Measuring supreme audit institutions’ outcomes: current literature and future insights

References

• Alwardat, Y. A., Benamraoui, A., & Rieple, A. (2015). Value for money and audit practice in the UK public sector. International Journal of Auditing, 19, 206–217. doi: 10.1111/ijau.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. (2012). Performance auditing-addressing real or perceived expectation gaps in the public sector. Public Money & Management, 32(2), 129–136. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2012.656019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. (2007). Accrual accounting and budgeting systems issues in Australian governments. Australian Accounting Review, 17(1), 38–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2007.tb00452.x
   Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M. (1997). Central audit institutions and performance auditing: a comparative analysis of organizational strategies in the OECD. Governance, 10(3), 235–260. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.411997041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawole, J.N. and Ibrahim, M. (2015). Contesting claims on measuring performance in the public sector using performance audits: evidence from the literature. Public Organization Review. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-015-0312-4.
   Google Scholar
• Blume, L., & Voigt, S. (2011). Does organizational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 215–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourn, J. (2007). Public Sector Auditing: Is It Value for Money. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M., Raby, H., & Humphrey, C. (2000). In search of the audit society: some evidence from health care, police and school. International Journal of Auditing, 4, 71–100. doi: 10.1111/1099-1123.00304
   Google Scholar
• Bringselius, L. (2014). The dissemination of results from supreme audit institutions: independent partners with the media? Financial Accountability & Management, 30(1), 75–94. doi: 10.1111/faam.12028
   Google Scholar
• Brodtrick, O. (2004). How does an auditor general’s office see itself? Canadian Public Administration-Administration publique du Canada, 47(2), 225–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2004.tb01185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubnik, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: in search of the mechanism. Public Performance & Management, 28(3), 376–417.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. (1994). Supreme auditing institutions: a politico-economic analysis. European Journal of Law and Economics, 1, 169–176. doi: 10.1007/BF01552468
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, A., & Lutrin, C. (2005). State audit in the United States, 1996-2000. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 17(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-17-01-2005-B001
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., Cooper, D. J., & Townley, B. (2001). In the name of accountability: state auditing, independence and new public management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 278–310. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005518
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., Cooper, D. J., & Townley, B. (2007). The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 101–129. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, A. (2010). Contemporary public sector accounting research-an international comparison of journal papers. The British Accounting Review, 42(2), 75–87. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012). Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 68–92. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Peter, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267–282. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muh019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justesen, L., & Skærbæk, P. (2010). Performance auditing and the narrating of a new auditee identity. Financial Accountability & Management, 26(3), 325–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2010.00504.x
   Google Scholar
• Kayrak, M. (2008). Evolving challenges for supreme audit institutions in struggling with corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 15(1), 60–70. doi: 10.1108/13590790810841707
   Google Scholar
• Kells, S. (2011). The seven deadly sins of performance auditing: implications for monitoring public audit institutions. Australian Accounting Review, 21(4), 383–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2011.00150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., & Pong, C. K. M. (2000). Modernization versus problematization: value–for–money audit in public services. European Accounting Review, 9(4), 541–567. doi: 10.1080/713764876
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw, F. L. (1996). Performance auditing, new public management and performance improvement: questions and answers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), 92–102. doi: 10.1108/09513579610116385
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw, F. L. (2011). On the effects, lack of effects and perverse effects of performance audit. In J. Lonsdale, P. Wilkins, & T. Ling (Eds.), Performance Auditing. Contributing to Accountability in Democratic Government (pp. 231–247). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lonsdale, J. (2000). Developments in value–for–money audit methods: impacts and implications. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 73–89. doi: 10.1177/0020852300661007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, M., & Vada, H. (1997). Performance audit scope and the independence of the Australian commonwealth auditor-general. Financial Accountability & Management, 13(3), 203–223. doi: 10.1111/1468-0408.00034
   Google Scholar
• Milgrom, T., & Schwartz, R. (2008). Israel's auditor as policy change agent: the case of water policy. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(8), 862–877. doi: 10.1080/01900690701696178
   Google Scholar
• Morin, D. (2001). Influence of value for money audit on public administrations: looking beyond appearances. Financial Accountability & Management, 17(2), 99–117. doi: 10.1111/1468-0408.00123
   Google Scholar
• Morin, D. (2004). Measuring the impact of value–for–money audits: a model for surveying audited managers. Canadian Public Administration-Administration publique du Canada, 47(2), 141–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2004.tb01181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, D. (2008). Auditors general’s universe revisited. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(7), 697–720. doi: 10.1108/02686900810890652
   Google Scholar
• Morin, D. (2014). Auditors general’s impact on administrations: a pan-Canadian study (2001–2011). Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(5), 395–426. doi: 10.1108/MAJ-10-2013-0948
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2001). Auditors-general: cuckoos in the managerialist nest? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 60(2), 24–34. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.00206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Summa, H. (1997). Reflexive watchdogs? How supreme audit institutions account for themselves. Public Administration, 75, 313–336. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Girre, X., Lonsdale, J., Mul, R., Summa, H., & Waemess, M. (1999). Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, R., Taro, K., Agu, C. and Douglas, J.W. (2015). The impact of performance audit on public sector organizations: the case of Estonia. Public Organization Review. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-015-0308-0.
   Google Scholar
• Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. (2013). Political accountability and performance audit: the case of the auditor general in Norway. Public Administration, 91(3), 680–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. (2014a). Auditee strategies: an investigation of auditees' reactions to the Norwegian state audit institution’s performance audits. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 685–694. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2014.907309
   Google Scholar
• Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. (2014b). Performance audit and the importance of the public debate. Evaluation, 20(3), 368–385. doi: 10.1177/1356389014539869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. and Johnsen, A. (2015). Performance audits and the supreme audit institutions' impact on public administration: the case of the office of the auditor general in Norway. Administration & Society. DOI: 10.1177/0095399715623315.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S., & Pollitt, C. (1994). Audit or evaluation? A national audit office VFM study. Public Administration, 72, 527–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1994.tb00807.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. (2000). State audit-panacea for the crisis of accountability? An empirical study of the Israeli case. International Journal of Public Administration, 23(4), 405–433. doi: 10.1080/01900690008525469
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, P. (2015). Reconciling audit and evaluation? The shift to performance and effectiveness at the European court of auditors. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(1), 79–89. doi: 10.1017/S1867299X0000430X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, C., & Wiggan, J. (2010). The public value of the national audit office. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(1), 54–70. doi: 10.1108/09513551011012321
   Google Scholar
• Triantafillou, P. (2015). Doing things with numbers: the Danish national audit office and the governing of university teaching. Policy and Society, 34, 13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, F. B. (1999). Evaluation and the social construction of impacts. Evaluation, 58(4), 387–406. doi: 10.1177/135638999400830048
   Google Scholar
• Wheat, E. M. (1991). The activist auditor: a new player in state and local politics. Public Administration Review, 51(5), 385–392. doi: 10.2307/976407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, P. (1995). Performance auditors? Assessing and reporting the performance of national audit offices-a three-country comparison. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 54(4), 421–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1995.tb01154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccolotto, R., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2014). Budgetary transparency and democracy: the effectiveness of control institutions. International Business Research, 7(6), 83–96. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v7n6p83
   Google Scholar