Women in public policy and public administration?

References

• Andrews, R., Ashworth, R., & Meier, K. J. (2014). Representative bureaucracy and fire service performance. International Journal of Public Management, 17(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Johnston Miller, K. (2013). Representative bureaucracy, gender and policing: The case of domestic violence arrests. Public Administration, 91(4), 998–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M. D., & Kellough, J. E. (2007). Representative bureaucracy: Exploring the potential for active representation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 697–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M. D., & Kellough, J. E. (2011). Representative bureaucracy: Assessing the evidence on active representation. American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, R. A., Pandey, S., & Riccucci, N. M. (2017). Intersectionality in public leadership research: A review and future research agenda. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 160–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell, L. (2002). Gendering government; feminist engagement with the state in Australia and Canada. University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. Buchanan (Ed.), The sage handbook of organizational research methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, J. (2000). The senior executive service: Gender, attitudes, and representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(3), 513–529.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, J. (2001). Women in the executive branch: A review essay of their political impact and career opportunities. Women & Politics, 22(4), 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, J. (2004). Gender equity: Illusion or reality for women in the federal executive service. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, J., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (eds.). (2003). Representative bureaucracy: Classic readings and continuing controversies. M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Duerst-Lahti, G., & Kelly, R. M. (eds.). (1995). Gender, power, leadership and governance. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markel, D. (2014). Pulled over. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young. (2013). Worldwide index of women as public sector leaders.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2018). Gender pay gap. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett Society. (2018). Sex and power. Retrieved from www.fawcettsociety.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., & Lee, H. (2016). The transformation of the South African public service: Exploring impact of racial and gender representation on organizational effectiveness. Journal of Modern African Studies, 54(1), 91–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K. E. (1985). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, R., Lewis, S., & Rapoport, R. (2006). The myth of work-life balance: The challenge of our time for men, women and societies. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E., & Newman, M. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim, C. (2004). Key issues in women’s work. Glasshouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haussman, M., Sawer, M., & Vickers, J. (eds.). (2010). Federalism, feminism and multilevel governance. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hindera, J. J. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: Further evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 415–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hindera, J. J., & Young, C. D. (1998). Representative bureaucracy: The theoretical implications of statistical interaction. Political Research Quarterly, 51(3), 655–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. (2016a). Does increasing ethnic representativeness reduce police misconduct? Public Administration Review, 77(2), 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. (2016b). Representative bureaucracy, organizational integrity, and citizen coproduction: Does an increase in police ethnic representativeness reduce crime? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(1), 11–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, K., & Houston, J. (2018). Representative bureaucracy: Does female police leadership affect gender-based violence arrests? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(1), 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston Miller, K., & McTavish, D. (2014). Representative bureaucracy: A typology of normative institutional strategies for the representation of women. Policy & Politics, 42(4), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. M., & Newman, M. (2001). The gendered bureaucracy: Agency mission, equality of opportunity, and representative bureaucracies. Women & Politics, 22(3), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, B., Miller, W., & Reid, M. (2002). Sex based occupational segregation in the US state bureaucracies 1987–97. Public Administration Review, 6(4), 412–423.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. K. (2003). Representation and policy outputs: Examining the linkage between passive and active representation. Public Personnel Management, 32(4), 549–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. S. (1995). Sex-role identity and decision styles: How gender helps explain the paucity of women at the top. In Duerst-Lahti, G. and Kelly, R. M. op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley, J. D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy. Antioch Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, M. (1999). On the gendered substructure of organizations: Dimensions and dilemmas of corporate masculinity. In G. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender & work. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. G. (2002). Theorizing feminist policy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. G., & Pollock, M. A. (2009). Gender and public policy in Europe. Comparative European Politics, 9(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• McTavish, D., & Miller, K. (eds.). (2006). Women in leadership and management. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 69(2), 526–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1993). Latinos and representative bureaucracy: Testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 393–414.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 455–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2006). Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 850–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Nigro, L. G. (1976). Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences: A study in attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review, 36(4), 458–469.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. Jr (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state. John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Stewart, J. Jr (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies. American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Stewart, J., & England, R. E. (1990). Race, class and education: The politics of second generation discrimination. University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., Wrinkle, R. D., & Polinard, J. L. (1999). Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity. Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1025–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (2018). Theoretical frontiers in representative bureaucracy: New directions for research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. (2009). Public policy dilemma—gender equality mainstreaming in UK policy formulation. Public Money & Management, 29(1), 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K., & Clark, D. (2008). ‘Knife before wife’: An exploratory study of gender and the UK medical profession. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 22(3), 238–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mosher, F. (1982). Democracy and the public service (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. A. (1995). The gendered nature of lowi’s typology; or, who would guess you could find gender here? In G. Duerst-Lahti, & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), op. cit.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson, P. (1996). Gender, power and organization. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2018). Civil service employment; By department, profession and gender. Retrieved from www.ons.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., Schröter, E., & von Maravic, P. (2015). Politics of representative bureaucracy: Power, legitimacy and performance. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, D. W. (2005). Diversity representation and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 615–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, D. W. (2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction and performance: Evidence from US federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 328–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollert, A. (2005). Gender, transformation and employment in central and eastern Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 11(2), 213–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehfuss, J. A. (1986). A representative bureaucracy? Women and minority executives in California career service. Public Administration Review, 46(5), 454–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode, D. L. (2003). The difference ‘difference’ makes: Women and leadership. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. (2002). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (1987). Black employment in municipal workforces. Public Administration Quarterly, 11(1), 76–89.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., & Saidel, J. R. (1997). The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders: A missing piece of the representative bureaucracy puzzle. Public Administration Review, 57(5), 423–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Lavena, C. F. (2014). Representative bureaucracy in policing. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(3), 537–551.
   Google Scholar
• Saltzstein, G. H. (1979). Representative bureaucracy and bureaucratic responsibility. Administration and Society, 10(4), 464–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzstein, G. H. (1983). Personnel directors and female employment representation. Social Science Quarterly, 64(4), 734–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M., & Witz, A. (1992). Gender and bureaucracy. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, S. C. (1997). The promise of representative bureaucracy. M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, S. C., Brudney, J. L., & Kellough, J. E. (1998). Bureaucracy as a representative institution. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 717–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, A. (2004). Chronic presenteeism: The multiple dimensions to men’s absence from part-time work. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(2), 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stratigaki, M. (2005). Gender mainstreaming vs positive action. European Journal of Women Studies, 12(2), 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielemann, G. S., & Stewart, J. (1996). A demand-side perspective on the importance of representative bureaucracy: AIDS, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. Public Administration Review, 56(2), 168–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2014). Gender equality in public administration.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (1989). Theorizing patriarchy. Sociology, 23(2), 213–234.
   Google Scholar
• Weldon, S. (2002). Beyond bodies: Institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1153–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, V. M. (2006). Exploring the causal story: Gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, V. M., & Keiser, L. R. (2004). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, V. M., & Williams, B. (2008). Black or blue: Racial profiling and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 654–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, L. R. (2003). Representative bureaucracy. In B. G. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration. Sage.
   Google Scholar