Accountability of UK charities

References

• ASC . 1988 . Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) 2, Accounting by Charities London
   Google Scholar
• Burt , E. and Taylor , J. 2001 . Striking the regulatory balance in the unique case of the voluntary sector . Public Money & Management , 21 ( 4 ) : 297 – 300 .
   Google Scholar
• Charity Commission . 2004 . Transparency and Accountability London
   Google Scholar
• Charity Commission . 2005 . Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended Practice London
   Google Scholar
• Charity Commission . 2009 . www.charitycommission.gov.uk/registeredcharities/factfigures.asp
   Google Scholar
• CharityFacts . 2007 . www.charityfacts.org/resources/for_the_media/facts_and_figures/key_facts_2.html
   Google Scholar
• Connolly , C. and Hyndman , N. 2001 . A comparative study on the impact of revised SORP 2 on British and Irish charities . Financial Accountability and Management , 17 ( 1 ) : 73 – 97 .
   Google Scholar
• Connolly , C. and Hyndman , N. 2004 . Performance reporting: a comparative study of British and Irish charities . British Accounting Review , 36 : 127 – 154 .
   Google Scholar
• Coy , D. , Fischer , M. and Gordon , T. 2001 . Public accountability: a new paradigm for college and university annual reports . Critical Perspectives in Accounting , 12 : 1 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim , A. 2003 . Making sense of accountability: conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits . Nonprofit Management and Leadership , 14 : 191 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Edwards , M. and Hulme , D. 1996 . Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid in nongovernmental organizations . World Development , 24 ( 6 ) : 961 – 973 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin , R. 2003 . “ Democratic accountability: the distinctiveness of the third sector ” . In Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations Working Paper No. 19 , Harvard University .
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie , J. , Petty , R. , Yongvanich , K. and Picceri , F. 2004 . Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting . Journal of Intellectual Capital , 5 ( 2 ) : 282 – 291 .
   Google Scholar
• Haniffa , R. and Cooke , T. 2005 . The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting . Journal of Accounting and Public Policy , 24 ( 5 ) : 391 – 430 .
   Google Scholar
• Hill , N. 2001 . “ Called to book ” . In Guardian (24 October)
   Google Scholar
• Home Office . 2003 . Charities and Not for Profits: A Modern Legal Framework: The Government's Response to Private Action—Public Benefit , London : Home Office .
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman , N. 1990 . Charity accounting . Financial Accountability and Management , 6 : 295 – 307 .
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman , N. and Eden , R. 2002 . Executive agencies, performance targets and external reporting . Public Money & Management , 22 ( 1 ) : 17 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Jones , R. and Pendlebury , M. 1996 . Public Sector Accounting , London : Pitman Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Little , M. 2005 . Anger over admin cost league table . Third Sector , 26 January
   Google Scholar
• Lumley , T. , Langerman , C. and Brookes , M. 2005 . Funding Success: NPC's Approach to Analysing Charities , London : New Philanthropy Capital .
   Google Scholar
• NCVO . 2006 . The UK Voluntary Sector Almanac 2006 London
   Google Scholar
• Pratten , B. 2004 . Accountability and Transparency , London : NCVO .
   Google Scholar
• Slim , H. 2002 . “ By what authority: the legitimacy and accountability of non-governmental organizations ” . See www.jha.ac/articles/a082.htm
   Google Scholar
• Strategy Unit Report . 2002 . Private Action, Public Benefit: A Review of Charities and the Wider Not-for-Profit Sector , London : Cabinet Office .
   Google Scholar