Research productivity and research system attitudes

References

• Amabile, T. (1998), How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review (Sep.–Oct.), pp. 77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. and Trowler, P. R. (2001), Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines (SRHE/Open University Press, Maidenhead).
   Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M. (2013), Facts and fads in academic research management: the effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia. Research Policy, 42, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, L. (2002), A list of published papers is no measure of value: the present system rewards quantity, not quality—but hasty changes could be as bad. Nature, 419, 6910, p. 877. doi: 10.1038/419877a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, L. (2003), Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications. Research Policy, 32, pp. 143–155. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00007-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R., Hillyard, S. and Reed, M. (2007), Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. (2007), Publish or Perish. See www.harzing.com/pop.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. (2009), Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation. Higher Education, 57, 4, pp. 393–404. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9154-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. (2012), Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41, pp. 251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual's scientific output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A., 102, pp. 16569–16572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S. (2000), Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27, 1, pp. 23–36. doi: 10.3152/147154300781782156
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. and Bozeman, B. (2005), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 5, pp. 673–702. doi: 10.1177/0306312705052359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M. and Ross, S. (2011), Research funding systems in Australia, New Zealand and the UK: Policy settings and perceived effects. Policy and Politics, 39, 3, pp. 379–398.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M. (2013), Academic Governance: Disciplines and Policy (Routledge, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, L. (2006), The Research Game in Academic Life (SRHE/Open University Press, Maidenhead).
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, T. (2013), The paradox of outcomes—the more we measure the less we understand. Public Money & Management, 33, 3, pp. 213–216. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.785707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. and Considine, M. (2000), The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
   Google Scholar
• McNay, I. (2007), Research assessment; researcher autonomy. In Kayrooz, C. et al. (Eds), Autonomy in Social Science Research: The View from the United Kingdom and Australian Universities (Elsevier, Oxford), pp 183–216.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. J. (2004), The research assessment exercise in English universities, 2001. Higher Education, 48, pp. 461–482. doi: 10.1023/B:HIGH.0000046717.11717.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najman, J. M. and Hewitt, B. (2003), The validity of publication and citation counts for sociology and other selected disciplines. Journal of Sociology, 39, 1, pp. 62–80. doi: 10.1177/0004869003039001320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterloh, M. and Frey, B. S. (2009), Research Governance in Academia: Are There Alternatives to Academic Rankings? (Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich).
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1999), Predicting institutional research performance from published indicators: a test of a classification of Australian university types. Higher Education, 37, 4, pp. 341–358. doi: 10.1023/A:1003692220956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talib, A. A. (2001), The continuing behavioural modification of academics since the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise. Higher Education Review, 33, pp. 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Talib, A. A. (2003), The offspring of NPM in English universities: ‘accountability’, ‘performance measurement’, ‘goal-setting’ and the prodigal child—the RAE. Public Management Review, 5, 4, pp. 573–583. doi: 10.1080/1471903032000178590
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. and Gläser, J. (Eds) (2007), The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems (Springer, Dordrecht).
   Google Scholar