Circles of support and accountability (CoSA): a review of the development of CoSA and its international implementation

References

• Armstrong, S., Chistyakova, Y., Mackenzie, S., & Malloch, M. (2008). Circles of support & accountability: Considerations of the feasibility of pilots in Scotland (Research Report). Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S., & Wills, D. (2014). A review of the Fife Circles of Support and Accountability project commissioned by Sacro — Final report (Research Report). Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation (User Report 2007–06). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cesaroni, C. (2001). Releasing sex offenders into the community through “Circles of Support”: A means of reintegrating the “worst of the worst.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34, 85–98. doi:10.1300/J076v34n02_06
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., Brown, S., & Völlm, B. (2017). Circles of support and accountability for sex offenders: A systematic review of outcomes. Sex Abuse, 29, 446–478. doi:10.1177/1079063215603691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrections and Conditional Release Act, S.C., 1992. Retrieved from https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-44.6/
   Google Scholar
• Deborah. (2008). HTV circles — six years of safer communities: Six year report (Research Report). London: Quaker Peace and Social Witness.
   Google Scholar
• Duwe, G. (2013). Can Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 143–165. doi:10.1177/1079063212453942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duwe, G. (2018). Minnesota Circles of Support and Accountability (MnCoSA) at 50: Updated results from a randomized controlled trial (Research Report). St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: Department of Corrections. Retrieved from https://mn.gov/doc/assets/2018%20MnCOSA%20 Outcome%20Evaluation_tcm1089-326700.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Duwe, G., & Donnay, W. (2008). The impact of Megan’s Law on sex offender recidivism: The Minnesota experience. Criminology, 46, 411–446. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00114.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, I. A., & Beech, A. R. (2013). A U.K. cost-benefit analysis of circles of support and accountability interventions. Sex Abuse, 25, 211–229. doi:10.1177/1079063212443385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, I. A., & Zajac, G. (2015). The implementation of circles of support and accountability in the United States. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 113–123. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Harris, A., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2792–2813. doi:10.1177/0886260514526062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2007). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis 2007-01 (Research Report). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada. doi:10.1037/a0014421
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). STATIC-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sexual offenders (Research Report No. 1999-02). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Corrections Research, Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://ww2.ps-sp.gc.ca/publications/corrections/199902_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hanvey, S. (2008). HTV circles — six years of safer communities: Six year report (Research Report). London: Quaker Peace and Social Witness.
   Google Scholar
• Höing, M., Bogaerts, S., & Vogelvang, B. (2017a). Volunteers in circles of support and accountability job demands, job resources, and outcome. Sex Abuse, 29, 541–562. doi:10.1177/1079063215612441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höing, M., & Vogelvang, B. (2011). CoSA in Nederland: Implementatieonderzoek pilotfase (Research Report). Hertogenbosch: Programmabureau Circles-NL.
   Google Scholar
• Höing, M., Vogelvang, B., & Bogaerts, S. (2017b). “I am a different man now” — sex offenders in circles of support and accountability: A prospective study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61, 751–772. doi:10.1177/0306624X15612431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitson-Boyce, R. (2018). Do CoSA work? A review of the literature. In H. Elliott, K. Hocken, R. Lievesley, N. Blagden, B. Winder, & P. Banyard (Eds.), Sexual crime and circles of support and accountability (pp. 63–96). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kitson-Boyce, R., Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Dillon, G. (2018). “This Time It’s Different” Preparing for Release Through a Prison-Model of CoSA: A Phenomenological and Repertory Grid Analysis. Sexual Abuse. doi:10.1177/1079063218775969
   Google Scholar
• Kitson-Boyce, R., Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Dillon, G. (2019). Supporting desistance through ambiguous practice: What can be learned from the first prison-based model of CoSA in England and Wales? Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 19, 186–209. doi:10.1080/24732850.2019.1571362
   Google Scholar
• McCartan, K., Kemshall, H., Westwood, S., Solle, J., MacKenzie, G., & Pollard, A. (2014). Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA): A case file review of two pilots. Ministry of Justice Analytical Summary. London: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, L., Brodsky, D., Brackel, J., Petrunik, M., Fedoroff, P., & Grudzinskas, A. (2009). Community based management of sex offenders: An examination of sex offender registries and community notification in the United States and Canada. In F. M. Saleh, A. J. Grudzinskas, J. M. Bradford, & D. J. Brodsky (Eds.), Sex offenders: Identification, risk assessment, treatment, and legal issues (pp. 412–424). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, L., Gray, J., & Fedoroff, P. An Examination of the Psychological Impact of Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA) on the program’s core members and volunteers. Funded by Canadian Psychiatric Association, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, T. (2007). Forgiving justice: A Quaker vision for criminal justice Swarthmore Lecture 2000. London: Quaker Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nigh, H. (1996). Circles of Support and Accountability for released sex offenders: One community’s story. In Church Council on Justice and Corrections, Satisfying Justice, 31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Petrunik, M., Murphy, L., & Fedoroff, P. (2008). American and Canadian approaches to sex offenders: A study of the politics of dangerousness. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 21, 111–123. doi:10.1525/fsr.2008.21.2.111
   Google Scholar
• Thurber, A. (1998). Understanding offender reintegration. Forum on Corrections Research, 10, 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• van Rensburg, J. (2012). The dawn of circles of support and accountability in New Zealand. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 4, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. (2018). A history of the development of circles of support and accountability. In H. Elliott, K. Hocken, R. Lievesley, N. Blagden, B. Winder, & P. Banyard (Eds.), Sexual crime and circles of support and accountability (pp. 15–41). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., Bates, A., & Völlm, B. (2010). Cicles of Support and Accountability: An innovative approach to manage high-risk sex offenders in the community. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 48–57. doi:10.2174/1874917801003010048
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Cortoni, F., & McWhinnie, A. (2009). Circles of support and accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 412–430. doi:10.1177/1079063209347724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Huculak, B., & McWhinnie, A. (2002). Restorative justice innovations in Canada. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 363–380. doi:10.1002/bsl.498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., McWhinnie, A., Picheca, J., Prinzo, M., & Cortoni, F. (2007). Circles of support and accountability: Engaging volunteers in the management of high risk sex offenders. The Howard Journal, 46, 1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2007.00450.x
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Picheca, J., & Prinzo, M. (2005). Circles of support and accountability: An evaluation of the pilot project in South-Central Ontario (Research Report). Ottawa: Correctional Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Winder, B. (2018). Effectively supporting people with sexual convictions to reintegrate within the community. Keynote presentation at Inside Government’s Offender Management 2018 Forum, London, 21 March 2018.
   Google Scholar