Blockchain application in P2P energy markets: social and legal aspects

References

• Alalwan, A. A., Baabdullah, A. M., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending tam with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technology in Society, 55(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Albayati, H., Kim, S. K., & Rho, J. J. (2020). Accepting financial transactions using blockchain technology and cryptocurrency: A customer perspective approach. Technology in Society, 62(3), 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101320
   Google Scholar
• Andoni, M., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Abram, S., Geach, D., Jenkins, D., McCallum, P., & Peacock, A. (2019). Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 100(1), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014
   Google Scholar
• Ante, L., Steinmetz, F., & Fiedler, I. (2021). Blockchain and energy: A bibliometric analysis and review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger, J. (2013). Speculative design: Crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity, 24(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges, C. E., & Casado-Mansilla, D. (2021, February). EU citizens perceptions about autonomous trading systems and smart contracts. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4558724
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, S., Fernandez-Pales, A., McGlade, C., Remme, U., & Wanner, B. (Eds.). (2021). Net zero by 2050 (Tech. Rep.). IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brilliantova, V., & Thurner, T. W. (2019). Blockchain and the future of energy. Technology in Society, 57(9), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Buterin, V. (2013). Ethereum whitepaper. https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, S., Zeng, B., & Huang, Y. Z. (2017, November). Research on application model of blockchain technology in distributed electricity market. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 93(1), 012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/93/1/012065
   Google Scholar
• Consensys, L. (2018). Grid+ white paper. (Tech. Rep.). Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Corrales, M., Jurčys, P., & Kousiouris, G. (2019). Smart contracts and smart disclosure: Coding a GDPR compliance framework. In M. Corrales, M. Fenwick, & H. Haapio (Eds.), Legal tech, smart contracts and blockchain (pp. 189–220). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Etukudor, C., Couraud, B., Robu, V., Früh, W.-G., Flynn, D., & Okereke, C. (2020). Automated negotiation for peer-to-peer electricity trading in local energy markets. Energies, 13(4), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2008). Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I). Official Journal, L 177, 6–16. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32008R0593
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1978). Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behaviour relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(78)90035-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giancaspro, M. (2017). Is a ‘smart contract'really a smart idea? Insights from a legal perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(6), 825–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goranovié, A., Meisel, M., Fotiadis, L., Wilker, S., Treytl, A., & Sauter, T. (2017, October 29–November 1). Blockchain applications in microgrids an overview of current projects and concepts. IECON 2017 – 43rd annual conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Beijing, China (pp. 6153–6158). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2017.8217069
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. (2020). Blockchain distributed ledger technology: An introduction and focus on smart contracts. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 31(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.v31.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamouda, M. R., Nassar, M. E., & Salama, M. M. A. (2021). A novel energy trading framework using adapted blockchain technology. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12(3), 2165–2175. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2020.3045662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iosif, E., Christodoulou, K., & Vlachos, A. (2021). Web mining for estimating regulatory blockchain readiness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.13235.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J., Yu, R., Huang, X., Maharjan, S., Zhang, Y., & Hossain, E. (2017). Enabling localized peer-to-peer electricity trading among plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using consortium blockchains. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(6), 3154–3164. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2709784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanwal, F., & Rehman, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries – empirical evidence from pakistan's higher education sector. IEEE Access, 5, 10968–10978. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2714379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapassa, E., Themistocleous, M., Quintanilla, J. R., Touloupos, M., & Papadaki, M. (2020). Blockchain in smart energy grids: A market analysis. In M. Themistocleous, M. Papadaki, & M. M. Kamal (Eds.), Information systems (pp. 113–124). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kapassa, E., Touloupou, M., & Themistocleous, M. (2021, September 8–11). Local electricity and flexibility markets: Swot analysis and recommendations. 6th International conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), Bol and Split, Croatia (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech52315.2021.9566362
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. J., & Gilkis, K. B. (2019). Contracts by legal information institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contract
   Google Scholar
• Kostmann, M., & Härdle, W. K. (2019). Forecasting in blockchain-based local energy markets. Energies, 12(14), 2718. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12142718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounelis, I., Steri, G., Giuliani, R., Geneiatakis, D., Neisse, R., & Nai-Fovino, I. (2017, July 10–12). Fostering consumers’ energy market through smart contracts. 2017 International conference in Energy and Sustainability in Small Developing Economies (ES2DE), Funchal, Portugal (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ES2DE.2017.8015343
   Google Scholar
• Kumari, A., Gupta, R., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., & Kumar, N. (2020). When blockchain meets smart grid: Secure energy trading in demand response management. IEEE Network, 34(5), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A., Tian, G., Miao, M., & Gong, J. (2021). Blockchain-based cross-user data shared auditing. Connection Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2021.1956879
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T., Courcelas, L., & Timsit, K. (2019). Legal and regulatory framework of blockchains and smart contracts. Thematic report for the European Union Blockchain observatory and forum (Vol. 27).
   Google Scholar
• Meeuw, A., Schopfer, S., Wörner, A., Tiefenbeck, V., Ableitner, L., Fleisch, E., & Wortmann, F. (2020). Implementing a blockchain-based local energy market: Insights on communication and scalability. Computer Communications, 160(12), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.04.038
   Google Scholar
• Mengelkamp, E., Gärttner, J., Rock, K., Kessler, S., Orsini, L., & Weinhardt, C. (2018). Designing microgrid energy markets: A case study: The Brooklyn microgrid. Applied Energy, 210(6), 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.054
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized Business Review, 21260.
   Google Scholar
• Nzuva, S. (2019). Smart contracts implementation, applications, benefits, and limitations. School of Computing and Information Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• Okwuibe, G. C., Zade, M., Tzscheutschler, P., Hamacher, T., & Wagner, U. (2020, November 9–10). A blockchain-based double-sided auction peer-to-peer electricity market framework. 2020 IEEE Electric Power and Energy Conference (EPEC), Edmonton, AB, Canada (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEC48502.2020.9320030
   Google Scholar
• O'Shields, R. (2017). Smart contracts: Legal agreements for the blockchain (21 N.C. Banking Inst. 177). http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi/vol21/iss1/11
   Google Scholar
• Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac – A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
   Google Scholar
• Parity Consortium. (2019). Pro-sumer aware, transactive markets for valorization of distributed flexibility enabled by smart energy contracts. https://parity-h2020.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, N. R., Singh, A. P., Kumar, N., Hassan, M. M., & Roy, D. S. (2022). A flexible permission ascription (FPA)-based blockchain framework for peer-to-peer energy trading with performance evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(4), 2465–2475. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3096832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressmair, G., Kapassa, E., Casado-Mansilla, D., Borges, C. E., & Themistocleous, M. (2021). Overcoming barriers for the adoption of local energy and flexibility markets: A user-centric and hybrid model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317(3), 128323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128323
   Google Scholar
• Qian, J. (2010). Sampling. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed. pp. 390–395). Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080448947013610
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. (2017). The law and legality of smart contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 1, 305.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, A., Lockl, J., Urbach, N., Guggenmos, F., & Fridgen, G. (2019). Building a blockchain application that complies with the eu general data protection regulation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(4), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell, H., & Wolff, P. (Eds.). (2019). Ageing Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-statistical-books/-/KS-02-19-681
   Google Scholar
• Strepparava, D., Nespoli, L., Kapassa, E., Touloupou, M., Katelaris, L., & Medici, V. (2022). Deployment and analysis of a blockchain-based local energy market. Energy Reports, 8(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.283
   Google Scholar
• Team, P. (2022). Representative samples. Retrieved January 23, 2022, from https://researcher-help.prolific.co/hc/en-gb/articles/360019236753-Representative-samples
   Google Scholar
• Touloupou, M., Christodoulou, K., Inglezakis, A., Iosif, E., & Themistocleous, M. (2021, September 27–30). Towards a framework for understanding the performance of blockchains. 2021 3rd Conference on Blockchain Research Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS), Paris, France (pp. 47–48). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BRAINS52497.2021.9569810
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Wang, Q., Zhou, N., & Chi, Y. (2017). A novel electricity transaction mode of microgrids based on blockchain and continuous double auction. Energies, 10(12), 1971. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10121971
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., Viney, H., & Schomaker, P. (2002). Consumer attitudes to utility products: A consumer behaviour perspective. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 20(7), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500210450837
   Google Scholar
• Zabaleta, K., Casado-Mansilla, D., Kapassa, E., Borges, C. E., Preßmair, G., Themistocleous, M., & López-de Ipiña, D. (2020, September 23–26). Barriers to widespread the adoption of electric flexibility markets: A triangulation approach. 2020 5th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), Split, Croatia (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech49282.2020.9243744
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Yao, T., Arthur Sandor, V. K., Weng, T.-H., Liang, W., & Su, J. (2021). A novel blockchain-based privacy-preserving framework for online social networks. Connection Science, 33(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2020.1854181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017, June 25–30). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress), Honolulu, HI (pp. 557–564). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z., Zhou, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, B., & Li, K. (2021). Applications of federated learning in smart cities: Recent advances, taxonomy, and open challenges. Connection Science, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2021.1936455
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Wu, J., Long, C., & Ming, W. (2020). State-of-the-art analysis and perspectives for peer-to-peer energy trading. Engineering, 6(7), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar