Comparing the content of regulatory impact assessments in the UK and the EU

References

• Ambler , T. , Chittenden , F. and Xiao , D. 2007 . The Burden of Regulation: Who is Watching Out for Us? , London : British Chambers of Commerce .
   Google Scholar
• Cecot , C. , Hahn , R. , Renda , A. and Schrefler , L. 2008 . An evaluation of the quality of impact assessment in the European Union with lessons for the US and the EU . Regulation and Governance , 2 ( 4 ) : 405 – 424 . (doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00044.x)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament . 2011 . Resolution on Guaranteeing Independent Impact Assessments (2010/2016(INI)). ,
   Google Scholar
• Evaluation Partnership . 2007 . Evaluation of the Commission's Impact Assessment System. Annexes to the Final Report Richmond
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons , M. and Parker , D. 2012 . Impact assessments and better regulation: the role of the UK's Regulatory Policy Committee . Public Money & Management , 32 ( 4 ) : 257 – 264 . (doi:10.1080/09540962.2012.691302)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons , M. and Parker , D. 2013 . New development: Recent changes to the UK's regulatory process . Public Money & Management , 33 ( 6 )
   Google Scholar
• Hahn , R. W. and Dudley , P. 2004 . How Well Does the Government Do Cost-Benefit Analysis? , Washington, D.C. : AEI Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies .
   Google Scholar
• Hertin , J. , Turnpenny , J. , Jordan , A. , Nilsson , M. , Russel , D. and Nykvist , B. 2009 . Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante policy assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process . Environment and Planning A , 41 ( 5 ) : 1185 – 1200 . (doi:10.1068/a40266)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office . 2009 . Delivering High Quality Impact Assessments , London : The Stationery Office .
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson , M. , Jordan , A. , Turnpenny , J. , Hertin , J. , Nykvist , B. and Russel , D. 2008 . The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy-making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union . Policy Sciences , 41 : 335 – 355 . (doi:10.1007/s11077-008-9071-1)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens , S. , Rayner , T. and Bina , O. 2004 . New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research . Environment and Planning A , 36 ( 11 ) : 1943 – 1959 . (doi:10.1068/a36281)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli , C. M. 2005 . Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment . Journal of European Public Policy , 12 ( 5 ) : 924 – 943 . (doi:10.1080/13501760500161621)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli , C. M. 2009 . Measuring policy learning: regulatory impact assessment in Europe . Journal of European Public Policy , 16 ( 8 ) : 1145 – 1164 . (doi:10.1080/13501760903332647)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli , C. M. 2010 . Rationality, power, management and symbols: four images of regulatory impact assessment . Scandinavian Political Studies , 33 ( 2 ) : 164 – 188 . (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00245.x)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli , C. M. and Meuwese , A. C. M. 2010 . Hard questions, hard solutions: proceduralisation through impact assessment in the EU . West European Politics , 33 ( 1 ) : 136 – 153 . (doi:10.1080/01402380903354189)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renda , A. 2006 . Impact Assessment in the EU: the State of the Art and the Art of the State , Brussels : Centre for European Policy Studies .
   Google Scholar
• Renda , A. 2011 . Law and Economics in the RIA World: Improving the Use of Economic Analysis in Public Policy and Legislation , Cambridge : Intersentia .
   Google Scholar
• Wiener , J. B. and Alemanno , A. 2010 . Comparing Regulatory Oversight Bodies across the Atlantic: the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the US and the Impact Assessment Board in the EU , Durham : Duke University School of Law .
   Google Scholar