505
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric

References

  • Cabinet Office (2012), The Approval Process for the Creation of Non Departmental Public Bodies (The Stationery Office).
  • Cabinet Office (2014a), Sponsorship Specialism Competency Framework (www.gov.uk).
  • Cabinet Office (2014b), Public Bodies 2014 Data.
  • Cabinet Office (2014c), Public Bodies 2014 Overview.
  • Cabinet Office (2014d), Review of the Administrative Classification of Public Bodies within the United Kingdom (www.gov.uk).
  • Cabinet Office (2014e), Public Bodies Reform Strategy (www.gov.uk).
  • DPER (2011), Public Service Reform Plan.
  • DPER (2014a), Public Service Reform Plan 2014– 16.
  • DPER (2014b), A Report on the Implementation of the Agency Rationalization Programme.
  • Dommett, K. (2014), Triennial Reviews and Public Body Reform in the UK (www.shrinkingthestate.org.uk).
  • Dommett, K. and Flinders, M. (2014a), The politics of quangocide. Policy and Politics, 43, 1, pp. 3–25.
  • Dommett, K. and Flinders, M. (2014b), The centre strikes back: meta-governance, delegation and the core executive in the United Kingdom, 2010–2014. Public Administration, 93, 1, pp. 1–16.
  • Dommett, K., Flinders, M., Skelcher, C. and Tonkiss, K. (2014), Did they ‘read before burning’? The coalition and quangos. The Political Quarterly, 85, 2, pp. 133–142.
  • Elston, T. (2014), Shared corporate services in the public sector: a critical review. Paper presented at the 64th annual conference of the Political Studies Association, Manchester.
  • Flinders, M., Dommett, K. and Tonkiss, K. (2014), Bonfires and barbeques: coalition governance and the politics of quango reform. Contemporary British History, 28, 1, pp. 56–80.
  • Flinders, M. and Skelcher, C. (2012), Shrinking the quango state: five challenges in reforming quangos. Public Money & Management, 32, 5, pp. 327–334.
  • Flinders, M. and Tonkiss, K. (2015), From ‘poor parenting’ to micro-management: coalition governance and the sponsorship of arm’s length bodies in the United Kingdom, 2010–2013. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 19, pp. 1–26.
  • Institute for Government (2015), Out of the Ashes: Priorities for Reforming Arm’s-length Government in the UK.
  • Interview No. 1 (November 2012), Forestry Commission (London).
  • Interview No. 2 (November 2014), Department of Justice and Law Reform (Dublin).
  • Interview No. 3 (April 2013 ), Home Office (London).
  • Interview No. 4 (April 2013), Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (London).
  • Interview No. 5 (November 2014), Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (Dublin). Interview No. 6 (November 2012), Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (London).
  • Lenihan, B. (2008), Budget speech (14 October) (www.budget.gov.ie).
  • Lodge, M. and Hood, C. (2011), Into an age of multiple austerities? Public management and public service bargains across OECD countries. Governance, 25, 1, pp. 79–101.
  • MacCarthaigh, M. (2012a), Politics, policy preferences and the evolution of Irish bureaucracy: a framework for analysis. Irish Political Studies, 27, 1, pp. 23–47.
  • MacCarthaigh, M. (2012b), From agencification to de-agencification: the changing bureaucratic model. In O’Malley, E. and MacCarthaigh, M. (Eds), Governing Ireland: From Cabinet Government to Delegated Governance (Institute of Public Administration), pp. 128–151.
  • MacCarthaigh. M. (2014a), Agency termination in Ireland: culls and bonfires, or life after death? Public Administration, 92, 4, pp. 1017–1037.
  • MacCarthaigh, M. (2014b), Shared services in Ireland. In Laegreid, P. et al. (Eds), Organizing for Coordination in the Public Sector: Practices and Lessons from 12 Countries (Palgrave), pp. 54–65.
  • Maude, F. (2014), Public bodies summit speech (10 November) (www.gov.uk).
  • OECD (2008), Ireland: Towards an Integrated Public Service (Paris).
  • Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (2011), Special Report: Public Bodies Act 2011: Two Years On (The Stationery Office).
  • Skelcher, C. (2015), Reforming the oversight of administrative justice 2010–2014: does the UK need a new Leggatt Report? Public Law, 2, pp. 215–224.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.