1,450
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Discovery of effective infrequent sequences based on maximum probability path

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 63-82 | Received 24 Jan 2021, Accepted 01 Jul 2021, Published online: 19 Jul 2021

References

  • Alizadeh, M., Lu, X., Fahland, D., Zannone, N., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2018). Linking data and process perspectives for conformance analysis. Computers & Security, 73(1), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.10.010
  • Augusto, A., Conforti, R., Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., & Polyvyanyy, A. (2019). Split miner: Automated discovery of accurate and simple business process models from event logs. Knowledge and Information Systems, 59(2), 251–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1214-x
  • Awad, A., Weidlich, M., & Sakr, S. (2020). Process mining over unordered event streams. In 2020 2nd International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM) (pp. 81–88). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPM49681.2020.00022
  • Cao, R., Fang, X. W., Wang, L. L., & Fang, H. (2018). Mining and optimization of conditional infrequent behavior based on data consciousness. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 24(7), 1671–1679. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2018.07.008.
  • Chapela-Campa, D., Mucientes, M., & Lama, M. (2020). Understanding complex process models by abstracting infrequent behavior. Future Generation Computer Systems, 113(4), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.07.030
  • Cheng, H. J., & Kumar, A. (2015). Process mining on noisy logs—Can log sanitization help to improve performance? Decision Support Systems, 79(9), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.08.003
  • Deshmukh, S., Agarwal, M., Gupta, S., & Kumar, N. (2020). MOEA for discovering Pareto-optimal process models: An experimental comparison. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 21(3), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCSE.2020.106067
  • dos Santos Garcia, C., Meincheim, A., Junior, E. R. F., Dallagassa, M. R., Sato, D. M. V., Carvalho, D. R., & Scalabrin, E. E. (2019). Process mining techniques and applications – a systematic mapping study. Expert Systems with Applications, 133(2), 260–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.003
  • Ghionna, L., Greco, G., Guzzo, A., & Pontieri, L. (2008). Outlier detection techniques for process mining applications. In International symposium on methodologies for intelligent systems (pp. 150–159). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68123-6_17
  • Gleick, J. (2011). The information: A history, a theory, a flood. Vintage.
  • Gúnther, C. W., & Van Der Aalst, W. M. (2007). Fuzzy mining – adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In International conference on business process management (pp. 328–343). Springer.
  • Krajsic, P., & Franczyk, B. (2020). Lambda architecture for anomaly detection in online process mining using autoencoders. In International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence (pp. 579–589). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63119-2_47
  • Leemans, S. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2013a). Discovering block-structured process models from event logs-a constructive approach. In International Conference on Applications and Theory of Petri Nets and Concurrency (pp. 311–329). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38697-8_17
  • Leemans, S. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2013b). Discovering block-structured process models from event logs containing infrequent behaviour. In International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 66–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_6
  • Leemans, S. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2014). Discovering block-structured process models from incomplete event logs. In International Conference on Applications and Theory of Petri Nets and Concurrency (pp. 91–110). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07734-5_6
  • Leemans, S. J., Fahland, D., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2015). Scalable process discovery with guarantees. In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (pp. 85–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19237-6_6
  • Leemans, M., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2017). Modeling and discovering cancelation behavior. In OTM Confederated International Conferences on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (pp. 93–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_8
  • Liesaputra, V., Yongchareon, S., & Chaisiri, S. (2016). Efficient process model discovery using maximal pattern mining. In International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 441–456). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_29
  • Maggi, F. M., Bose, R. J. C., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2012). Efficient discovery of understandable declarative process models from event logs. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (pp. 270–285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31095-9_18
  • Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., & Reijers, H. A. (2017). Heuristic mining revamped: An interactive, data-aware, and conformance-aware miner. In Bpm (demos).
  • Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H. A., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2017). Data-driven process discovery-revealing conditional infrequent behavior from event logs. In International conference on advanced information systems engineering (pp. 545-560). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_34
  • Pecchia, A., Weber, I., Cinque, M., & Ma, Y. (2020). Discovering process models for the analysis of application failures under uncertainty of event logs. Knowledge-Based Systems, 189(1), 105054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105054
  • Sani, M. F., van Zelst, S. J., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2021). The impact of biased sampling of event logs on the performance of process discovery. Computing, 103(6), 1085–1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-021-00910-4
  • Sani, M. F., van Zelst, S. J., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2017). Improving process discovery results by filtering outliers using conditional behavioural probabilities. In International Conference on Business Process Management (pp. 216-229). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_16
  • Sani, M. F., van Zelst, S. J., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2018). Applying sequence mining for outlier detection in process mining. In OTM Confederated International Conferences on the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (pp. 98–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02671-4_6
  • Sun, X., Hou, W., Yu, D., Wang, J., & Pan, J. (2019). Filtering out noise logs for process modelling based on event dependency. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) (pp. 388–392). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2019.00069
  • Tax, N., Sidorova, N., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2019). Discovering more precise process models from event logs by filtering out chaotic activities. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 52(1), 107–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-018-0507-6
  • van der Aalst, W. M. (2016). Process mining: Data science in action. Springer.
  • W. Van der Aalst, Weijters, T., & Maruster, L. (2004). Workflow mining: Discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(9), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2004.47
  • Van der Werf, J. M. E., van Dongen, B. F., Hurkens, C. A., & Serebrenik, A. (2008). Process discovery using integer linear programming. In International conference on applications and theory of petri nets (pp. 368–387). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68746-7_24
  • van Zelst, S. J., Sani, M. F., Ostovar, A., Conforti, R., & M. La Rosa (2020). Detection and removal of infrequent behavior from event streams of business processes. Information Systems, 90(10), 101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.101451
  • van Zelst, S. J., van Dongen, B. F., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Verbeek, H. M. W. (2018). Discovering workflow nets using integer linear programming. Computing, 100(5), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-017-0582-5
  • Vázquez-Barreiros, B., Mucientes, M., & Lama, M. (2015). ProDiGen: Mining complete, precise and minimal structure process models with a genetic algorithm. Information Sciences, 294(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.057
  • Wang, Q., Zhu, G., Zhang, S., Li, K. C., Chen, X., & Xu, H. (2020). Extending emotional lexicon for improving the classification accuracy of Chinese film reviews. Connection Science, 33(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2020.1782839
  • Weijters, A., & Ribeiro, J. (2011). Flexible heuristics miner (FHM). In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) (pp. 310–317). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIDM.2011.5949453
  • Weijters, A. J. M. M., van Der Aalst, W. M., & De Medeiros, A. A. (2006). Process mining with the heuristics miner-algorithm. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Tech. Rep. WP, 166, 1–34 . https://research.tue.nl/nl/publications/process-mining-with-the-heuristicsminer-algorithm
  • Xiao, L., Xie, S., Han, D., Liang, W., Guo, J., & Chou, W. K. (2021). A lightweight authentication scheme for telecare medical information system. Connection Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2021.1889976
  • Yin, H., Zhang, J., & Qin, Z. (2020). A malware variants detection methodology with an opcode-based feature learning method and a fast density-based clustering algorithm. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 21(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCSE.2020.105209
  • Yu, L., Duan, Y., & Li, K. C. (2020). A real-world service mashup platform based on data integration, information synthesis, and knowledge fusion. Connection Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2020.1841110
  • Yu, W., Xiong, Z., Rong, S., Liu, Y., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Liu, A. X. (2020). Unambiguous discrimination of binary coherent states. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 22(2–3), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCSE.2020.107353