1,876
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Mental disorder and social deviance

ORCID Icon &
Pages 478-485 | Received 30 Jul 2020, Accepted 24 Aug 2020, Published online: 05 Oct 2020

References

  • Aftab, A. (2019a). Social misuse of disorder designation, part II: The dysfunction defense. Psychiatric Times. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/social-misuse-disorder-designation-part-ii-dysfunction-defense(a)
  • Aftab, A. (2019b). Social misuse of disorder designation, Part III: Harm and ethical validity. Psychiatric Times. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/social-misuse-disorder-designation-part-iii-harm-and-ethical-validity(b)
  • Aftab, A. (2020). Weaving conceptual and empirical work in psychiatry: Kenneth S. Kendler. Psychiatric Times. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/weaving-conceptual-and-empirical-work-psychiatry-kenneth-s-kendler-md
  • Aftab, A., Chen, C., & McBride, J. (2017). Flibanserin and its discontents. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 20(2), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-016-0693-6
  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association.
  • Bayer, R. (1987). Homosexuality and American psychiatry: The politics of diagnosis. Princeton University Press.
  • Chapman, R. (2020). Neurodiversity, disability, wellbeing. In H. B. Rosqvist, N. Chown, & A. Steinning (Eds.), Neurodiversity studies: A new critical paradigm (pp. 57–72). Routledge.
  • Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind. Macmillan.
  • De Haan, S. (2020). Enactive psychiatry. Cambridge University Press.
  • Decker, H. S. (2013). The making of DSM-III: A diagnostic manual’s conquest of American psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
  • Drescher, J. (2015). Out of DSM: Depathologizing homosexuality. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 5(4), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs5040565
  • First, M. B., & Wakefield, J. C. (2013). Diagnostic criteria as dysfunction indicators: bridging the chasm between the definition of mental disorder and diagnostic criteria for specific disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 58(12), 663–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371305801203
  • Goode E (Ed). (2015). The handbook of deviance. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Haslam, N., Ban, L., & Kaufmann, L. (2007). Lay conceptions of mental disorder: The folk psychiatry model. Australian Psychologist, 42(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060701280615
  • Jost, A. (2009). Mad Pride and the medical model. Hastings Centre Report, 39(4), c3.
  • Logan, E. L., Thornton, J. A., Kane, R. T., & Breen, L. J. (2018). Social support following bereavement: The role of beliefs, expectations, and support intentions. Death Studies, 42(8), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1382610
  • Merskey, H., & Shafran, B. (1986). Political hazards in the diagnosis of ‘sluggish schizophrenia’. The British Journal of Psychiatry : The Journal of Mental Science, 148(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.148.3.247
  • Murphy, D. (2006). Psychiatry in the scientific image. MIT Press.
  • Nielsen, K., & Ward, T. (2020). Mental disorder as both natural and normative: Developing the normative dimension of the 3e conceptual framework for psychopathology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 40(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000118
  • Powell, R., & Scarffe, E. (2019). Rethinking “Disease”: A fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(9), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105465
  • Radden, J. H. (2012). Recognition rights, mental health consumers and reconstructive cultural semantics. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM, 7(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-7-6
  • Rashed, M. A. (2019). Madness and the demand for recognition: A philosophical inquiry into identity and mental health activism. Oxford University Press.
  • Rashed, M. A., & Bingham, R. (2014). Can psychiatry distinguish social deviance from mental disorder? Philosophy. Psychiatry, & Psychology, 21(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2014.0043
  • Rounsaville, B. J., Alarcón, R. D., & Andrews, G. (2002). Basic nomenclature issues for DSM-V. In A research agenda for DSM-V (pp. 1–29). American Psychiatric Association.
  • Sadler, J. Z., Jotterand, F., Lee, S. C., & Inrig, S. (2009). Can medicalization be good? Situating medicalization within bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 30(6), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-009-9122-4
  • Schwartz, P. H. (2017). Progress in defining disease: Improved approaches and increased impact. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 42(4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhx012
  • Scull, A. T. (1977). Madness and segregative control: The rise of the insane asylum. Social Problems, 24(3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/800085
  • Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (1982). The definition and diagnosis of mental disorder. In W. R. Gove (Ed.), Deviance and mental illness (pp. 15–31). Sage.
  • Szasz, T. (1997). Manufacture of madness: A comparative study of the inquisition and the mental health movement. Syracuse University Press.
  • Wakefield, J. C. (1992). Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A conceptual critique of DSM-III-R’s definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review, 99(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.232
  • Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The concept of mental disorder: Diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry : Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 6(3), 149–156.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.