9,435
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Bio-psycho-social interaction: an enactive perspective

Pages 471-477 | Received 24 Aug 2020, Accepted 28 Sep 2020, Published online: 25 Nov 2020

References

  • Bolton, D., & Gillett, G. (2019). The biopsychosocial model of health and disease: New philosophical and scientific developments. Springer Nature.
  • Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., & Kalis, A. (2018). Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42(E2), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17002266
  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  • Cooper, R. (2017). Where’s the problem? Considering Laing and Esterson’s account of schizophrenia, social models of disability, and extended mental disorder. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 38(4), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-017-9413-0
  • Davies, W. (2016). Externalist psychiatry. Analysis, 76(3), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anw038
  • de Haan, S. (2020a). Enactive psychiatry. Cambridge University Press.
  • de Haan, S. (2020b). An enactive approach to psychiatry. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 27(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2020.0001
  • Di Paolo, E. (2009). Extended life. Topoi, 28(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9042-3
  • Di Paolo, E., & Thompson, E. (2014). The enactive approach. In L. Shapiro. The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 68–78). Routledge.
  • Engel, G. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.847460
  • Engel, G. L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 137(5), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.137.5.535
  • Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. (2009). Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-009-9140-8
  • Fuchs, T. (2018). Ecology of the brain. Oxford University Press.
  • Ghaemi, S. N. (2009). The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 195(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.109.063859
  • Kendler, K. S. (2010). The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model: Reconciling art and science in psychiatry [Book review]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(8), 999–1000. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10020268
  • Nielsen, K., & Ward, T. (2020). Phenomena complexes as targets of explanation in psychopathology: The relational analysis of phenomena approach. Theory & Psychology, 30(2), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320906462
  • Oyama, S. (1985/2000). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Duke university press.
  • Pescosolido, B. A., Martin, J. K., Long, J. S., Medina, T. R., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2010). “A disease like any other”? A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(11), 1321–1330. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09121743
  • Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Harvard University Press.
  • Roberts, T., Krueger, J., & Glackin, S. (2019). Psychiatry beyond the brain: Externalism, mental health, and autistic spectrum disorder. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(3), 51–68.
  • Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Harvard University Press.
  • Van Oudenhove, L., & Cuypers, S. (2014). The relevance of the philosophical ‘mind-body problem’ for the status of psychosomatic medicine: A conceptual analysis of the biopsychosocial model. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 17(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9521-1
  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.