Performance indicators and democracy: citizens’ views on the purposes of government websites

References

• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M., & John, P. (2010). Performance measurement as a political discipline mechanism. University of Southern California Law School, Law and Economics Working Paper Series No. 112.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & ‘t Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., Klein, R., & Day, P. (1992). How organisations measure success: The use of performance indicators in government. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, E., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2012). Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City. American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 54–65. doi: 10.1177/0275074010397333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. M., et al. (2008). Performativity, management and governance. In J. Hartley (Ed.), Managing to improve public services (pp. 46–64). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, B., Lewis, J. M., et al. (2014). Accountability and citizen participation. In M. Bovens (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 258–272). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. (2001). The politics of accountability in the modern state. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Greasley, S. (2013). Trust in government, performance information and democracy. In S. Llewellyn, et al. (Ed.), Trust and confidence in government and public Services (pp. 65–79). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., van de Walle, S., & Stimac, V. (2013). Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: Results from an international survey. Public Money & Management, 33(4), 261–268. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.799803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbein, J. (2016). Left behind? Citizen responsiveness to government performance information. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 353–368. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O. (2011). Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399–418. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., & Moseley, A. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511. doi: 10.1111/padm.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M. (2014). Individual and institutional accountability: The case of research assessment. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73(4), 408–416. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. M. (2015). The politics and consequences of performance measurement. Policy and Society, 34(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005). Modernising Government: The Way Forward.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1987). The politics of performance assessment: Lessons for higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 12(1), 87–98. doi: 10.1080/03075078712331378290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1988). Bringing consumers into performance measurement: Concepts, consequences and constraints. Policy and Politics, 16(12), 77–87. doi: 10.1332/030557388782455000
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance information for democracy: The missing link? Evaluation, 12(1), 38–55. doi: 10.1177/1356389006064191
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2018). Performance management 40 years on: A review. Some key decisions and consequences. Public Money & Management, 38(3), 167–174. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1407129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society. Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. (2005). Performance management. In E. Ferlie, et al. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 491–517). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2009). Strengthening the link between performance measurement and decision making. Public Administration, 87(4), 853–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dooren, W. (2006). Performance measurement in the flemish public sector: A supply and demand approach. Leuven Faculty of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van de Walle, S., & Cornelissen, F. (2014). Performance reporting. In M. Bovens, et al., op. cit.
   Google Scholar