Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: The role of risk perception and risk communication

References

• Alhakami AS, Slovic P. A psychological atudy of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Decision Research Report. 1993; 93–97
   Google Scholar
• Beck PW. Nuclear energy in the twenty-first century: Examination of a contentious subject. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 1999; 24: 113–137
   Google Scholar
• Becker SM. Emergency communication and information issues in terrorist events involving radioactive material. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 2004; 2(3)195–207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bord RJ, O'Connor RE, Fisher A. In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?. Public Understanding of Science 2000; 9: 205–218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouder F, Rogers MB, Krieger K, Löfstedt R. L. Understanding and communicating the risks of nuclear waste. The future of nuclear power in Europe: The role of public perceptions and risk communication, MB Rogers, K Krieger, F Bouder, RL Lofstedt, 2006, Unpublished report
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley H. Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia. Public Understanding of Science 2000; 9: 313–333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carle B, Charron S, Milochevitch A, Hardeman F. An inquiry of the opinions of the French and Belgian populations as regards risk. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2004; 111: 21–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danieli Y, Brom D, Sills J. The trauma of terrorism: Sharing knowledge and shared care, an international handbook. The Hayworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press, New YorkUSA 2005
   Google Scholar
• Earle TC. Thinking aloud about trust: A protocol analysis of trust in risk management. Risk Analysis 2004; 24(1)169–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser JR. Public perception of risk. Report prepared for Foresight Office of Science and Technology (July, 2004). 2004
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. Eurobarometer 59. Spring 2003. 2003, Retrieved from (http//:Europe.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb59/eb59_rapport_final_en.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B. Assessing and communicating the risks of terrorism. Science and technology in a vulnerable world, EH Teich, SD Nelson, SJ Lita. AAAS, Washington, DC 2002
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Bruine de Bruin W, Perrin W, Downs J. Travel risks in a time of terror judgements and choices. Risk Analysis 2003; 24(5)1301–1309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn J. Nuclear stigma. The social amplification of risk, N. Pidgeon, RE Kasperson, P. Slovic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 2003; 326–352
   Google Scholar
• Freedman L. The politics of warning. Terrorism and risk communication. Intelligence and National Security 2005; 20(3)379–418
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton CS, Ursano RJ, Norwood AE, Holloway HH. Trauma, terrorism, and disaster. Terrorism and disaster: Individual and community mental health interventions, RJ Ursano, CS Fullteron, A. E. Norwood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 2003; 1–21
   Google Scholar
• Gould LC, Gardner GT, DeLuca DR, Tiemann AR, Doob LW, Stolwijk JAJ. Perceptions of technological risks and benefits. Russell Sage Foundation, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Ganor B. Terrorism as a strategy of psychological warfare. The trauma of terrorism: Sharing knowledge and shared care, an international handbook, Y. Danieli, D. Brom, J. Sills. The Hayworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press, New York 2005; 33–43
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G. Out of the frying pan into the fire: Behavioural reactions to terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis 2006; 26(2)347–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray GM, Ropeik DP. Dealing with the dangers of fear: The role of risk communication. Health Affairs 2002; 21(6)106–114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimston MC, Beck P. Double or quits: The global future of civil nuclear energy. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Gusterson H. How not to construct a radioactive waste incinerator. Science, Technology & Human Values 2000; 25(3)332–351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug P. Public acceptance: A wake-up call from the people of Europe. World Nuclear Association Annual Symposium. 2002; 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Henderson JN, Henderson JC, Raskob GE, Boatright DT. Chemical (VX) terrorist threat: Public knowledge, attitudes and responses. Biosecurity & Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science 2004; 2(3)1–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). The radiological accident in Goiania. Vienna, IAEA 1988
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson RE, Golding D, Tuler S. Societal distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues 1992; 48: 161–187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, Slovic P. The social amplification of risk, In N. Pidgeon, RE Kasperson, P. Slovic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 2003; 13–46
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson RE, Palmlund I. Evaluating Risk Communication. The social contours of risk. Volume 1: Publics, risk communication and the social amplification of risk, JX Kasperson, RE Kasperson. Earthscan, London 2005; 51–67
   Google Scholar
• Lindy JD, Grace MC, Green BL. Responses of individuals and groups to consequences of technological disasters and radiation exposure. Terrorism and disaster: Individual and community mental health interventions, RJ Ursano, CS Fullteron, AE Norwood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 2003; 209–235
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt RE. Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK 2005
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt R. Risk communication: Pitfalls and promises. European Review 2003; 11(3)417–435
   Google Scholar
• Lofstedt R, Frewer L. Risk & modern society. Earthscan, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Lowe T, Brown K, Dessai S, Doria MF, Haynes K, Vincent K. Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science 2006; 15: 435–457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers G. Rhetorics of environmental sustainability: Common spaces and places. Environment and Planning A 1998; 30: 333–353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North CS. Exploring the myths of coping with a national trauma: A longitudinal study of responses to the September 11th attacks. The trauma of terrorism: Sharing knowledge and shared care, an international handbook, Y. Danieli, D. Brom, J. Sills. The Hayworth Maltreatment & Trauma Press, New YorkUSA 2005; 143–155
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis 1999; 19(3)461–471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P. The social amplification of risk. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 2003
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis 2003; 23(5)961–972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn O, Levine D. Credibility and trust in risk communication. Communicating Risks to the Public, RE Kasperson, PJM Stallen. Klewer, The Hague 1991
   Google Scholar
• Rogers MB. Factors affecting public confidence in government communication strategies. 2007, Unpublished Report for the Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Rogers MB, Krieger K, Bouder F, Lofstedt R. L. The future of nuclear power in europe: the role of public perceptions and risk communication. 2006, Unpublished Report
   Google Scholar
• Rubin GJ, Brewin CR, Greenberg N, Simpson J, Wessely S. Psychological and behavioural reactions to the 7 July London bombings. A cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of Londoners. British Medical Journal 2005; 331: 606–611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw J, Collier D. Communication of uncertainty. Report for the Food Standards Agency (FSA), (April). 2003; 1–124
   Google Scholar
• BRubin SheppardGJ, Wardman JK, Wessely S. Terrorism and dispelling the myth of a panic prone public. Journal of Public Health Policy 2006; 27(3)216–245
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist M, Keller C, Kiers HAL. A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis 2005; 25(1)211–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987; 236: 280–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. Beyond numbers: A broader perspective on risk perception and risk communication. Acceptable evidence, DG. Mayo, RD Hollander. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. Risk Analysis 2004; 24(2)311–322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Rating the risks. Environment 1979; 21(4)14–20, 36–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough, RC Schwing, W. A. Albers, Jr. Plenum, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1981; A376: 17–34
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Characterizing perceived risk. Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology, RW Kates, C. Hohenemser, J. Kasperson. Westview, Boulder, CO 1985; 91–125
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. The psychometric study of risk perception. Risk evaluation and management, Vincent T. Covello, Joshua Menkos, Jeryl Mumpower. Pienum Publishing Corporation, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y. Psychological dimensions of risk assessment: Risk perception and risk communication. Progress in Nuclear Energy 1998; 32(3/4)243–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo CW, Shanahan J. Social research on climate change: Where have we been, where we are, and where we might go. Public Understanding of Science 2000; 9: 199–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursano RJ, Fullteron CS, Norwood A. E. Terrorism and disaster: Individual and community mental health interventions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 2003; 1–21
   Google Scholar
• Van Asselt MBA, Rotmans J. Uncertainty in perspective. Global Environmental Change 1996; 6(2)121–157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderford ML. Breaking new ground in WMD risk communication: The pre-event messages development project. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science 2004; 2(3)193–194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weisaeth L, Tønnessen A. Terrorism and disaster: Individual and community mental health interventions, In RJ Ursano, CS Fullteron, AE Norwood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 2003; 236–258
   Google Scholar
• Whalley MG, Brewin CR. Mental health following terrorist attacks. British Journal of Psychiatry 2007; 190: 94–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedemann PM, Clauberg M, Schutz H. The social amplification of risk, In N. Pidgeon, RE Kasperson, P. Slovic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 2003; 286–301
   Google Scholar
• Wray R, Jupka P. What does the public want to know in the event of a terrorist attack using plague?. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice and Science 2004; 2(3)208–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1992; 1: 281–304
   Google Scholar