The mad genie in the attic: performances of identity in Year 6 boys' creative writing

References

• Andrews, R. 2008. Getting Going. Nottingham: DCSF.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 2000. “Unitary Language.” In The Routledge Language and Cultural Theory Reader, edited by L. Burke, T. Crowley, and A. Girvin, 269–284. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1992. “The Death of the Author.” In Modern Literary Theory - A Reader, edited by P. Rice and P. Waugh, 118–122. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham, MD: Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bronte, C. 1962. Jane Eyre. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, E., and M. Maclure. 2005. “Deconstruction.” In Research Methods in the Social Sciences, edited by B. Somekh and C. Lewin, 284–292. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2000. “From Parody to Politics.” In The Routledge Language and Cultural Theory Reader, edited by L. Burke, T. Crowley, and A. Girvin, 174–179. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, A. 1990. “The Implied Reader.” In Children's Literature: The Development of Criticism, edited by P. Hunt, 30–35. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., and F. M. Connelly. 2000. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2005. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2006. “Identity, Abjection and Otherness: Creating the Self, Creating Difference.” In The Routledge Falmer Reader in Gender and Education, edited by M. Arnot and M. Mac an Ghaill, 72–90. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J., and A. Bass. 2001. Writing and Difference. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, T. S. 2011. “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” In The Sacred Wood, 39–49. London: Barnes and Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1998. Technologies of Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault.Cambridge: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis – Theory and Method. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. M., and S. Gubar. 2000. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., W. Lachicotte, D. Skinner, and C. Cain. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, B. 2008. “Literacy, Subjectivity and the Gender Divide: “the Freedom of Writing Implies the Freedom of the Citizen” (Sartre, 1948).” Gender and Education 20 (5): 511–525. doi: 10.1080/09540250701797218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P. 2005. Understanding Children's Literature: Key Essays From the Second Edition of The International Companion Encyclopaedia of Children's Literature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ings, R. 2009. Writing is Primary: Action Research on the Teaching of Writing in Primary Schools. London: Esmee Fairburn Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W. 1992. “The Reading Process.” In Modern Literary Theory – A Reader, edited by P. Rice and P. Waugh, 76–81. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ivinson, G., and P. Murphy. 2006. “Boys Don't Write Romance: The Construction of Knowledge and Social Gender Identities in English Classrooms.” In The Routledge Falmer Reader in Gender and Education, edited by M. Arnot and M. Mac an Ghaill, 72–90. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. 2013. “Critical Literacy in Teaching and Research.” Educational Inquiry 14 (2): 225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Jauss, H. R. 1992. “Literary History as a Challenge to Literacy Theory.” Modern Literary Theory – A Reader, edited by P. Rice and P. Waugh, 82–88. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kristeva, J., and L. S. Roudiez. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lancia, P. 1997. “Literary Borrowings: The Effects of Literature on Children's Writing.” The Reading Teacher 50 (6): 470–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1991. Getting Smart – Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Postmodern. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mac an Ghaill, M. 1994. The Making of Men. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., I. Christie, and J. Rothery. 1987. “Social Processes in Education: A Reply to Sawyer and Watson (and Others).” In The Place of Genre in Learning: Current Debates, edited by I. Reid, 35–45. Geelong: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, S. 2007. “Writing Texts with Radical Change Characteristics’.” Literacy 41 (1): 16–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00446.x
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. 2006. “‘Spice Girls’, ‘Nice Girls’, ‘Girlies’, and ‘Tomboys’: Gender Discourses, Girls’ Cultures and Femininities in the Primary Classroom.” In The Routledge Falmer Reader in Gender and Education, edited by M. Arnot and M. Mac an Ghaill, 72–90. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, L. K. 2008. “Generous Reading: Discovering Dialogic Voices in Writing.” English in Education 42 (3): 253–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-8845.2008.00021.x
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. J. 2000. “Good Guys Don't Wear Hats”: Children's Talk About the Media. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar