Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government

References

• Allers, M. A., & de Greef, J. A. (2018). Intermunicipal co-operation, public spending and service levels. Local Government Studies, 44(1), 127–150. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1380630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114. doi: 10.2307/271083
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, O. J. (2011). Balancing efficiency, effectiveness and democracy in organizing inter-municipal partnerships: conflicting aims? Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. A. (2009). Size, structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authorities. Urban Studies, 46(4), 739–759. doi: 10.1177/0042098009102127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. (2012). Structural change and public service performance: The impact of the reorganization process in English local government. Public Administration, 90(2), 297–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01956.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2013). Public service efficiency: Reframing the debate. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. (2013). Council tax collection: Using data from the value for money profiles (June).
   Google Scholar
• Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. E. (2010). Territorial choice: The politics of boundaries and borders. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., Fageda, X., & Mur, M. (2014). Does cooperation reduce service delivery costs? Evidence from residential solid waste services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 85–107. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., & Warner, M. E. (2015). Inter-municipal cooperation and costs: expectations and evidence. Public Administration, 93(1), 52–67. doi: 10.1111/padm.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blåka, S. (2017). Does co-operation affect service delivery costs? Evidence from fire services in Norway. Public Administration, 95(4), 1092–1106. doi: 10.1111/padm.12356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 201–218. doi: 10.2307/2093199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briskman, S. (2015). Shared services—don’t be in the 60% which fail to deliver. Professional Outsourcing Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2005). Transaction costs and contracting: The practitioner perspective. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(3), 326–351.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: the example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721. doi: 10.1177/0170840600214003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2012). Next generation shared services: The strategic plan.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2015). The functional model: A model for more efficient and effective government.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, K. (2006). Elements of effective governance: Measurement, accountability and participation. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B. (2004). Perspectives on city-county consolidation and its alternatives. In J. B. Carr & R. C. Feiock (Eds.), City-county Consolidation and its alternatives: Reshaping the local government landscape. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., & Thurmaier, K. (2008). Interlocal agreements as collaborations. American Review of Public Administration, 39(5), 536–552. doi: 10.1177/0275074008324566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, M. (2002). The cost of local government structural reorganisation in Great Britain during the 1990s. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 20(2), 251–262. doi: 10.1068/c0063
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L. (1978). System influence on organizational decision making: The case of resource allocation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 6–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2012). 50 Ways to save: Examples of sensible savings in local government.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2016a). Council taxbase statistics.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG. (2016b). Local authority revenue expenditure and financing.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., & Crase, L. (2004). Is bigger local government better? An evaluation of the case for Australian municipal amalgamation programs. Urban Policy and Research, 22(3), 265–275. doi: 10.1080/0811114042000269290
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., Grant, B., & Kortt, M. (2012). Councils in cooperation: Shared services and australian local government. Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., & Carrera, L. (2013). Growing the productivity of government services. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Elston, T. (2017). Principles meet practicalities: Challenges of accountability reform in the British civil service. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Routledge handbook to accountability and welfare state reforms in Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elston, T., & Dixon, R. (2017). The effect of shared service centres on administrative intensity in English local government: A longitudinal evaluation (Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper, BSG-WP-2017/021).
   Google Scholar
• Elston, T., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2016). Sharing services, saving money? Five risks to cost saving when organizations share services. Public Money & Management, 36(5), 349–356. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1194081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elston, T., MacCarthaigh, M., & Verhoest, K. (2018). Collaborative cost-cutting: Productive efficiency as an interdependency between public organizations. Public Management Review. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1438498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, A., & Lupton, R. (2015). The limits to resilience? The impact of local government spending cuts in London. Local Government Studies, 41(4), 582–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, P. (2004). Releasing resources to the front line: Independent review of public sector efficiency.
   Google Scholar
• Gospel, H., & Sako, M. (2010). The unbundling of corporate functions: the evolution of shared services and outsourcing in human resource management. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(5), 1367–1396. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Besemer, K., & Bramley, G. (2015). Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory. Local Government Studies, 41(4), 601–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinings, C. R., & Bryman, A. (1974). Size and the administrative component in churches. Human Relations, 27(5), 457–475. doi: 10.1177/001872677402700504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2009). Operational efficiency programme: Back office operations and IT.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central government. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lago-Peñas, S., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2013). The challenge of local government size: Theoretical perspectives, international experience and policy reform. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• LGA. (2011). Shared services and management: A guide for councils.
   Google Scholar
• LGA. (2016). Shared services map.
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 371(1987), 1–17. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
   Google Scholar
• NAO. (2016). Shared service centres. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Niaounakis, T., & Blank, J. (2017). Inter-municipal cooperation, economies of scale and cost efficiency: An application of stochastic frontier analysis to Dutch municipal tax departments. Local Government Studies, 43(4), 533–554. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1322958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakerson, R. (1992). Size, function, and structure: Jurisdictional size effects on public sector performance. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Rural Studies Committee.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Building on basics: Value for money in government.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. doi: 10.1017/S0003055400125973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paagman, A., Tate, M., Furtmueller, E., & de Bloom, J. (2015). An integrative literature review and empirical validation of motives for introducing shared services in government organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2004). Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaboratives. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 591–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, R., & Tavares, A. F. (2018). Intermunicipal cooperation and austerity policies: Obstacles or opportunities? In F. Teles & P. Swianiewicz (Eds.), Inter-municipal co-operation in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, P. (2000). HR shared services and the realignment of HR. Institute of Employment Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, W. (1990). The economics of industrial organization. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M. K., & Feiock, R. C. (2011). Transaction cost, exchange embeddedness, and interlocal co-operation in local public goods supply. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 573–387. doi: 10.1177/1065912910370683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thode, H. J. (2002). Testing for normality. Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, T., Jones, G., & Burnham, J. (1993). The impact of population size on local authority costs and effectiveness. Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P. T., Berger, P. D., Miller, J. G., & Rosenthal, S. R. (1992). Manufacturing process technology and support staff composition. Production and Operations Management, 1(1), 5–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1992.tb00336.x
   Google Scholar
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., Prior, D., Díaz, A. M. P., & López-Hernández, A. M. (2013). Reducing costs in times of crisis: Delivery forms in small and medium sized local governments’ waste management services. Public Administration, 91(1), 51–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar