1,348
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
THEME: PUBLIC PROCUREMENT POLICY AND PRACTICE—INTERNATIONAL LESSONS AND DEBATES

New development: Can ‘social value’ requirements on public authorities be used in procurement to increase women's participation in the UK construction industry?

References

  • Bagilhole, B. (2014), Equality and opportunity in construction. In Munn, M. (Ed), Building the Future: Women in Construction (Smith Institute, London), pp. 19–28.
  • BIS (2013), Women in the Workplace: First Report of Session 2013–14 (House of Commons, London).
  • Cabinet Office (2012), Procurement Policy Note: The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012—Advice for Commissioners and Procurers (London).
  • Cabinet Office (2014), The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012: One Year On (London).
  • CRE (2003), Race Equality and Public Procurement: A Guide for Public Authorities and Contractors (London).
  • Dickens, L. (2007), The road is long: thirty years of equality legislation in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45, 3, pp. 463–494. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2007.00624.x
  • Djan Tackey, N., Barnes, H., Fearn, H. and Pillai, R. (2009), Evaluation of the Race Equality Procurement Pilots (DWP, London).
  • EHRC (2012), The Essential Guide to the Public Sector Equality Duty (Manchester).
  • EHRC (2013), Buying Better Outcomes: Mainstreaming Equality Considerations in Procurement (Manchester).
  • Eisenberg, S. (2004), Still waiting after all these years: women in the US construction industry. In Clarke, L., Pedersen, E. F., Michielsens, E., Susman, B. and Wall, C. (Eds), Women in Construction (CLR/Reed Business Information, Brussels), pp. 188–201.
  • GEO (2010), Equality Bill: Making it Work. Policy Proposals for Specific Duties (London).
  • GLA (2007), The Construction Industry in London and Diversity Performance (London).
  • HMSO (2005), Jobs for the Girls: The Effect of Occupational Segregation on the Gender Pay Gap, House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee Report of Session 2004–5 (London).
  • Lowe, J. and Woodcroft, I. (2014), Women in construction—time to think differently? In Munn, M. (Ed), Building the Future: Women in Construction (Smith Institute, London), pp. 67–76.
  • Macfarlane, R. and Anthony Collins Solicitors LLP (2014), Tackling Poverty Through Public Procurement (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York).
  • McCrudden, C. (2009), Public procurement and the Equality Bill: a modest proposal. Equal Opportunities Review, 185, pp. 8–11.
  • McCrudden, C. (2011), Procurement and the public sector equality duty: lessons for the implementation of the Equality Act 2010 from Northern Ireland. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 11, 1/2, pp. 85–98. doi: 10.1177/135822911101100209
  • McCrudden, C. (2012), Procurement and fairness in the workplace. In Dickens, L. (Ed), Making Employment Rights Effective: Issues Of Enforcement and Compliance (Hart Publishing, Oxford), pp. 87–114.
  • National Women's Law Center (2014), Women in Construction: Still Breaking Ground (Washington, D.C.).
  • NCVO (2014), Commissioning for Social Value: An Interim Report for the Children's Partnership (London).
  • Nelson, J. (2014), Women and manual trades— a personal story and how we all need to be a bit more bothered. In Munn, M. (Ed), Building the Future: Women in Construction (Smith Institute, London), pp. 29–36.
  • ODA (2007), Equality and Diversity Strategy (London).
  • Office for National Statistics (2013), Annual survey of hours and earnings, 2013 provisional results. Statistical Bulletin (London).
  • OGC (2008), Make Equality Count (London).
  • Social Enterprise UK (2014), The Future of Social Value (London).
  • Thrush, C. and Martins, L. (2011), Lessons Learned From the London 2012 Games Construction Project: Targeted Approaches to Equality and Inclusion (Olympic Delivery Authority, London).
  • Women and Work Commission (2006), Shaping a Fairer Future (London).
  • Wright, T. (2014), The Women into Construction Project: An Assessment of a Model for Increasing Women's Participation in Construction (Queen Mary University of London).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.