The board's role in risk disclosure: an exploratory study of Italian listed state-owned enterprises

References

• Abraham, S. and Cox, P. (2007), Analysing the determinants of narrative risk information in UK FTSE 100 annual reports. British Accounting Review, 39, 3, pp. 227–248.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. and Ferreira, D. (2009), Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 2, pp. 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. (1970), The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 4, pp. 629–650.
   Google Scholar
• Allegrini, M. and Greco, G. (2013), Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure:evidencefromItalianlistedcompanies. Journal of Management & Governance, 17, 1, pp. 187–216.
   Google Scholar
• Allini, A., Manes, Rossi F. and Macchioni, R. (2014), Do corporate governance characteristics affect non-financial risk disclosure in government-owned companies? The Italian experience. Financial Reporting, 1, pp. 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Argento, D., Grossi, G., Tagesson, T. and Collin, S. O. (2010), The ‘externalisation’ of local public service delivery: experience in Italy and Sweden. International Journal of Public Policy, 5, 1, pp. 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Batley, R. A. and Larbi, G. A. (2004), The Changing Role of Government: The Reform of Public Services in Developing Countries (Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Beretta, S. and Bozzolan, S. (2004), A framework for the analysis of risk communication. International Journal of Accounting, 39, 3, pp. 265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A. and Signoretti, R. (2011), Women on boards in Italy. Quaderni di Finanza, 70, pp. 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (2003), Control and legitimization in government accountability processes: the private finance initiative in the UK. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 1–2, pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Caba, Perez, C. and Lopez-Hernandez, A. M. (2009), Governmental financial transparency in MERCOSUR member countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 1, pp. 169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrò, A., Torchia, M. and Ranalli, F. (2013), Ownership and control in local public utilities: the Italian case. Journal of Management and Governance, 17, 4, pp. 835–862.
   Google Scholar
• Carlon, S., Loftus, J. and Miller, M. (2003), The challenge of risk reporting: regulatory and corporate responses. Australian Accounting Review, 13, 3, pp. 336–351.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D., N. and Rui, O. M. (2006), Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 3, pp. 424–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshandidy, T., Fraser, I. and Hussainey, K. (2013), Aggregated, voluntary, and mandatory risk disclosure incentives: evidence from UK FTSE all-share companies. International Review of financial Analysis, 30, pp. 320–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshandidy, T. and Neri, L. (2015), Corporate governance, risk disclosure practices, and market liquidity: comparative evidence from the UK and Italy. Corporate Governance. DOI: 10.1111/corg.12095.
   Google Scholar
• Ellwood, S. and Garcia-Lacalle, J. (2015), The influence of presence and position of women on the boards of directors: the case of NHS foundation trusts. Journal of Business Ethics, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2206-8.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. and Jensen, M. (1983), Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 2, pp. 301–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. J., Lam, K. C. and Lee, G. M. (2002), Voluntary disclosure by state owned enterprises listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 13, 2, pp. 125–152.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, S., Jagannathan, M. and Pritchard, A. (2003), Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. Journal of Finance, 58, 3, pp. 1087–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fich, E. and Shivdasani, A. (2006), Are busy boards effective monitors? Journal of Finance, 61, 2, pp. 689–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnan, L., Hinna, A., Monteduro, F. and Scarozza, D. (2011), SOEs ownership and control: independence and competence of boards members. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8, 1, pp. 720–739.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G. and Reichard, C. (2008), Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy. Public Administration Review, 10, 5, pp. 597–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A. and Leung, S. (2002), Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23, 5, pp. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Güner, B., Malmendier, U. and Geoffrey, T. (2008), Financialexpertiseofdirectors.JournalofFinancial Economics, 88, 2, pp. 323–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. and Farneti, F. (2008), GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations. Public Money & Management, 28, 6, pp. 361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haniffa, R. and Hudaib, M. (2006), Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33, 7, pp. 1034–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinna, A., De, Nito E. and Mangia, G. (2010), Board of directors within public organisations: a literature review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 5, 3, pp. 131–156.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, R., Wright, M. and Keasey, K. (1996), Corporate governance in the public services: concepts and issues. Public Money & Management, 16, 2, pp. 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFAC and CIPFA (2014), International Framework: Good Governance in the Public Sector (www.ifac.org).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E. (1992), Consequences of group composition for the interpersonal dynamics of strategic issue processing. In Shrivastava, P. et al. (Eds), Advances in Strategic Management (JAI Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976), Theory of the firm: management behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 3, pp. 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 3, pp. 831–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., Cheng, M. and Gray, S. J. (2007), Corporate governance and board composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance, 15, 2, pp. 194–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khlif, H. and Hussainey, K. (2014), The association between risk disclosure and firm characteristics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Risk Research, published online.
   Google Scholar
• Koufopoulos, D., Zoumbos, V. and Argyropoulou, M. (2008), Top management team and corporate performance: a study of Greek firms. Team Performance Management, 14, 7/8, pp. 340–363.
   Google Scholar
• Kravet, T. and Muslu, V. (2013), Textual risk disclosures and investors’ risk perceptions. Review of Accounting Studies, 18, 4, pp. 1088–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J. (2005), Public Administration and Public Management: the Principal–Agent Perspective (Routledge, London).
   Google Scholar
• Latif, R. A., Kamardin, H., Mohd, K. N. T. and Adam, N. C. (2013), Multiple directorships, board characteristics and firm performance in Malaysia. Management, 3, 2, pp. 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Linsley, P. and Shrives, P. (2006), Risk reporting: a study of risk disclosure in the annual reports of UK companies. British Accounting Review, 38, 4, pp. 387–404.
   Google Scholar
• Maffei, M. (2010), La disclosure sui rischi, con particolare riferimento alle banche (Giappichelli).
   Google Scholar
• Monteduro, F. (2014), Public–private versus public ownership and economic performance: evidence from Italian local utilities. Journal of Management and Governance, 18, 1, pp. 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. and Huse, M. (2010), Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: the role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7, 1, pp. 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S. and Thomas, D. A. (2013), Corporate governance and risk reporting in South Africa. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, pp. 363–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2005), Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J., Rodrigues, L. L. and Craig, R. (2011), Risk-related disclosures by non-finance companies: Portuguese practices and disclosure characteristics. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26, 9, pp. 817–839.
   Google Scholar
• Peda, P., Grossi, G. and Liik, M. (2013), Do ownership and size affect the performance of water utilities? Evidence from Estonian municipalities. Journal of Management and Governance, 17, 2, pp. 237–259.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. N. (1975), Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision-making performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 1, pp. 74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N. (1999), Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 1, pp. 113–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. Y. and O'Reilly, C. A. (1998), Demography and diversity in organizations. In Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behaviour (JAI Press).
   Google Scholar