Neoliberal narratives and the logic of abstinence only education: why are we still having this conversation?

References

• Alloway, N., and L. Dalley-Trim. 2009. “It’s All about ‘I’: Gen Ys and Neoliberal Discourse in ‘New Times.’” Youth Studies Australia 28 (1): 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Bleakley, A., M. Hennessy, and M. Fishbein. 2006. “Public Opinion on Sex Education in US Schools.” Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 160 (11): 1151–1156. doi:10.1001/archpedi.160.11.1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra, H. D. 2009. “Advocates Call for a New Approach after the Era of ‘Abstinence-Only’ Sex Education.” Guttmacher Policy Review 12 (1): 6–11. http://www.guttmacher.org.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, H. D. 2010. “A Winning Campaign: California’s Concerted Effort to Reduce its Teen Pregnancy Rate.” Guttmacher Policy Review 13 (2): 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, H. D. 2014. “What Is Behind the Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates?” Guttmacher Policy Review 17 (3): 15–21. http://www.guttmacher.org.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2003. Firing Back: Against the Tyranny of the Market 2. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, D. 2012. The Education of Eros: A History of Education and the Problem of Adolescent Sexuality. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2012. Washington, DC. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats12/surv2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015. HIV in the United States: At a Glance. Washington, DC. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html.
   Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency. 2014. “ HIV/AIDS: Adult Prevalence Rate. In the World Factbook.” https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2155rank.html.
   Google Scholar
• Corngold, J. 2013. “Moral Pluralism and Sex Education.” Educational Theory 63 (5): 461–482. doi: 10.1111/edth.12035
   Google Scholar
• Demerath, P. 2009. Producing Success: The Culture of Personal Advancement in an American High School. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. 2012. The Twilight of Equality?: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. 2014. “‘Who’s to Blame?’ Constructing the Responsible Sexual Agent in Neoliberal Sex Education.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11 (3): 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s13178-014-0158-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. 2004. “What Happens to the Girls? Gender, Work and Learning in Canada’s ‘New Economy1.’” Gender and Education 16 (2): 169–185. doi: 10.1080/09540250310001690564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M., and S. I. McClelland. 2006. “Sexuality Education and Desire: Still Missing after All These Years.” Harvard Educational Review 76 (3): 297–338. doi: 10.17763/haer.76.3.w5042g23122n6703
   Google Scholar
• Gard, M., and C. Pluim. 2014. Schools and Public Health; Past, Present and Future. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gereluk, D. 2013. “The Democratic Imperative to Address Sexual Equality Rights in Schools.” Educational Theory 63 (5): 511–523. doi: 10.1111/edth.12038
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Amy. 2012. “Democratic Education.” In Classic and Contemporary Readings in Philosophy of Education, edited by S. M. Cahn, 328–344. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. 2009. Facts on Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United States. Washington, DC: Guttmacher Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. 2014a. Facts on American Teen’s Sexual and Reproductive Health. Washington, DC. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-ATSRH.html.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. 2014b. State Policies in Brief: Sex and HIV Education. Washington, DC. https://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_SE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. 2015. Unintended Pregnancy in the United States. Washington, DC. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Unintended-Pregnancy-US.html.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. 2016. State Policies in Brief: Sex and HIV education. Washington, DC. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/spibs/spib_SE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, J. 2002. Talk about Sex: The Battles Over Sex Education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, L. M., J. S. Santelli, J. Teitler, and R. Balmer. 2008. “Abstinence-Only Policies and Programs: An Overview.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 5 (3): 6–17. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2008.5.3.6
   Google Scholar
• Kidder, D. P., R. J. Wolitski, S. L. Pals, and M. L. Campsmith. 2008. “Housing Status and HIV Risk Behaviors among Homeless and Housed Persons with HIV.” JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 49 (4): 451–455. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31818a652c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, D. 2007. Emerging Answers 2007: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, Sharon. 2013. “Just the Facts? The Separation of Sex Education from Moral Education.” Educational Theory 63 (5): 443–460. doi: 10.1111/edth.12034
   Google Scholar
• Lees, S. 1994. “Talking about Sex in Sex Education.” Gender and Education 6 (3): 281–292. doi: 10.1080/0954025940060304
   Google Scholar
• McAvoy, P. 2013. “The Aims of Sex Education: Demoting Autonomy and Promoting Mutuality.” Educational Theory 63 (5): 483–496. doi: 10.1111/edth.12036
   Google Scholar
• National Coalition for the Homeless. 2014. “ LGBT Homelessness.” http://nationalhomeless.org/issues/lgbt/.
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, P. 1992. “Risk, Power and Crime Prevention.” Economy and Society 21 (3): 252–275.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolakaki, M. 2012. “Critical Pedagogy in the New Dark Ages: Challenges and Possibilities.” In Critical Pedagogy in the New Dark Ages, edited by M. Nikolakaki, 3–31. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Reproductive Health Technologies Project. 2014. “ Sexually Transmitted Infection: A Major Women’s Health Concen.” http://www.rhtp.org/std/types.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J. 2007. “Successful Girls? Complicating Postfeminist Neoliberal Discourses of Educational Achievement and Gender Equality.” Gender and Education 19 (4): 471–489. doi: 10.1080/09540250701442666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, H. 2014. “ FY 2015 Ominbus – Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Appropriations.” http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/lhhs_press_summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saewyc, E.M., L.H. Bearinger, R.W. Blum, and M.D. Resnick. 1999. “Sexual Intercourse, Abuse, and Pregnancy among Adolescent Women: Does Sexual Orientation Make a Difference?” Family Planning Perspectives 31 (3): 127–131. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3112799.pdf. doi: 10.2307/2991695
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Society for Adolescent Medicine. 2006. “Abstinence-Only Education Policies and Programs: A Position Paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.” Journal of Adolescent Health 38: 83–87. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanger-Hall, K. F., and D. W. Hall. 2011. “Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the US.” PLoS One 6 (10): e24658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2009. International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Ward S. C. 2012. Neoliberalism and the Global Restructuring of Knowledge and Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins A. 2012. “Push and Pull in the Classroom: Competition, Gender and the Neoliberal Subject.” Gender and Education 24 (7): 765–781. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2011.606207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar