Editorial

References

• Agostino, D. and Arnaboldi, M. (2017), Rational and ritualistic use of key performance indicators in hybrid organizations. Public Money & Management, 37, 6, pp. 409–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexius, S. and Cisneros Örnberg, J. (2015), Mission(s) impossible? Configuring values in the governance of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32, 4/5, pp. 286–306. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-08-2015-0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argento, D., Culasso, F. and Truant, E. (2016), Competing logics in the expansion of public service corporations. Utilities Policy, 40, pp. 125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (1987), All Organizations are Public (Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T. and Karré, P. M. (2011), Hybrid organizations: no cause for concern? International Journal of Public Administration, 34, pp. 827–836. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2011.605090
   Google Scholar
• Cappellaro, G. and Ricci, A. (2017), PPPs in health and social services: a performance measurement perspective. Public Money & Management, 37, 6, pp. 417–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Laegreid, P. (2011), Complexity and hybrid public administration: theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11, pp. 407–423. doi: 10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
   Google Scholar
• Da Cruz, N. F. and Cunha Marques, R. (2012), Mixed companies and local governance: no man can serve two masters. Public Administration, 90, 3, pp. 737–758. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., Ferlie, E. and Van Gestel, N. (2015), Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93, 2, pp. 273–289. doi: 10.1111/padm.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohs, S. (2014), Hybrid organizations in social service delivery in quasimarkets: the case of Germany. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 11, pp. 1425–1445. doi: 10.1177/0002764214534671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G. and Thomasson, A. (2015), Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations: the case of Copenhagen Malmö port. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81, 3, pp. 604–620. doi: 10.1177/0020852314548151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helden, J. van and Reichard, C. (2016a), Commonalities and differences in public and private sector performance management practices; a literature review. In Epstein, M. J. et al. (Eds), Performance Management and Management Control: Contemporary Issues (Emerald), pp. 309–351.
   Google Scholar
• Helden, J. van and Reichard, C. (2016b), Performance management. In Farazmand, A. (Ed), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Høgvold Olsen, T., Solstad, E. and Torsteinsen, H. (2017), The meaning of institutional logics for performance assessment in boards of municipal companies. Public Money & Management, 37, 6, pp. 393–400.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, J.-E. and Vakkuri, J. (2017), Governing Hybrid Organizations (Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kurunmäki, L. and Miller, P. (2006), Modernising government: the calculating self, hybridization and performance measurement. Financial Accountability & Management, 22, 1, pp. 87–106. doi: 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00394.x
   Google Scholar
• Mair, J., Mayer, J. and Lutz, E. (2015), Navigating institutional plurality: organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36, 6, pp. 713–739. doi: 10.1177/0170840615580007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, C. (2004), The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, pp. 345–376. doi: 10.1628/0932456041960605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A. and Hammerschmid, G. (2014), Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92, 4, pp. 861–885. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlenkamp, H. (2013), From state to market revisited: more empirical evidence on the efficiency of public (and privately-owned) enterprises (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de).
   Google Scholar
• Musacchio, A., Lazzarini, S. G. and Aguilera, R. V. (2015), New varieties of state capitalism: strategic and governance implications. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29, 1, pp. 115–131. doi: 10.5465/amp.2013.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C. and Santos, F. (2013), Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 4, pp. 972–1001. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. and Rainey, H. G. (1988), The public– private distinction in organization theory: a critique and research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13, 2, pp. 182–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudla, R. (2012), The use of performance information in budgetary decision-making by legislators. Public Administration, 90, 4, pp. 1000–1015. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibel, W. (2015), Studying hybrids: sectors and mechanisms. Organization Studies, 36, 6, pp. 697–712. doi: 10.1177/0170840615580005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. and Rathgeb Smith, S. (2015), Theorizing hybridity: institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: the case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93, 2, pp. 433–448. doi: 10.1111/padm.12105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, S. and Rathgeb Smith, S. (2017), Performance promises and pitfalls in hybrid organizations—five challenges for managers and researchers. Public Money & Management, 37, 6, pp. 425–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. (2009), Exploring the ambiguity of hybrid organisations: a stakeholder approach. Financial Accountability & Management, 25, 3, pp. 353–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00481.x
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. (2012), The Institutional Logics Perspective (Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Thynne, I. (2017), Debate: A mixed public– private telecommunications company of public significance—management challenges in staff ownership and integrity. Public Money & Management, 37, 6, pp. 389–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolstrup Christensen, T. (2017), How hybridity has evolved in the governance of state-owned enterprises: evidence from Danish and Swedish passenger rail services from 1990 to 2015. Public Money & Management, 37, 6, pp. 401–408.
   Google Scholar
• Vakkuri, J. (2010), Struggling with ambiguity: public managers as users of NPM-oriented management instruments. Public Administration, 88, 4, pp. 999–1024. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01856.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W. (2017), Debate: A bull in a china shop? How performance targets confront complexity—and survive. Public Money & Management, 37, 6, pp. 390–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R. and Weimer, D. L. (2016), The challenges of fractionalized property rights in public–private hybrid organizations: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Regulation and Governance, 10, 2, pp. 161–178. doi: 10.1111/rego.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R. and Weimer, D. L. (2017), Debate: Adam Smith was skeptical of hybrids—should we be less so? Public Money & Management, 37, 6, pp. 387–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. (1991), Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 2, pp. 269–296. doi: 10.2307/2393356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar