276
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Theme: Financial sustainability and cutback management: global issues for public organizations

Interpreting financial balance in local government: a case study from Finland

References

  • Association of Local and Regional Authorities (2012), Revision on Depreciation for Municipalities and Joint Municipalities (Helsinki).
  • Bevan, G. and Hood, C. (2006), What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84, 3, pp. 517–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x
  • Caccia, L. and Steccolini, I. (2005), Accounting change in Italian local governments: what's beyond managerial fashion? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 2/3, pp. 154–174.
  • Caperchione, E. (2006), The New Public Management: A Perspective for Finance Practitioners (FEE, Brussels).
  • Carmeli, A. and Cohen, A. (2001), The financial crisis in the local authorities in Israel: a resource-based analysis. Public Administration, 79, 4, pp. 839–913. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00285
  • Dollery, B. E., Byrnes, J. D. and Crase, L. (2007), Too tough a nut to crack: determining financial sustainability in Australian local government. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 13, 2, pp. 110–133.
  • Dollery, B. E.. Crase, L. and Byrnes, J. D. (2011), The local capacity, local community and local governance dimensions of sustainability in Australian local government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 8/9, pp. 162–183.
  • Ellwood, S. (2001), Accruals accounting approaches in the UK public sector: diversity and convergence. In Bac, A. D. (Ed), International Comparative Issues in Government Accounting (Kluwer, Boston).
  • Guthrie, J. (1998), Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector— rhetoric or reality? Financial Accountability & Management, 14, 1, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1111/1468-0408.00047
  • Honadle, B. W. (2003), The states’ role in US local government fiscal crisis. International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 13, pp. 1431–1472. doi: 10.1081/PAD-120024405
  • Ijiri, Y. (1967), The Foundations of Accounting Measurement (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).
  • Ijiri, Y. (1975), Theory of Accounting Measurement (American Accounting Association, Sarasota).
  • Jones, S. and Walker, R. G. (2007), Explanators of local government distress. Abacus, 43, 3, pp. 396–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2007.00238.x
  • Lapsley, I. and Mitchell, F. (Eds) (1996), Accounting and Performance Measurement. Issues in the Private and Public Sector (Paul Chapman Publishing, London).
  • Lapsley, I., Mussari, R. and Paulsson, G. (2009). On the adoption of accrual accounting in the public sector. A self-evident and problematic. European Accounting Review, 18, 4, pp. 719–723. doi: 10.1080/09638180903334960
  • March, J. G. (1987), Ambiguity and accounting: the elusive link between information and decision-making. Accounting, Organization and Society, 12, pp. 153–168. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90004-3
  • Murray, D. and Dollery, B. E. (2005), Local council performance monitoring in New South Wales: are ‘at risk’ councils really at risk? Economic Papers, 24, 4, pp. 332–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2005.tb01007.x
  • Ng, Y.-K. (2004), Welfare Economics: Towards a More Complete Analysis (Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke).
  • Noordegraaf, M. and Abma, T. (2003), Management by measurement? Public management practices amidst ambiguity. Public Administration, 81, 4, pp. 853–871. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00374.x
  • Pallot, J. (1992), Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounts. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5, 1, pp. 38–59. doi: 10.1108/09513579210008244
  • Simon, H. A. (1955), A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp. 99–118. doi: 10.2307/1884852
  • Simon, H. A. (1982), Models of Bounded Rationality: Behavioral Economics and Business Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge).
  • Vakkuri, J. and Meklin, P. (2006), Ambiguity in performance measurement: a theoretical approach to organizational uses of performance measurement. Financial Accountability & Management, 22, 3, pp. 235–250. doi: 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00401.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.