The Future for Political Economy: Towards Unity in Diversity?

References

• Bankovsky, M., and J. F. King. 2017. ‘Reviving the Living Dead, Economic Theory with Ethical Values.’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 80: 178–200.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, M. 2017. Morality and Power: Ethics, Economics and Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., and W. Carlin. 2020. ‘What Students Learn in Economics 101: Time for a Change.’ Journal of Economic Literature 58 (1): 176–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, G. J., E. Jones, and F. Stilwell. 2009. Political Economy Now: The Struggle for Alternative Economics at the University of Sydney. Sydney: Darlington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chester, L. 2019. ‘Judging Heterodox Economics: A Response to Hodgson’s Criticisms.’ Economic Thought 8 (1): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N., and R. Pollin. 2020. Climate Crisis and the Global Green New Deal. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cockett, R. 1994. Thinking the Unthinkable: Think-Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution 1931–1983. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. 2000. ‘The Death of Neoclassical Economics.’ Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22: 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. 2005. ‘The Making of an Economics Redux.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 176–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D. 2009. ‘Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Pluralism: Suggestions for an ‘Inside the Mainstream’ Heterodoxy.’ In Economic Pluralism, edited by R. Garnett, E. K. Olsen, and M. Starr. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D., R. Holt, and B. Rosser. 2013. ‘The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics.’ Review of Political Economy 16 (4): 485–499.
   Google Scholar
• CORE. 2020a. ‘Universities Using CORE.’ https://www.core-econ.org/universities-using-core/.
   Google Scholar
• CORE. 2020b. ‘Escaping From Imaginary Worlds.’ https://www.core-econ.org/escaping-from-imaginary-worlds/.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2007. The Soulful Science: What Economists Really Do and Why it Matters. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorbusch, L., and J. Kapeller. 2012. ‘Heterodox United vs. Mainstream City? Sketching a Framework for Interested Pluralism in Economics.’ Journal of Economic Issues 46 (4): 1035–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, G. 2002. ‘Anti-Rationalism in Political Economy.’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 50: 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, G. 2021. Journal of Australian Political Economy 87: 152–157.
   Google Scholar
• Dutt, A. K. 2014. ‘Dimensions of Pluralism in Economics.’ Review of Political Economy 26 (4): 479–494.
   Google Scholar
• Dymski, G. A. 2014. ‘The Neoclassical Sink and the Heterodox Spiral: Political Divides and Lines of Communication in Economics.’ Review of Keynesian Economics 2 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B., and B. Clark. 2020. The Robbery of Nature: Capitalism and the Ecological Rift. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullbrook, E. 2003. The Crisis in Economics: the Post-autistic Movement - the First 600 Days. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fullbrook, E. 2011. Toxic Textbooks. Institute for New Economic Thinking. https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/edward-fullbrook/.
   Google Scholar
• Fullbrook, E. 2016. Narrative Fixation in Economics. London: WEA and College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. E. 1997. The Representative Agent in Macroeconomics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbroner, R., and W. Milberg. 1996. The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, A. 2018. ‘The Decline of Original Institutional Economics in the Post World War 2 Period and the Perspectives of Today.’ Economic Thought 7 (1): 63–86.
   Google Scholar
• Heterodox Economic Directory. 2021. http://www.heterodoxnews.co/directory/.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2020. Is There a Future for Heterodox Economics? Institutions, Ideology and a Scientific Community. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kelton, D. 2020. The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the People’s Economy. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. E. 2013. ‘A Case for Pluralism in Economics.’ Economics and Labour Relations Review 24: 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, D.B., and Stern, C. 2007. ‘Is There a Free-Market Economist in the House? The Policy Views of American Economic Association Members.’ American Journal of Economics and Sociology 66 (2): 309–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2015. ‘Should Heterodox Economics be Taught Outside of Economics Departments?’ International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education 6 (2): 134–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2020. ‘Heterodox Economics as Seen by Geoffrey Hodgson.’ European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 17 (1): 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2017. ‘What is Wrong with Modern Economics and Why Does it Stay Wrong?’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 80: 26–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. S. 2006. ‘The Ranking Game, Class and Scholarship in American Mainstream Economics.’ Australasian Journal of Economics Education 3 (1-2): 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. S. 2012. ‘Heterodox Economics and its Critics.’ Review of Political Economy 24 (2): 337–351.
   Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. 2017. Late Neoclassical Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mankiw, N. G. 2019. Principles of Economics. Boston: Cenage.
   Google Scholar
• Mearman, A., D. Guizzo, and S. Berger. 2018. ‘Whither Political Economy? Evaluating the CORE Project as a Response for Calls for Change in Economics Teaching.’ Review of Political Economy 30 (2): 241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, J. (ed.). 2015. What is Neoclassical Economics? Debating the Origins, Meaning and Significance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nesiba, R. F. 2012. ‘What do Undergraduates Study in Heterodox Economics Programs? An Examination of the Curricula Structure at 36 Self-Identified Programs.’ On the Horizon 20 (3): 182–193.
   Google Scholar
• Ostry, J. D., A. Berg, and N. Tsangaridis. 2014. IMF Staff Discussion Note 14/02. Redistribution, Inequality and Growth.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Primrose, D. 2017. ‘The Subjectification of Homo Economicus in Behavioural Economics.’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 80: 88–128.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. M. 1955. Economics: Third Edition. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, B., J. Embury, and J. Morgan. 2015. ‘Give Them Something to Think About, Don’t Tell Them What to Think: A Constructive Alternative to the CORE Project.’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 50: 211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, J. 2015. ‘Towards an Activist Pedagogy in Heterodox Economics: The Case of Trade Union Economics Training.’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 75: 233–255.
   Google Scholar
• Stilwell, F. 2012. ‘Teaching Political Economy: Making a Difference?’ Studies in Political Economy 89: 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Stilwell, F. 2015. ‘Towards a Political Economy of the Possible.’ In Globalisation and Transnational Capitalism in Asia and Oceania, edited by J. Sprague, 302–317. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stilwell, F. 2016. ‘Heterodox Economics or Political Economy?’ Real World Economics Review 74: 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Stilwell, F. 2019a. ‘From Economics to Political Economy: Contradictions, Challenge and Change.’ American Journal of Economics and Sociology 78 (1): 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilwell, F. 2019b. The Political Economy of Inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeton, P. 1992. ‘Paul Streeton (Born 1917).’ In A Bibliographic Dictionary of Dissenting Economists, edited by P. Aretsis, and M. Sawyer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, T. 2015. ‘The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics.’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 75: 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, T. 2017. From Economics to Political Economy: The Promises, Problems and Solutions of Pluralist Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, V. 2001. ‘The Economics of Joan Robinson.’ Science and Society 65 (2): 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walshe, V. 2003. ‘Sen After Putnam.’ Review of Political Economy 15 (3): 315–394.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 2016. ‘How to be an Anti-Capitalist for the 21st Century.’ Journal of Australian Political Economy 77: 5–22.
   Google Scholar