Contextualizing politicians’ uses of accounting information: reassurance and ammunition

References

• Ansari, S. and Euske, K. J. (1987), Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 6, pp. 549–570. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90008-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I. and Steccolini, I. (2015), Performance management in the public sector: the ultimate challenge. Financial Accountability & Management, 31, 1, pp 1–22. doi: 10.1111/faam.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askim, J. (2007), How do politicians use performance information? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73, 3, pp. 453–472. doi: 10.1177/0020852307081152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003), Why measure performance? Different purposes require different indicators. Public Administration Review, 63, 5, pp. 586–606. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogt, H. J. ter (2003), Performance evaluation styles in governmental organizations: how do professional managers facilitate politicians’ work? Management Accounting Research, 14, 4, pp. 311–332. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2003.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Bogt, H. J. ter (2004), Politicians in search of performance Information? Survey research on Dutch aldermen’s use of performance information. Financial Accountability & Management, 20, 3, pp. 221–252. doi: 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00387.x
   Google Scholar
• Bogt, H. J. ter, Helden, J. van and Kolk, B. van der (2015), Challenging the NPM ideas about performance management: selectivity and differentiation in outcome-oriented performance budgeting. Financial Accountability & Management, 31, 3, pp. 287–315. doi: 10.1111/faam.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J. and Laughlin, R. (2009), Performance management systems: a conceptual model. Management Accounting Research, 20, 4, pp. 283–295. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, S. et al. (1980), The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5, 1, pp. 5–27. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(80)90017-3
   Google Scholar
• Dooren, W. van and Walle, S. van de (Eds), (2008), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used (Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• Dooren, W. van, Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. (2010), Performance Management in the Public Sector (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M. et al. (2007), Discourse and institutional change: ‘giving accounts’ and accountability. Management Accounting Research, 18, 2, pp. 150–171. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2007.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. and March, J. G. (1981), Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 2, pp. 171–186. doi: 10.2307/2392467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. E. (2004), A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29, 4, pp. 653–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helden, J. van (2015), A critical literature review and a challenging research agenda on politicians’ use of accounting information. Paper presented at the CIGAR conference (Malta).
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1981), Management control of public and not-for-profit activities. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6, 3, pp. 193–211. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(81)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karra, N. and Phillips, N. (2008), Researching ‘back home’: international management research as autoethnography. Organizational Research Methods, 11, pp. 541–561. doi: 10.1177/1094428106295496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2014), Why performance information use varies among public managers: testing manager-related explanations. International Public Management Journal, 17, 2, pp. 174–201. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2014.905409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (1999), Accounting and the new public management: instruments of substantive efficiency or a rationalizing modernity? Financial Accountability & Management, 15, 3/4, pp. 201–207. doi: 10.1111/1468-0408.00081
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1956), The political science of science. American Political Science Review, 50, 4, pp. 961–979. doi: 10.2307/1951330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., Sicilia, M. and Steccolini, I. (2012), Some like it non-financial … politicians’ and managers’ views on the importance of performance information. Public Management Review, 14, 7, pp. 903–922. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.650054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D., Pandey, S. and Wright, B. (2012), Pro-social values and performance management theory: the link between perceived social impact and performance information use. Governance, 25, 3, pp. 463–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01583.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D.P. and Pandey, S. K. (2010), The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 4, pp. 849–866. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. and Abma, T. (2003), Management by measurement? Public management practices amidst ambiguity. Public Administration, 81, 4, pp. 853–871. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006), Performance information for democracy: the missing link? Evaluation, 12, 1, pp. 38–55. doi: 10.1177/1356389006064191
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. and Tuden, A. (1959), Strategies, structures and processes of organizational decision. In Thompson J. D. et al. (Eds), Comparative Studies in Administration (University of Pittsburgh Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. B. (1964), The Politics of the Budgetary Process (Little, Brown).
   Google Scholar