References
- Brunsson, N. (1989), The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Action in Organizations (Wiley).
- De Waele, L., Berghman, L. and Matthyssens, P. (2015), Defining hybridity and hybrid contingencies in public organizations: an alternative conceptual model. In Gnan, L. et al. (Eds), Contingency, Behavioural and Evolutionary Perspectives on Public and Nonprofit Governance (Emerald).
- Laegreid, P., Roness, P. G. and Rubecksen, K. (2008), Performance information and performance steering: integrated system or loose coupling? In Van Dooren, W. and Van de Walle, S. (Eds), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used (Palgrave Macmillan).
- Noordegraaf, M. and Abma, T. (2003), Management by measurement? Public management practices amidst ambiguity. Public Administration, 81, 4, pp. 853–871. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00374.x
- Porter, T. M. (1995), Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press).
- Radin, B. A. (2006), Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values (Georgetown University Press).
- Scott, J. C. (1998), Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed (Yale University Press).
- Thomasson, A. (2009), Exploring the ambiguity of hybrid organizations: a stakeholder approach. Financial Accountability & Management, 25, 3, pp. 353–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00481.x
- Vakkuri, J. (2010), Strugglingwithambiguity:public managers as users of NPM-oriented management instruments. Public Administration, 88, 4, pp. 999–1024. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01856.x
- Van de Walle, S. and Roberts, A. (2008), Publishing performance information: an illusion of control? In Van Dooren, W. and Van de Walle, S. (Eds), op. cit.
- Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., and Halligan, J. (2015), Performance Management in the Public Sector, 2nd edn (Routledge).