Gendered hegemony and its contradictions among Finnish university physicists

References

• Aarrevaara, T., and E. Pekkola. 2010. Muuttuva akateeminen professio Suomessa – maaraportti [Changing academic profession in Finland]. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J. 1992. “Gendering Organizational Theory.” In Gendering Organizational Analysis, edited by A. Mills and P. Tancred, 248–260. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bailyn, L. 2003. “Academic Careers and Gender Equity: Lessons Learned from MIT.” Gender, Work & Organization 10 (2): 137–153. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S. 2011. “Unsettling Universities’ Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures: A Case Study Approach.” Gender, Work & Organization 18 (2): 202–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. 1980. On History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2012. “Slaying the Seven-Headed Dragon: The Quest for Gender Change in Academia.” Gender, Work & Organization 19 (1): 71–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2011.00566.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M., Y. Benschop, and W. Jansen. 2010. “Transparency in Academic Recruitment: A Problematic Tool for Gender Equality.” Organization Studies 31 (11): 1459–1483. doi: 10.1177/0170840610380812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, A. 2012. “Exploring Woman University Physics Students ‘Doing Gender’ and ‘Doing Physics’.” Gender and Education 24 (1): 25–39. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2011.565040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elg, U., and K. Jonnergård. 2010. “Included or Excluded? The Dual Influences of the Organizational Field and Organisational Practices on New Female Academics.” Gender and Education 22 (2): 209–225. doi: 10.1080/09540250903283447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. [1987] 2014. Learning by Expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2011. “Discursive Manifestations of Contradictions in Organizational Change Efforts: A Methodological Framework.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 24 (3): 368–387. doi: 10.1108/09534811111132758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engman, M. 2000. “Yli “sukupuolen aiheuttamien” esteiden. Akateemisen naissivistyksen uranuurtajat [Female Pioneers in the Finnish Academia].” In Tiedenaisia. Suomalaisia tiedenaisia eilen ja tänään, edited by L. Husu, and E. Peltonen, 7–14. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston kirjasto.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. She Figures 2012: Gender in Research and Innovation. Statistics and Indicators. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., and B. Poggio. 2001. “Creating and Recreating Gender Order in Organizations.” Journal of World Business 36 (3): 245–259. doi: 10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00054-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, C., and K. L. Minnotte. 2010. “Recruiting and Hiring Women in STEM Fields.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 3 (4): 218–229. doi: 10.1037/a0020581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1992. Vol. I of Prison Notebooks. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 2007a. Vol. III of Prison Notebooks. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 2007b. Quaderni dal carcere [Prison Notebooks]. Torino: Enaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Grummell, B., D. Devine, and K. Lynch. 2009. “The Care-Less Manager: Gender, Care and New Managerialism in Higher Education.” Gender and Education 21 (2): 191–208. doi: 10.1080/09540250802392273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasse, C. 2008. “General Introduction.” In Draw the Line! Universities as Workplaces for Male and Female Researchers in Europe, edited by C. Hasse, A. B. Sinding, and S. Trentemöller, 9–17. Tartu: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, C., and S. Trentemoller. 2009. “The Method of Culture Contrast.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 6: 46–66. doi: 10.1080/14780880902900903
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., L. D. Tyson, and S. Zahidi. 2012. The Global Gender Gap Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschfield, L. E., and T. D. Joseph. 2012. “‘We Need a Woman, We Need a Black Woman’: Gender, Race, and Identity Taxation in the Academy.” Gender and Education 24 (2): 213–227. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2011.606208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, D., and M. Cole. 1995. “Between Discourse and Schema: Reformulating a Cultural-Historical Approach to Culture and Mind.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 26 (4): 475–490. doi: 10.1525/aeq.1995.26.4.05x1065y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyenkov, E. V. 1977. Dialectical Logic: Essays in Its History and Theory. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyenkov, E. V. 1982. The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx's Capital. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, E. 1987. Nainen ja maailmankaikkeus [The Woman and the Universe]. Helsinki: Ursa.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson Lears, T. J. 1985. “The Concept of Cultural Hegemony: Problems and Possibilities.” The American Historical Review 90 (3): 567–593. doi: 10.2307/1860957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, F. A., and M. K. Tetreault. 2011. “Long-Term Transformations: Excavating Privilege and Diversity in the Academy.” Gender and Education 23 (3): 281–297. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2010.491790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2008. Tasa-arvo [Gender Equality]. http://www.research.fi/nakokulmia/tasa_arvo.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2014. “ Vipunen-database” [Statistical Data on Educational Fields in Finland]. http://vipunen.fi/fi-fi/.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. 2013. “The Rules of the Game: Women and the Leaderist Turn in Higher Education.” Gender and Education 25 (1): 116–131. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.740888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. 1997. “The Problem of Hegemony: Rereading Gramsci for Organizational Communication Studies.” Western Journal of Communication 61 (4): 343–375. doi: 10.1080/10570319709374585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., and K. L. Ashcraft. 2006. “Organizational Communication Studies and Gendered Organization: A Response to Martin and Collinson.” Gender, Work & Organization 13: 68–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgia, A., and B. Poggio. 2013. “Fathers’ Stories of Resistance and Hegemony in Organizational Cultures.” Gender, Work & Organization 20 (4): 413–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Health and Welfare. 2012. Tilastotietoa perhevapaiden käytöstä [Statistics on the Take Up of Family Leave]. http://www.thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-asiantuntijatyo/hankkeet-ja-ohjelmat/perhevapaatutkimus/tilastotietoa-perhevapaiden-kaytosta.
   Google Scholar
• Rolin, K., and J. Vainio. 2011. “Gender in Academia in Finland: Tensions Between Policies and Gendering Processes in Physics Departments.” Science Studies 24 (1): 26–46.
   Google Scholar
• Social Insurance Institution of Finland. 2014. “ Benefits for Families with Children.” http://www.kela.fi/web/en/families.
   Google Scholar
• Tala, S. 2006. Tasa-arvon toteuttaminen fysiikan opinnoissa ja tutkijakoulutuksessa: Helsingin yliopiston Fysikaalisten tieteiden laitoksen tasa-arvohanke [Gender Equality Project in the Department of Physics at the University of Helsinki]. http://www.physics.helsinki.fi/common/henkilokunta/FTLnTa-hanke_2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. 2009. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki. 2000. Tiedenaisia [Women of Learning]. http://www.helsinki.fi/akka-info/tiedenaiset/etusivu.html.
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki. 2004. Ensimmäinen nainen fysiikan professoriksi Helsingin yliopistoon [The First Female Professor Appointed in Physics]. http://savotta.helsinki.fi/halvi/tiedotus/lehti.nsf/e1e392ad852e72f5c225680000404fa8/0ec94350e1080d9ec2256f02002c34e3?OpenDocument.
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki. 2008. Department of Physics, annual report 2008. http://www.physics.helsinki.fi/vuosikertomukset/vuosikertomus-2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki. 2013. Department of Physics – List of personnel. Accessed October 9, 2013. http://www.physics.helsinki.fi/hallinto/hkluettelo.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vainio, J. 2008. “National Report Finland.” In Draw the Line! Universities as Workplaces for Male and Female Researchers in Europe, edited by C. Hasse, A. B. Sinding, and S. Trentemøller, 215–261. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vainio, J. 2012. Hegemony, Gender and Contradiction in the Context of Finnish University Physics. Helsinki: Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. 2011. “Is the Knowledge Society Gendered?” Gender, Work & Organization 18 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 2000. “Emergent Change as Universal in Organizations.” In Breaking the Code of Change, edited by M. Beer, and N. Nohria, 223–242. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winchester, H., S. Lorenzo, and L. Browning. 2006. “Academic Women's Promotions in Australian Universities.” Employee Relations 28 (6): 505–522. doi: 10.1108/01425450610704461
   Google Scholar