‘It’s not something that we think about with regard to curriculum.’ Exploring gender and equality awareness in higher education curriculum and pedagogy

References

• Adam, B. 2002. “The Gendered Time Politics of Globalization: Of Shadowlands and Elusive Justice.” Feminist Review 70: 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, B. 2003. “Reflexive Modernization Temporalized.” Theory, Culture and Society 20 (2): 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2010. “Happy Objects.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by M. Gregg and G. J. Seigworth, 29–51. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, P., K. Celis, S. L. Childs, I. Engeli, E. Evans, and L. Mügge. 2018. “Contemporary Crises in European Politics: Gender Equality+ Under Threat.” European Journal of Gender and Politics 1 (3): 301–306.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S. 2009. “Black Feminist Praxis: Some Reflections on Pedagogies and Politics in Higher Education.” Race, Ethnicity and Education 12 (1): 79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhopal, K. 2019. “Gender, Ethnicity and Career Progression in UK Higher Education: A Case Study Analysis.” Research Papers in Education, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615118.
   Google Scholar
• Bhopal, K., and H. Henderson. 2019. “Competing Inequalities: Gender Versus Race in Higher Education Institutions in the UK.” Educational Review. [Online]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brayson, K. October 2019. “Positivism and the Peace/Power Dialectic: Feminist Reflections in a Transnational Age.” In Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age, edited by Luca Siliquini-Cinelli, 215–252. New York: Springer Law & Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, Laura. 2013. “Whither Feminism in Higher Education in the Current Crisis?” Feminist Studies 39 (2): 502–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2005. “The Impossibility of Women’s Studies.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 9 (3): 79–101.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J. 2017. “Difference in Higher Education Pedagogies: Gender, Emotion, Shame.” Gender and Education 29 (4): 430–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., and R. Carolissen. 2018. “Gender, Post-Truth Populism and Higher Education Pedagogies.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (5): 543–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, P., G. Crozier, and L. Misiazeck. 2017. Changing Pedagogical Spaces in Higher Education. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P., G. Crozier, B. Read, J. Hall, J. Peat, and B. Francis. 2013. Final Report: Formations of Gender and Higher Education Pedagogies. University of Roehampton. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2200/e5deb62a5a76927736b577482b1e950fcd8f.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., and S. Jackson. 2007. Reconceptualising Lifelong Learning: Feminist Interventions. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N. 1992. “Speaking Nearby: A Conversation with Trinh T. Minh-ha.” Visual Anthropology Review 8 (1): 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Coate, K. 2018. “Teaching Gender: An Inter-Generational Discussion Pedagogy.” Culture and Society 26 (3): 485–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., and L. Manion. 2000. Research Methods in Education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conaghan, J. 2000. “Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law.” Journal of Law and Society 27 (3): 351–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins, Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Colour.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Danvers, E., T. Hinton-Smith, and R. Webb. 2018. “Power, Pedagogy and the Personal: Feminist Ethics in Facilitating a Doctoral Writing Group.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (1): 32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darder, A., and M. Baltodano. 2003. The Critical Pedagogy Reader. New York, NY: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K., M. Evans, and J. Lorber. 2006. “Introduction.” In Handbook of Gender and Women’s Studies, edited by K. Davis, M. Evans, and J. Lorber. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, S., R. Icaza, and O. U. Rutazibwa, eds. 2018. Decolonization and Feminisms in Global Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. 1989. “Why Doesn’t This Feel Empowering? Working Through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy.” Harvard Educational Review 59 (3): 297–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fann, K. T. 1970. “Peirce’s Theory of Abduction.” Martinius Nijhoff - The Hague 47 (182): 377–379.
   Google Scholar
• Feitz, L. 2016. “What Happened to the Women in Women’s Studies? Rethinking the Role of Women’s History in Gender Studies Classes.” Social Sciences 5 (4): 79.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case Study Research.” Qualitative Enquiry 12 (2): 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970, rpt. 2007. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Co.
   Google Scholar
• Giraud, E. 2016. “Feminist Praxis, Critical Theory and Informal Hierarchies.” The Journal of Feminist Scholarship 7: 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J. 1992. “What Can We Do for You? Struggling Over Empowerment in Critical and Feminist Pedagogy.” In Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy, edited by C. Luke and J. Gore, 54–73. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1992. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriated Others.” In Cultural Studies, edited by L. Grossberg, 295–337. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. 2015. Gender Pedagogy: Teaching, Learning and Tracing Gender in Higher Education. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. 2018. “Gender Defender: Response to Kelly Coate’s Review of Gender Pedagogy (Palgrave).” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 26 (3): 489–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, C. 2013. Unconscious Bias and Higher Education. London: Equality Challenge Unit. https://www.ecu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/unconscious-bias-and-higher-education.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton-Smith, T., E. Danvers, and T. Jovanovic. 2018. “Roma Women’s Higher Education Participation: Whose Responsibility?” Gender and Education 30 (7): 811–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton-Smith, T., and L. Seal. 2018. “Performativity, Border-Crossings and Ethics in a Prison-Based Creative Writing Class.” Qualitative Research 19 (5): 560–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. 1983. The Managed Heart and the Commercialization of Human Feeling. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 2010. Teaching Critical Thinking: Practice Wisdom. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. 2009. “Commentary: Gender Interventions in an Age of Disengagement.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 33 (3): 369–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiko Howsona, C. B., K. Coate, and T. de St Croix. 2018. “ Mid-Career Academic Women and the Prestige Economy.” Higher Education Research and Development 33 (1): 533–548.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, S. 2018. “From Historical Chains to Derivative Futures: Title Registries as Time Machines.” Social and Cultural Geography 20 (3): 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, S. 2011. “The Self-Managed Heart: Teaching Gender and Doing Emotional Labour in a Higher Education Institution.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 19 (1): 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C. 2005. “‘Treat me as a Human Being – Don’t Look at me as a Woman’: Femininities and Professional Identities in Further Education.” Gender and Education 17 (4): 387–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. 2005. “Students and Managers Behaving Badly: An Exploratory Analysis of the Vulnerability of Feminist Academics in Anti-Feminist, Market-Driven UK Higher Education.” Women’s Studies International Forum 28 (2–3): 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. 2007. Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. Cambridge: Belknap Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. 2017a. “Gender Literacy.” In Butterfly Politics, 217–224. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. 2017b. “Mainstreaming Feminism in Legal Education.” In Butterfly Politics, 225–241. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Torres, N., R. Vizcaino, J. Wallace, and A. W. Jeong Eun. 2017. “Decolonising Philosophy.” In Decolonising the University, edited by G. Bhambra, D. Gebrial, and K. Nisancioglu, 64–90. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. 1992. “Pedagogical Practice and Problems: Reflections on Teaching about Gender Relations.” In Working Out: New Directions for Women’s Studies, edited by Hilary Hinds, Ann Phoenix and Jackie Stacey, Chapt. 2, 18–28. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. 1998. “All You Need is Love: Feminist Pedagogy for Empowerment and Emotional Labour in the Academy.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 2 (1): 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, D., and I. Richter. 2011. “Changing Times of Feminism and Higher Education: From Community to Employability.” Gender and Education 23 (2): 137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mügge, L., C. Montoya, A. Emejulu, and L. Weldon. 2018. “Intersectionality and the Politics of Knowledge Production.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 1 (1-2): 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Naffine, N. 2002. “In Praise of Legal Feminism.” Legal Studies 22 (1): 71–101.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, E., R. Scullion, and R. Hearn. 2016. “Her Majesty the Student: Marketised Higher Education and the Narcissistic (dis)Satisfactions of the Student-Consumer.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (6): 927–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Periera, M. 2012. “Feminist Theory is Proper Knowledge, but … : The Status of Feminist Scholarship in the Academy.” Feminist Theory 13 (3): 283–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. 2010. Learning Communities and Imagined Social Capital. London, New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ramazanoglu, C., and J. Holland. 2000. Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Read, B. 2018. “Truth, Masculinity and the Anti-Elitist Backlash Against the University in the age of Trump.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (5): 593–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, S. 2010. Feminist Philosophy of Science: History, Contributions, and Challenges Synthese 177 (3): 337–362.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 1995. The Production of Feminist Cultural Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2002. “Institutional Ethnography.” In Qualitative Research in Action, edited by T. May, 17–52. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271–316. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundaram, V., and C. Jackson. 2020. Lad Culture in Higher Education: Sexism, Sexual Harassment and Violence. London: Critical Studies in Gender and Sexuality in Education, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach Scott, J. 2008. Women’s Studies on the Edge. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegman, R. 2005. “The Possibility of Women’s Studies.” In Women’s Studies for the Future: Foundations, Interrogations, Politics, edited by Lapovsky Kennedy and E. Beins, 40–60. New Brunswisk, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wieler, K. 2010. “Freire and a Feminist Pedagogy of Difference.” Harvard Education Review 61 (4): 449–475.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. 2016. “Whatever Happened to the F-Word in Higher Education.” Journal of Gender Studies 25 (2): 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar