Risk management challenges of shared public services: a comparative analysis of Scotland and Finland

References

• Alänge, S., Jacobsson, S. and Jarnehammar, A. (1998), Some aspects of an analytical framework for studying the diffusion of organizational innovations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 1, pp. 3–21. doi: 10.1080/09537329808524301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon. (2014), Patients to be given online access to their own health records in Scotland by 2020. Daily Record (5 March).
   Google Scholar
• Arbuthnott, J. (2009), Clyde Valley Review (Clyde Valley Community Planning Partnership).
   Google Scholar
• Asenova, D., Bailey, S. J. and McCann, C. (2013), Managing the Social Risks of Public Expenditure Cuts in Scotland (Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Asenova, D., Bailey, S. J. and McCann, C. (2014a), Public sector risk managers and spending cuts: mitigating risks. Journal of Risk Research, 18, 5, pp. 552–565. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2014.910683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asenova, D., Bailey, S. J. and McCann, C. (2014b), Managing municipal austerity: mitigation of social risk. Local Government Studies, 41, 1, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2014.919268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audit Commission (2007), Seeing the Light. Innovation in Local Public Services.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. J. (2008), Extending competition and choice in English local government. Kunnallistieteellinen aikakauskirja, 36, 2, pp. 136–149.
   Google Scholar
• Bangemann, T. O. (2005), Shared Services in Finance and Accounting (Gower Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. et al. (2004), Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide (APM Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, B. (2003), Essentials of Shared Services (Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, M. and Wheatley, K. K. (2006), Organizational risk and capital investments: a longitudinal examination of performance effects and moderating contexts. Journal of Managerial Issues, XVIII, 1, pp. 62–83.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, M. (2010), Characteristics of a successful shared services centre in the Australian public sector. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4, 3, pp. 220–231.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. and Appleton, C. (2004), Joined-up services to tackle youth crime. A case study in England. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 1, pp. 34–54. doi: 10.1093/bjc/44.1.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office (2012), Open Public Services 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office (2013), Open Public Services 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. (2010), The contribution of housing support workers to joined-up services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24, 1, pp. 100–110. doi: 10.3109/13561820903012065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-A. and Bozeman, B. (2012), Organizational risk aversion: comparing the public and non-profit sectors. Public Management Review, 14, 3, pp. 377–402. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.637406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIPFA (2010), Sharing the Gain. Collaborating for Cost-Effectiveness (www.cipfa.org).
   Google Scholar
• Coriant, B. (1995), Organizational innovations: the missing link in European competitiveness. In Andreasen, L. E. et al. (Eds), Europe's Next Step: Organizational Innovation, Competition and Employment (Frank Cass).
   Google Scholar
• Drennan, L. and McConnell, A. (2007), Risk and Crisis Management in the Public Sector (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. (2010), The Future of Joined-up Public Services (Public Services Trust).
   Google Scholar
• Eckerd, A. (2014), Risk management and risk avoidance in agency decision-making, Public Administration Review, 74, 5, pp. 616–629. doi: 10.1111/puar.12240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fone, M. and Young, P. (2005), Managing Risks in Public Sector Organizations (Perpetuity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Foo, L. M., Asenova, D., Bailey, S. J. and Hood, J. (2011), Stakeholder engagement and compliance culture: an empirical study of Scottish private finance initiative projects, Public Management Review, 13, 5, pp. 707–729. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2010.532961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, N. (2005), Professionalism, Partnership and Joined-up Thinking: A Research Review of Frontline Working with Children and Families (www.rip.org.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Hannus, A., Hallberg, P. and Niemi, A. E. (2009), Kuntalaki (WSOYpro).
   Google Scholar
• Harjula, H. and Prättälä, K. (2007), Kuntalaki— tausta ja tulkinnat. 4. uudistettu painos. (Lakimiesliiton kustannus).
   Google Scholar
• Hassett, S. and Austin, M. J. (1997), Service integration: something old and something new. Administration in Social Work, 21, 3–4, pp. 9–29. doi: 10.1300/J147v21n03_02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, A., Bramley, G., Bailey, N. and Watkins, D. (2012), Serving Deprived Communities in Recession (Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• HM Government (2010), The Coalition: Our Programme for Government (www.gov.uk/government/publications).
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2004), The Risk Programme. Improving Government's Risk Handling. Final Report to the Prime Minister (www.gov.uk/government/publications).
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury and OGC (2004), Managing Risk with Delivery Partners: A Guide for Those Working Together to Deliver Better Public Services (www.gov.uk/government/publications).
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. and Miller, P. (2009), Public service risks: what's distinctive and new? In Risk in Public Services (LSE/University of Oxford).
   Google Scholar
• IFS (2012), IFS Analysis of Today's Public Finance and Figures.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos MORI and Zurich Municipal (2010), Tough Choices: Different Perspectives on Long-Term Risks Facing the Public Sector and Wider Civil Society (www.ipsos-mori.com).
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Joha, A. and Weerakkody, V. (2007), Exploring relationships of shared service arrangements in local government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1, 3, pp. 271–284.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, K. K. (2007), Organizational risk in large audit firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22, 6, pp. 590–603. doi: 10.1108/02686900710759398
   Google Scholar
• Joha, A. and Janssen, M. (2010), Public–private partnerships, outsourcing or shared service centres? Motives and intents for selecting sourcing configurations. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4, 3, pp. 232–248.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, D. and Richards, D. (2001), Departmentalism and joined-up government: back to the future? Parliamentary Affairs, 54, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1093/pa/54.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, T. (2002), Delivering joined-up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration, 80, 4, pp. 615–642. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. (2014), Edinburgh sauna raids show police ‘culture clash’. The Scotsman (30 May).
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. G., Rentell, P. G. and Geere, D. (2008), Procurement as a shared service in English local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21, 5, pp. 540–555. doi: 10.1108/09513550810885822
   Google Scholar
• NAO (2000), Supporting Innovation: Managing Risk in Government Departments (The Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• NAO (2001), Innovation in PFI Financing. The Treasury Building Project, HC 328 (The Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• NAO (2008), Risk and Management of Work in Ministry of Defense PFI Projects, HC 343 (The Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• NAO (2013a), Integration Across Government, HC 1041 (The Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• NAO (2013b), Case Study on Integration: Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Whole-Place Community Budgets, HC 1040 (The Stationery Office).
   Google Scholar
• NAO/HM Treasury (2010), Managing Complex Capital Investment Programmes Utilizing Private Finance (www.nao.org.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Niehaves, B. and Krause, A. (2010), Shared service strategies in local government—a multiple case study exploration. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4, 3, pp. 266–279. doi: 10.1108/17506161011065235
   Google Scholar
• Nissinen, T. and Viitasaari, A. (2006), Kunta-ja palvelurakenneuudistus—kuntien kadonnutta taloudellisuutta etsimässä. In Meklin, P. et al. (Eds), Kuntarakenteita etsimässä. Puheenvuoroja kunta-ja palvelurakenteiden uudistustarpeista ja- mahdollisuuksista (Tampere University Press), pp. 86–104.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. and Brown, L. (2011), Innovation in public services: engaging with risk. Public Money & Management, 31, 1, pp. 4–6. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2011.545532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxfam (2012), The Perfect Storm: Economic Stagnation, the Rising Cost of Living, Public Spending Cuts, and the Impact on UK Poverty (http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2003), Joined-up government: a survey. Political Studies Review, 1, pp. 34–49. doi: 10.1111/1478-9299.00004
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004), The Risk Management of Everything (Demos).
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2009), The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, pp. 849–855. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Priest, J. (2012), The Integration of Health and Social Care (British Medical Association).
   Google Scholar
• Ratasvuori, E. (2005), Kommunal samarbete och offentliga upphandlingar. Nordisk seminarium: De grundläggande fri-och rättigheterna i privaträtten och den offentliga rätten.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, P. (2000), HR Shared Services and the Realignment of HR ( Institute for Employment Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Sahala, H. and Tammi, T. (2003), Seudulliset sosiaalipalvelujen järjestämisen ja tuottamisen tavat. In Majoinen K. et al. (Eds), Sosiaalipalveluja seutuyhteistyöllä—ideasta sopimukseen (Suomen Kuntaliitto and Sosiaali-ja terveysministeriö).
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2014a), Public Service Reform/ Community Planning (www.scotland.gov.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2014b), Joining up health and social care: Integration bill passed by the ScottishParliament (http://news.scotland.gov.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2014c), Public bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Bill, Explanatory Notes (www.scottish.parliament.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2014d), Statement of Ambition (www.scotland.gov.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Ulbrich, F. (2010), Adopting shared services in public-sector organizations. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4, 3, pp. 249–265.
   Google Scholar
• Valkama, P. (2013), Markkinainnovaatiot yhdyskuntajätehuollossa.Tutkimusjätehuoltopalvelujen markkinoiden evoluutiosta, sovelluksista ja jännitteistä kunnallisen ja yksityisen sektorin rajapinnassa ( Tampereen yliopisto, johtamiskorkeakoulu).
   Google Scholar
• Valkama, P., Bailey, S. J. and Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2013), Analyzing organizational innovation in publicservices—conceptualandtheoreticalissues. In Valkama, P., Bailey, S. J. and Anttiroiko, A.-V. (Eds), Organizational Innovation in Public Services: Forms and Governance (Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Warin, J. (2007), Joined-up services for young children and their families. Papering over the cracks or re-constructing the foundations? Children & Society, 21, 2, pp. 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, M. (2013), Narrowed Horizons: The Fiscal Choices at Spending Review 2013 and Beyond (Resolution Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. (2011), Risk Management in Organizations: An Integrated Case Study Approach (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Young, P. (2006), Private Sector and Public Sector Risk Management: Is There a Difference? (http://www.eirm.com/en).
   Google Scholar