Transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary exchanges between embodied cognition and performance practice: working across disciplines in a climate of divisive knowledge cultures

References

• Adams, F. (2010). Embodied cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, 9, 619–628. doi: 10.1007/s11097-010-9175-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483(7391), 531–533. doi: 10.1038/483531a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennington, G. (1999). Inter. In M. McQuillan, G. MacDonald, R. Purves, & S. Thomson (Eds.), Post-theory: New directions in criticism (pp. 103–119). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Academy. (2016). Crossing paths: Interdisciplinary institutions, careers, education and applications. Retrieved August 20, 2016, from http://www.britac.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Crossing20Paths20-20Executive20Summary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryon, E. (in press). Performing interdisciplinarity: Working across disciplines through an active aesthetic. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryon, E. R. (2009). Experience interdisciplinarity and embodied knowledge: Towards an active aesthetic using integrative performance practice. In Tanz im Musiktheater – Tanz als Musiktheater. Beziehungen von Tanz und Musik im Theater. Bericht über ein internationales Symposion, Hannover 2006 (pp. 135–146). Würzberg: Königshausen & Neumann.
   Google Scholar
• Bryon, E. R. (2014). Integrative performance: Practice and theory for the integrative performer. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, K. (2008). The art of innovation: Address to the national press club. Retrieved August 22, 2016, from http://archive.industry.gov.au/ministerarchive2011/carr/Speeches/Pages/THEARTOFINNOVATION-ADDRESSTOTHENATIONALPRESSCLUB.html
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. (2005). The problematics of a social constructivist approach to science. In CLCWeb Vol 7.3.1. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol7/iss3/1
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. (1998). Introduction. In C. P. Snow (Ed.), The two cultures (canto classics) (pp. vii--1xxiii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (2002). Performance studies, interventions and radical research. In the drama review 46, 2 (T174), Summer. New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. (2005). Science, culture and society: Understanding science in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1980). Blurred genres: The refiguration of social thought. American Scholar, 49(2), Springer. 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (2011). The Hedgehog, The Fox and the Magister’s Pox: Mending the Gap between science and the humanities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graff, H. J. (2015). Undisciplining knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the twentieth century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2002). Straw dogs: Thoughts on humans and other animals. London: Granta Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, P. R., & Levitt, N. (1998). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, J. (2005). Epistemic issues in phenomenology. In E. Craig (Ed.), The shorter Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (p. 791). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalising enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. Retrieved August 16, 2016, from http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2004). Professing performance, theatre in the academy form philology to performativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The post modern condition: A report on knowledge. (G. Geoff Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConachie, B. (2008). Engaging audiences: A cognitive approach to spectating in the theatre. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• McConachie, B. (2013). Theatre & mind. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. L. T. (2004). The nature of transdisciplinary research and practice. http://www.kon.org/hswp/archive/transdiscipl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moran, J. (2010). Interdisciplinarity. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. (2005). Transdisciplinarity – past, present and future. Paper presented at the second world congress of transdisciplinarity: What education for sustainable development? Attitude – Research – Action. Vitoria/Vila Velha Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6) 657–660. Sage Publications. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 615–631. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavis, P. (2001). Theatre studies and interdisciplinarity. Theatre Research International, 26, 153–163. doi: 10.1017/S0307883301000165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz, F., Schlange, T., & Asadullah, K. (2011). Believe it or not: How much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10, 712–713. doi: 10.1038/nrd3439-c1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, L. N., Soley, L. C., Wimmer, R. D. (1981). Replication in advertising research: 1977, 1978, 1979. Journal of Advertising, 10, 3–13. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1981.10672750
   Google Scholar
• Rupert, R. D. (2009). Cognitive systems and the extended mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schechner, R. (2002). Performance studies, an introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90–100. doi: 10.1037/a0015108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. (2014). The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. (2016). Performance theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. (1960). Afterthoughts on the “Two cultures” controversy. In Encounters: An anthology from the first ten years of encounter magazine (pp. 216–225). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. (1998). The two cultures (Canto classics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, A. (2008). Beyond the hoax: Science, philosophy and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, A. D. (1994). Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46/47, 217–252. Retreived from http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html
   Google Scholar
• Stern, L. N. (2016). Building on success and learning from experience: An independent review of the research excellence framework. Retrieved August 13, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/541338/ind-16-9-ref-stern-review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. (2004). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• University of British Columbia. (2016). Science and technology studies. Retrieved August 12, 2016, from https://sts.arts.ubc.ca
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M. (2014). Revolution, reform, or business as usual? The future prospects for embodied cognition. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 374–383). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1967). Science and the modern world: Lowell lectures 1925. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2011). Creative arts research: A long path to acceptance. Australian Universities’ Review, 53(2), 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9(4), 625–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar