Gender equality as a resource and a dilemma: interpretative repertoires in engineering education in Sweden

References

• Arlett, C., F. Lamb, R. Dales, L. Willie, and E. Hurdle. 2010. “Meeting the Needs of Industry: Three Drivers for Change in Engineering Education.” Engineering Education 5 (2): 18–25. doi:10.11120/ened.2010.05020018.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, M., E. Silfver, and A. Danielsson. 2019. “In Search of the New Engineer: Gender, Age, and Social Class in Information About Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (5): 650–665. doi:10.1080/03043797.2018.1523133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1987. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990) 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2005. Giving an Account of Oneself. Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B. 2004. “The Cultural Production of Science in Reform-Based Physics: Girls’ Access, Participation, and Resistance.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (4): 392–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., and A. Johnson. 2007. “Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color: Science Identity as an Analytic Lens.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (8): 1187–1218. doi:10.1002/tea.20237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 1987. Gender and Power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson, A. T. 2012. “Exploring Woman University Physics Students ‘Doing Gender’ and ‘Doing Physics’.” Gender and Education 24 (1): 25–39. doi:10.1080/09540253.2011.565040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, A. T., A. J. Gonsalves, E. Silfver, and M. Berge. 2019. “The Pride and Joy of Engineering? The Identity Work of Male Working-Class Engineering Students.” Engineering Studies 11 (3): 172–195. doi:10.1080/19378629.2019.1663859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and R. Harré. 2001. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” In Discourse Theory and Practice. A Reader, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 261–271. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de los Reyes, P., and D. Mulinari. 2005. Intersektionalitet – kritiska reflektioner över (o)jämlikhetens landskap [Intersectionality – Critical Reflections of the Landscape of (in)Equalities]. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Du, X. Y. 2006. “Gendered Practices of Constructing an Engineering Identity in a Problem-Based Learning Environment.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (1): 35–42. doi:10.1080/03043790500430185.
   Google Scholar
• Edley, N. 2001. “Analysing Masculinity: Interpretative Repertoires, Ideological Dilemmas and Subject Positions.” In Discourse as Data: A Guide to Analysis, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 198–228. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edley, N., and M. Wetherell. 1999. “Imagined Futures: Young Men’s Talk About Fatherhood and Domestic Life.” British Journal of Social Psychology 38 (2): 181–194. doi:10.1348/014466699164112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. 2007. “‘Nuts and Bolts and People’: Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities.” Social Studies of Science 37 (3): 331–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. 2009. “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. II. Gender in/Authenticity and the in/Visibility Paradox.” Engineering Studies 1 (3): 169–189. doi:10.1080/19378620903225059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. 2000. “Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering.” Social Studies of Science 30 (5): 759–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1971. Diskursens ordning [The Discourse Order]. Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1983. “Afterword: The Subject and Power.” In Michel Foucault.Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, edited by L. Dreyfus, and P. Rabinow, 208–226. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, J., J. Mills, S. Franzway, and R. Sharp. 2008. “‘Oh You Must Be Very Clever!’ High-Achieving Women, Professional Power and the Ongoing Negotiation of Workplace Identity.” Gender and Education 20 (3): 223–236. doi:10.1080/09540250801968990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, A. J. 2014. “‘Physics and the Girly Girl—There Is a Contradiction Somewhere’: Doctoral Students’ Positioning Around Discourses of Gender and Competence in Physics.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 9 (2): 503–521. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9447-6.
   Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, A. J., E. Silfver, A. T. Danielsson, and M. Berge. 2019. “‘It’s Not My Dream, Actually’: Students’ Identity Work Across Figured Worlds of Construction Engineering in Sweden.” International Journal of STEM Education 6 (13): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Government Offices of Sweden. 2020. https://www.government.se/information-material/2019/03/gender-equality-policy-in-sweden/.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmo, V., P. Love, and OECD. 2008. Encouraging Student Interest in Science and Technology Studies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, F. 1998. “Engineering Difference: Discourses on Gender, Sexuality and Work in a College of Technology.” Gender and Education 10 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1080/09540259821087.
   Google Scholar
• Holli, A. M., E. Magnusson, and M. Rönnblom. 2005. “Critical Studies of Nordic Discourses on Gender and Gender Equality.” Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 148–152.
   Google Scholar
• Holth, L. 2015. Den Raka och den Krokiga Vägen – Om Genus, Ingenjörer och Teknikkarriärer [The Straight and the Winding Way – Gender, Engineers and Technology Career]. PhD diss., Karlstad University.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2002. “‘That’s Very Rude, I Shouldn’t Be Telling You That’: Older Women Talking About Sex.” Narrative Inquiry 12 (1): 121–143. doi:10.1075/ni.12.1.18jon.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvande, E. 1999. “‘In the Belly of the Beast’: Constructing Femininities in Engineering Organizations.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 6 (3): 305–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, C., and B. Davies. 2000. “Poststructuralist Theory in Practice: Working with “Behaviourally Disturbed” Children.” Qualitative Studies in Education 13 (3): 205–221.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, E. F. 2016. “Judith Butler and Leadership: Reimagining Intelligibility, Social Change, and Leadership Discourse.” Journal of Leadership Studies 10 (2): 69–81. doi:10.1002/jls.21466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Male, S. A., A. Gardner, E. Figueroa, and D. Bennett. 2018. “Investigation of Students’ Experiences of Gendered Cultures in Engineering Workplaces.” European Journal of Engineering Education 43 (3): 360–377. doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1397604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkimurto-Koivumaa, S., and P. Belt. 2016. “About, For, In or Through Entrepreneurship in Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 41 (5): 512–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellström, U. 1999. Män och deras maskiner [Men and Their Machines]. Nora: Nya Doxa.
   Google Scholar
• National agency for Higher Education. 2014. http://www.uka.se/download/18.12f25798156a345894e1f49/1487841916897/040129.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, K. 2012. “Constructing Masculinity in the Building Trades: ‘Most Jobs in the Construction Industry Can be Done by Women.” Gender, Work and Organization 19 (6): 654–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M., J. M. Smith, and L.-T. Ko. 2017. “Counterspaces for Women of Color in STEM Higher Education: Marginal and Central Spaces for Persistence and Success.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (2): 206–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoenix, A. 2006. “Interrogating Intersectionality: Productive Ways of Theorising Multiple Positioning.” Kvinder, køn & Forskning 2-3: 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pincus, I. 2002. The Politics of Gender Equality Policy. A Study of Implementation and Non-implementation in Three Swedish Municipalities. PhD diss., Örebro University.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A., B. Bagihole, and A. Dainty. 2009. “How Women Engineers Do and Undo Gender. Consequences for Gender and Equality.” Gender, Work and Organization 16 (4): 411–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A., B. Bagihole, and A. Dainty. 2011. “A Poisoned Chalice? Why UK Women Engineering and Technology Students May Receive More ‘Help’ Than Their Male Peers.” Gender and Education 23 (5): 585–599. doi:10.1080/09540253.2010.527826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, D., and D. Wiliam. 1999. “‘I’ll be Nothing’: Structure, Agency and the Construction of Identity Through Assessment.” British Educational Research Journal 25 (3): 343–354. doi:10.1080/0141192990250305.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, F. L., and B. A. Nosek. 2015. “On the Gender-Science Stereotypes Held by Scientists: Explicit Accord with Gender-Ratios, Implicit Accord with Scientific Identity.” Frontiers in Pshycology 6 (415): 1–19. www.frontiersin.org.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stepulevage, L., and S. Plumeridge. 1998. “Women Taking Positions Within Computer Science.” Gender and Education 10 (3): 313–326.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. 2001. “Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytical Research.” In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 5–48. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tonso, K. 2006. “Student Engineers and Engineer Identity: Campus Engineer Identities as Figured World.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 1 (2): 273–307.
   Google Scholar
• UKÄ. 2020. Universitetskanslersämbetet Analysavdelningen, löpnummer 2020-03-23 https://www.uka.se/download/18.4dcfa4c0171537ea94033d3/1587032843135/Statistisk%20analys%20examinerade%202020-04-16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. 2001. “Engineering Identities.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 (1): 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., and J. Potter. 1988. “Discourse Analysis and the Identification of Interpretative Repertoires.” In Analysing Everyday Explanation. A Casebook of Methods, edited by C. Antaki, 168–183. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates. 2001. Discourse Theory and Practice. A Reader. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar