Bodies, hoodies, schools, and success: post-human performativity and smart girlhood

References

• Adams, N., A. Schmitke, and A. Frankiln. 2005. “Tomboys, Dykes, and Girly Girls: Interrogating the Subjectivities of Adolescent Female Athletes.” Women's Studies Quarterly 33 (1/2): 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, S., and S. Hekman. 2008. Material Feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. 2016. “Photos of (No)thing: The Becoming of Data About Sexuality at School.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 7 (1). doi:10.7577/rerm.1822.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., L. T. Hamilton, E. M. Armstrong, and J. L. Seeley. 2014. “‘Good Girls’: Gender, Social Class, and Slut Discourse on Campus.” Social Psychology Quarterly 77 (2): 100–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. 2010. “Great Expectations and Post-Feminist Accountability: Young Women Living Up to the ‘Successful Girls’ Discourse.” Gender and Education 22 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” Parallax 20 (3): 168–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettie, J. 2003. Women without Class: Girls, Race, and Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2016. “Posthuman Critical Theory.” In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, edited by Debashish Banerji, and Makarand R. Paranjape, 13–32. New Delhi: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cobbett, M. 2014. “Being ‘Nuff’ and ‘Scudding Class’: Exploring Girls’ and Boys’ Perceptions of Popularity, Gender and Achievement in Antiguan Secondary Schools.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (1): 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlin, M. 2003. “The New Gender Gap: From Kindergarten to Grad School, Boys Are Becoming the Second Sex.” Business Week. May 26. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2003-05-25/the-new-gender-gap.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., and S. Frost. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2014. “Reading Anger in Early Childhood Intra-Actions: A Diffractive Analysis.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 734–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T. A., and C. Buchmann. 2013. The Rise of Women: The Growing Gender Gap in Education and What It Means for American Schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., J. Elwood, V. Hey, and J. Maw. 1998. Failing Boys?: Issues in Gender and Achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., and P. B. Alldred. 2015. “New Materialist Social Inquiry: Designs, Methods and the Research-Assemblage.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (4): 399–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., B. Read, and C. Skelton. 2010. “The Simultaneous Production of Educational Achievement and Popularity: How Do Some Pupils Accomplish it?” British Educational Research Journal 36 (2): 317–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., B. Read, and C. Skelton. 2012. The Identities and Practices of High Achieving Pupils: Negotiating Achievement and Peer Cultures. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B., and C. Skelton. 2005. Reassessing Gender and Achievement: Questioning Contemporary Key Debates. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S., A. Phoenix, and R. Pattman. 2001. Young Masculinities: Understanding Boys in Contemporary Society. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, L. 2009. Supergirls Speak Out: Inside the Secret Crisis of Overachieving Girls. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Gerodetti, N., and M. McNaught-Davis. 2017. “Feminisation of Success or Successful Femininities? Disentangling ‘New Femininities’ Under Neoliberal Conditions.” European Journal of Women's Studies 24 (4): 351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, R. 2007. “Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 10 (2): 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1992. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In Cultural Studies, edited by Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson, and Paula A. Treichler, 295–337. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2004. Future Girl: Young Women in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. 2003. “Mapping Transformations in Educational Subjectivities: Working within and against Discourse.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 7 (1): 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Huhman, H. R. 2012. “STEM Fields and the Gender Gap: Where Are the Women?” Forbes, June 20. https://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-progress/2012/06/20/stem-fields-and-the-gender-gap-where-are-the-women/#34052f6541ba.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, K., and H. Lenz Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23: 525–542.
   Google Scholar
• Ivinson, G., and E. Renold. 2013. “Valleys’ Girls: Re-Theorising Bodies and Agency in a Semi-Rural Post-Industrial Locale.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 704–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., and L. A. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data across Multiple Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jagger, G. 2015. “The New Materialism and Sexual Difference.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 40 (2): 321–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juelskjaer, M. 2013. “Gendered Subjectivities of Spacetimematter.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 754–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindlon, D. J. 2006. Alpha Girls: Understanding the New American Girl and How She Is Changing the World. New York: Holtzbrinck.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshmi, C. 2007. “The Supergirl Syndrome.” Nation, May 14.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. 2012. “A Diffractive and Deleuzian Approach to Analysing Interview Data.” Feminist Theory 13 (3): 265–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H., and A. Palmer. 2013. “A More ‘Livable’ School? A Diffractive Analysis of the Performative Enactments of Girls’ Ill-/Well-Being with(in) School Environments.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 671–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, T. 2006. “At Colleges, Women Are Leaving Men in the Dust.” New York Times, July 9. www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/education/09college.html.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. 2013. “Classification or Wonder? Coding as an Analytic Practice in Qualitative Research.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by B. Coleman, and J. Ringrose, 164–183. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 1987. “Notes on the Translation and Acknowledgements.” In A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, edited by Gilles Deleuze, and Felix Guattari, xvi–xix. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan, M. 2013. “The Impact of Social Policy on the Gendered Division of Housework.” Journal of Family Theory & Review 5: 124–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, S. 2008. Girls, Style, and School Identities: Dressing the Part. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, S., and R. Raby. 2011. “‘Oh, She’s so Smart’: Girls’ Complex Engagements with Post/Feminist Narratives of Academic Success.” Gender and Education 23 (5): 549–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, S., and R. Raby. 2017. Smart Girls: Success, School, and the Myth of Post-Feminism. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, S., R. Raby, and A. Stefanik. 2013. “Girls Run the World? Caught between Sexism and Postfeminism in the School.” Gender & Society 27 (2): 185–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raby, R., and S. Pomerantz. 2015. “Playing It Down/Playing It Up: Girls Strategic Negotiations of Academic Success.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 36 (4): 507–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E., and A. Allan. 2006. “Bright and Beautiful: High Achieving Girls, Ambivalent Femininities, and the Feminization of Success in the Primary School.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 27 (4): 457–473.
   Google Scholar
• Renold, E., and G. Ivinson. 2014. “Horse-Girl Assemblages: Towards a Post-Human Cartography of Girls’ Desire in an Ex-Mining Valleys Community.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35 (3): 361–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimer, S. 2007. “For Girls, It’s Be Yourself, and Be Perfect, Too.” New York Times.com, June 28. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/us/01girls.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J. 2007. “Successful Girls? Complicating Post-Feminist, Neoliberal Discourses of Educational Achievement and Gender Equality.” Gender and Education 19 (4): 471–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J. 2013. Postfeminist Education? Girls and the Sexual Politics of Schooling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., and J. Rawlings. 2015. “Posthuman Performativity, Gender and ‘School Bullying’: Exploring the Material-Discursive Intra-Actions of Skirts, Hair, Sluts, and Poofs.” Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics 3 (2): 80–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., and E. Renold. 2014. “F**k Rape: Exploring Affective Intensities in a Feminist Research Assemblage.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 772–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosin, H. 2012. The End of Men: And the Rise of Women. New York: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. 2009. Boys Adrift: The Five Factors Driving the Growing Epidemic of Unmotivated Boys and Underachiving Young Men. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. 2007. “Recovering the Feminine Other: Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender Hegemony.” Theory and Society 36: 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelton, C., B. Francis, and B. Read. 2010. “Brains Before ‘Beauty’? High Achieving Girls, School and Gender Identities.” Educational Studies 36 (2): 185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, C. H. 2013. The War against Boys: How Misguided Policies Are Harming Our Young Men. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A., and A. Y. Jackson. 2014. “Qualitative Data Analysis after Coding.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 715–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J. 2006. “The Role of Sport in the Construction of Masculinities in an English Independent Junior School.” Sport, Education and Society 11 (4): 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2013. “Objects, Bodies and Space: Gender and Embodied Practices of Mattering in the Classroom.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 688–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Tuin, I. 2014. “Diffraction as a Methodology for Feminist Onto-Epistemology: On Encountering Chantal Chawaf and Posthuman Interpellation.” Parallax 20 (3): 231–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., H. Lucey, and J. Melody. 2001. Growing Up Girl: Psychosocial Explorations of Gender and Class. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar