Logic and Economics I: Synthesis Neoclassicism

References

• Blanchard, O. 2000. ‘What Do We Know about Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell Did Not?’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (4): 1375–1409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O. 2008. ‘Neoclassical Synthesis.’ In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by S. Durlauf and L. Blume. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O. 2018. ‘On the Future of Macroeconomic Models.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34 (1–2): 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buiter, W. 2005. ‘New Developments in Monetary Economics: Two Ghosts, Two Eccentricities, a Fallacy, a Mirage and a Mythos.’ Economic Journal 115 (March): C1–C31.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. 1871. Through the Looking-Glass. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. 2013. What is This Thing Called Science? St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. 2006. Post-Walrasian Macroeconomics, Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D., P. Howitt, A. Kirman, A. Leijonhufvud, and P. Mehrling. 2008. ‘Beyond DSGE Models: Towards an Empirically Based Macroeconomics.’ American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 98 (2): 236–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copi, I. M., C. Cohen, and K. McMahon. 2014. Introduction to Logic. 14th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Debreu, G. 1986. ‘Theoretic Models: Mathematical Form and Economic Content.’ Econometrica 54 (6): 1259–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogelin, R., and W. Sinnott-Armstrong. 1997. Understanding Arguments. 5th ed. Orlando: Harcourt Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1968. ‘The Role of Monetary Policy.’ American Economic Review 58 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gali, J. 2015. Monetary Policy, Inflation and the Business Cycle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghironi, F. 2018. ‘Macro Needs Micro.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36 (3): 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhart, C. 2009. ‘The Continuing Muddles of Monetary Theory: A Steadfast Refusal to Face Facts.’ Economica 76 (1): 821–830.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, P. D. 1995. A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842–1924. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. 1980. ‘General Equilibrium Theory.’ The Public Interest, Fall, 123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, F. H. 1982. Money and Inflation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, R. 1967. Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, S. 2011. Debunking Economics. 2nd ed. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1907. ‘The Principles of Probability.’ Keynes Papers, King’s College Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1973a. A Treatise on Probability, vol. VIII in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1973b. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, vol. VII in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1973c. The General Theory and After: II Defence and Development, vol. XIV in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kirman, A. 1992. ‘Whom or What Does the Representative Agent Represent?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (2): 117–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D. M. 2013. Microeconomic Foundations I, Choice and Competitive Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 2009. The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008. New York: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leplin, J. 1982. ‘The Assessment of Auxiliary Hypotheses.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (30): 235–249.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1874. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. 2nd ed. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, R. 1989. Keynes: Philosophy, Economics and Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, R. 1991. ‘Keynes on Probability, Expectations and Uncertainty.‘ In Keynes as Philosopher-Economist, edited by R. O'Donnell. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, R. 2019. ‘Some Misunderstood Aspects of the Final Chapter of Keynes’s General Theory.’ Review of Political Economy 32 (4): 509–527.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, R. 2021a. ‘General Theory-Special Case Relationships: Keynes and Neoclassicism’, Review of Political Economy, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, R. 2021b. ‘Keynes and Knight: Risk-Uncertainty Distinctions, Priority, Coherence and Change.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 45: 127–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, R. 2018. ‘Is Something Really Wrong with Macroeconomics?’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34 (1–2): 132–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. 1989. Money, Interest and Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. 2006. ‘Doing Without Money: A Critical Assessment of Woodford’s Analysis.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics 30 (2): 293–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. 2011. ‘The Failure of Woodford’s Model of the Channel System in the Cashless Economy.’ Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43 (2/3): 553–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. 2013. ‘The Scientific Illusion of New Keynesian Monetary Theory.’ In The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol. 1, edited by G. Harcourt and P. Kriesler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. 2018a. ‘The Conceptual Flaw in the Microeconomic Foundations of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models.’ Review of Political Economy 30 (1): 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. 2018b. ‘The New Macroeconomics has no Clothes.’ Review of Keynesian Economics 6 (1): 22–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, F., and R. Wooters. 2003. ‘An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area.’ Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (5): 1123–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, F., and R. Wooters. 2007. ‘Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach.’ American Economic Review 97 (3): 586–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowdon, B., and H. Vane. 1999. Conversations with Leading Economists. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, R. 2011. General Equilibrium Theory, an Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vines, D., and S. Wills. 2018. ‘The Rebuilding Macroeconomic Theory Project: An Analytical Assessment.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 34 (1–2): 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines, D., and S. Wills. 2020. ‘The Rebuilding Macroeconomic Theory Project Part II: Multiple Equilibria, Toy Models, and Policy Models in a New Macroeconomic Paradigm.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36 (3): 427–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. 2017. Monetary Theory and Policy. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodford, M. 1998. ‘Doing Without Money: Controlling Inflation in a Post-Monetary World.’ Review of Economic Dynamics 1: 173–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodford, M. 2003. Interest and Prices. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wren-Lewis, S. 2020. ‘Mapping Types of Macromodel to Types of Macro User.’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36 (3): 498–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar