995. ‘Neo-Liberal Theory and Practice for Eastern Europe.' New Left Review 213 (September/October): 3–60.
   Google Scholar
• Grabel, I. 2018. ‘Toward a Pluripolar Global Financial Architecture? The Bretton Woods Institutions and the New Landscape of Developmental Finance.' Review of Radical Political Economics 50 (4): 653–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. 1991. ‘The Role of Budget Deficits in Development Strategies.' Review of Radical Political Economics 23 (1&2): 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. T. 1993. ‘The Institution of Foreign Exchange Trading.' Journal of Economic Issues 27 (3): 679–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymer, S. H. 1972. The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven Development. Yale University: Economic Growth Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kentikelenis, A. E., T. H. Stubbs, and L. P. King. 2016. ‘IMF Conditionality and Development Policy Space, 1985–2014.' Review of International Political Economy 23 (4): 543–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodko, G. W. 1999. ‘Transition to a Market Economy and Sustained Growth. Implications for the Post-Washington Consensus.' Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32 (3): 233–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 2000. ‘. ‘How Complicated Does the Model Have to be?' ’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 16 (4): 33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczynski, P. P., and J. Williamson. 2003. After the Washington Consensus. Washington DC: Institute for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lampa, R. 2021. ‘Capital Flows to Latin America (2003–17): A Critical Survey from Prebisch’s Business Cycle Theory.' Review of Political Economy 33 (1): 103–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippit, V. D. 1988. ‘Class Structure, Modes of Production and Economic Development.' Review of Radical Political Economics 20 (2&3): 18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, E. 1962. Marxist Economic Theory, Volume 1. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandle, J. 2012. ‘Marxist Analyses and Capitalist Development in the Third World.' Theory and Society 9 (6): 865–876.
   Google Scholar
• Marangos, J. 2001. ‘International Trade Policies for Transition Economies: the Post Keynesian Alternative.' Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23 (4): 689–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangos, J. 2002. ‘Alternative Methods of Institutional Development for Transition Economies.' Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 158 (3): 483–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangos, J. 2006. ‘Was Market Socialism a Feasible Alternative for Transition Economies?' ’ International Journal of Political Economy 35 (3): 64–88.
   Google Scholar
• Marangos, J. 2007. ‘Was Shock Therapy Consistent with the Washington Consensus?' Comparative Economic Studies 49 (1): 32–58.
   Google Scholar
• Marangos, J. 2009a. ‘The Evolution of the Term ‘Washington Consensus.' Journal of Economic Surveys 23 (2): 350–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangos, J. 2009b. 'Labor During Transition: A Radical Institutional Approach.' In Radical Economics and Labor: Essays Inspired by the IWW Centennial, edited by F. S. Lee, and J. Bekken, 143–158. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marangos, J. 2020. International Development and the Washington Consensus: A Pluralist Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marangos, J. forthcoming. ‘‘Troika’s Conditionalities During the Greek Financial Crisis 2010-2014: The Washington Consensus Is Alive, Well and Here to Stay’.' European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, C. A. 2019. ‘Theorizing Sino-Capitalism: Implications for the Study of Comparative Capitalisms.' Contemporary Politics 25 (3): 313–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neilson, D. 2018. ‘In-itself for-Itself: Towards Second-Generation neo-Marxist Class Theory.' Capital and Class 42 (2): 273–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissanke, M., and H. Stein. 2003. ‘Financial Globalization and Economic Development: Toward an Institutional Foundation.' Eastern Economic Journal 29 (2): 287–308.
   Google Scholar
• Popov, V. 2007. ‘Shock Therapy Versus Gradualism Reconsidered: Lessons from Transition Economies After 15 Years of Reforms.' Comparative Economic Studies 49 (1): 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, S., and R. Wolff. 2010. ‘The Economic Crisis: A Marxian Interpretation.' Rethinking Marxism 22 (2): 170–186.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 1996. ‘Understanding Economic Policy Reform.' Journal of Economic Literature 34 (1): 9–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2002. After Neoliberalism, What? Paper presented at the “Alternatives to Neoliberalism Conference” sponsored by the New Rules for Global Finance Coalition in May 23-24 and at the BNDES seminar on “New Paths to Development”, in September 12-13.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2004. Growth Strategies. Working Paper, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Ros, J. 2008. 'Classical Development Theory.' In International Handbook of Development Economics Volume One, edited by A. K. Dutt, and J. Ros, 111–124. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser Jr, J. B., and M. V. Rosser. 2001. ‘Another Failure of the Washington Consensus on Transition Countries: Inequality and Underground Economies ‘.' Challenge 44 (2): 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ruccio, D. F. 2011. ‘Development, Institutions and Class.' Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (4): 571–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasi, P. 2019. ‘The Grundrisse as Method: Surplus Value, Surplus Labor and Freedom from Work.' Science & Society 83 (4): 522–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, C. 2018. ‘The Accidental Marxist: Andre Gunder Frank and the neo-Marxist Theory of Underdevelopment, 1958-1967.' Modern Intellectual History 15 (2): 411–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 1998. More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving towards the Post–Washington Consensus. Wider Perspectives on Global Development. London: Wider Annual Lecture, The United Nations University, Helsinki, January 7.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 2000. 'Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition.' In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, edited by B. Pleskovic, and J. E. Stiglitz, 27–56. Washington, D. C.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, B. 2008. 'Marxism and Development.' In International Handbook of Development Economics Volume One, edited by A. K. Dutt, and J. Ros, 144–161. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. 2018. ‘Employment and Fiscal Policy in a Marxian Model.' Metroeconomica 69 (4): 820–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toporowski, J. 2018. ‘Marx, Finance and Political Economy.' Review of Political Economy 30 (3): 416–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. 2001. ‘The Expansion of Capital and Uneven Development on a World Scale.' Capital & Class 25 (2): 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 1990. 'What Washington Means by Policy Reform.' In Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?, edited by J. Williamson, 7–20. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 1993. ‘Democracy and the “Washington Consensus”.' World Development 21 (8): 1329–1336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 1994. 'In Search of a Manual for Technopolis.' In The Political Economy of Policy Reform, edited by J. Williamson, 11–34. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 1996. 'Lowest Common Denominator or Neoliberal Manifesto? The Polemics of the Washington Consensus.' In Challenging the Orthodoxies, edited by R. M. Auty, and J. Toye, 13–22. New York: St. Martins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 1999. Economic Reform: Content, Progress, Prospects. Paper Presented at the 50th Anniversary Celebration of the University of Baroda, November, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 2002. Did the Washington Consensus Fail? Outline of Remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, November, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 2003. '‘Summing Up’.' In After the Washington Consensus, edited by P. P. Kuczynski, and J. Williamson, 305–321. Washington DC: Institute for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 2004a. The Washington Consensus as policy prescription for development. A lecture in the series Practitioners of Development delivered at the World Bank, 13 January.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 2004b. ‘The Strange History of the Washington Consensus.' Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27 (2): 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. 2007. ‘Shock Therapy and the Washington Consensus: A Comment.' Comparative Economic Studies 49 (1): 59–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2018. ‘The Continuing Relevance of the Marxist Tradition for Transcending Capitalism.' TripleC 16 (2): 490–500.
   Google Scholar
• Yaghmaian, B. 1989. ‘Economic Development and the Determinants of Third World Debt.' Review of Radical Political Economics 21 (3): 99–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunker, J. A. 1986. ‘Would Democracy Survive Under Market Socialism?' Polity 18 (4): 678–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunker, J. A. 1997. Economic Justice: The Market Socialist Vision. Boston Way: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar