Integrated performance management using information technology: a study of UK charities

References

• Anheier, H. K. (2000), Managing non-profit organisations: towards a new approach. Civil Society Working Paper, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I. et al. (1984), A critique of the stage hypothesis: theory and empirical evidence. Communications of the ACM, 27, 5, pp. 476–485. doi: 10.1145/358189.358076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushouse, B. K. and Sowa, J. E. (2012), Producing knowledge for practice: assessing NVSQ 2000– 2010. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, pp. 497–513. doi: 10.1177/0899764011422116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeira, M. M. and Ward, J. M. (2003), Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing SMEs. European Journal of Information Systems, 12, pp. 127–141. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. and Holwell, S. (1998), Information, Systems and Information Systems (Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Clerkin, R. M. and Grønbjerg, K. A. (2007), Infrastructure and activities: relating IT to the work of nonprofit organizations. In Cortés, M. and Rafter, K. M. (Eds), op. cit., pp. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, C. and Hyndman, N. (2013), Charity accountability in the UK: through the eyes of the donor. Qualitative research in Accounting & Management, 10, 3/4, pp. 259–278. doi: 10.1108/QRAM-02-2013-0006
   Google Scholar
• Cordery, C. and Sinclair, R. (2013), Measuring performance in the third sector. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10, 3/4, pp. 196–212. doi: 10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0014
   Google Scholar
• Cortés, M. and Rafter, K. M. (Eds), (2007), Nonprofits & Technology: Emerging Research for Usable Knowledge (Lyceum), pp. ix–xxi.
   Google Scholar
• Dacombe, R. (2011), Can we argue against it? Performance management and state funding of voluntary organizations in the UK. Public Money & Management, 31, 3, pp. 159–166. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2011.573224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., DeLong, D. and Beers, M. (1998), Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review (Winter), pp. 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dresner, H. (2008), The Performance Management Revolution (Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Emrich, E. and Pierdzioch, C. (2016), The internet and the commitment of volunteers: empirical evidence for the German Red Cross. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Frolick, M. N. and Ariyachandra, T. R. (2006), Business performance management. Information Systems Management, 23, 1, pp. 41–48. doi: 10.1201/1078.10580530/45769.23.1.20061201/91771.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallegos, D., Russell-Bennett, R. and Previte, J. (2011), An innovative approach to reducing risks associated with infant feeding. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 23, pp. 237–347. doi: 10.1080/10495142.2011.623504
   Google Scholar
• Hackler, D. and Saxton, G. D. (2007), The strategic use of information technology by nonprofit organizations: increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public Administration Review, 67, 3, pp. 474–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00730.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobelsky, K., Larosiliere, G. and Plummer, E. (2014), The impact of information technology on performance in the not-for-profit sector. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 15, pp. 47–65. doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, B., Barraket, J. and Eversole, R. (2013), Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10, 3/4, pp. 234–258. doi: 10.1108/QRAM-08-2012-0034
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, P. and Pitkin, B. (2007), Barriers to information technology usage in the nonprofit sector. In Cortés, M. and Rafter, K. M. (Eds), op. cit., pp. 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, B. (2008), Strategic Performance Management in Government and Public Sector Organisations (API, CIPFA and Actuate).
   Google Scholar
• Melchert, F. and Winter, R. (2004), The enabling role of information technology for business performance management. IFIP Conference on Decision Support Systems, pp. 535–546.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. G. (2013), Purposes, activities and beneficiaries. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10, 3/4, pp. 295–315. doi: 10.1108/QRAM-04-2013-0016
   Google Scholar
• Moxham, C. (2013), Measuring up: examining the potential for voluntary sector performance measurement to improve public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 33, 3, pp. 193–200. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.785704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxham, C. (2014), Understanding third sector performance measurement system design. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63, 6, pp. 704–726. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-08-2013-0143
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Yaghi, B. and Youell, N. (2008), Enterprise Performance Management: The Global State of the Art (Oracle/Cranfield School of Management).
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A. (2009), ‘We do good things, don’t we?’; ‘blended value accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 6, pp. 755–769. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppard, J. and Ward, J. (2016), The Strategic Management of Information Systems (Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D. and Guo, C. (2011), Accountability online: understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, pp. 270–295. doi: 10.1177/0899764009341086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan, A. (2013), Is the way we view the voluntary sector counter-productive to charities? Guardian ( 11 April).
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, P. G., Mahoney, T. Q. and Hambrick, M. E. (2015), Twitter as a communication tool for nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44, pp. 1086–1106. doi: 10.1177/0899764014553639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1995), Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, pp. 74–81. doi: 10.1057/ejis.1995.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, J. and Seley, J. E. (2007), The use of computer and office technology among New York City’s nonprofit organizations. In Cortés, M. and Rafter, K. M. (Eds), op. cit., pp. 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014), Case Study Research. Design and Methods (Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Gutierrez, O. and Mathieson, K. (2010), Information systems research in the nonprofit context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zorn, T. E., Flanagin, A. J. and Shoham, M. D. (2011), Institutional and noninstitutional influences on information and communication technology adoption and use among nonprofit organizations. Human Communication Research, 37, 1, pp. 1–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar