Walking the contractual tightrope: a transaction cost economics perspective on social impact bonds

References

• Anders, J., & Dorsett, R. (2017). HMP Peterborough Social Impact Bond—cohort 2 and final cohort impact evaluation. National Institute of Economic and Social Research (http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk)
   Google Scholar
• Azemati, H., Belinsky, M., Gillette, R., Liebman, J., Sellman, A., & Wyse, A. (2013). Social Impact Bonds: Lessons Learned So Far. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (https://www.frbsf.org)
   Google Scholar
• Barthélemy, J. (2001). The Hidden Costs of IT Outsourcing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges Fund Management. (2017). Better Outcomes, Better Value. (http://www.bridgesfundmanagement.com)
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2006). Managing Public Service Contracts: Aligning Values, Institutions, and Markets. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 323–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00590.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. (2019) More than Marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform. (<https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2019.1575736>).
   Google Scholar
• Carter, E., FitzGerald, C., Dixon, R., Economy, C., Hameed, T., & Airoldi, M. (2018). Building the tools for public services to secure better outcomes: Collaboration, Prevention, Innovation. Government Outcomes Lab, University of Oxford, Blavatnik School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, E., & Whitworth, A. (2015). Creaming and Parking in Quasi-Marketised Welfare-to-Work Schemes: Designed Out Of or Designed In to the UK Work Programme? Journal of Social Policy, 44(2), 277–296. doi: 10.1017/S0047279414000841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (2014). Fair Chance Fund Full bid specification documentation (<https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk>)
   Google Scholar
• DWP (2012). The Innovation Fund Specification and Supporting Information (https://data.gov.uk/)
   Google Scholar
• Disley, E., Rubin, J., Scraggs, E., Burrowes, N., & Culley, D. M. (2011). Lessons learned from the planning and early implementation of the Social Impact Bond at HMP Peterborough. RAND Europe (https://www.rand.org)
   Google Scholar
• Disley, E., Giacomantonio, C., Kruithof, K., & Sim, M. (2015). The payment by results Social Impact Bond pilot at HMP Peterborough: final process evaluation report. Ministry of Justice Analytical Series (https://www.gov.uk)
   Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. (2002). Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector: An Interpretative Review. The Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 696–727. doi: 10.2307/3069614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A., & Picard, P. (2002). On the Role of Good Faith in Insurance Contracting (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 303841). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. (https://papers.ssrn.com)
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M., & Mays, N. (2016). Narratives of Promise, Narratives of Caution: A Review of the Literature on Social Impact Bonds. Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin, S. R., Baan, C. A., & Struijs, J. N. (2011). Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 272. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudkin, G., & Valila, T. (2006). Transaction Costs in Public–private Partnerships: A First Look at the Evidence. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 1(2), 307–330. doi: 10.1177/178359170600100209
   Google Scholar
• Girth, A. M. (2014). What Drives the Partnership Decision? Examining Structural Factors Influencing Public–private Partnerships for Municipal Wireless Broadband. International Public Management Journal, 17(3), 344–364. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2014.935240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhart, C. (1975). Problems of monetary management: The UK experience. In A. Courakis (Ed.), Inflation, Depression and Economic Policy in the West. London: Marshall.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R., Thomas, A., & Pemberton, A. (2016). Qualitative evaluation of the DWP Innovation Fund: Final report (Government Social Research No. 922) (https://www.gov.uk)
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, B., Jay Lambe, C., & Sandvik, K. (2017). Firm boundaries and transaction costs: The complementary role of capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 78, 193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson-Wright, E., Gardiner, S., & Putcha, V. (2015). The Potential and Limitations of Impact Bonds. Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J., & Choi, Y. (2007). Performance-Based Contracting in Social Welfare Programs. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(4), 409–435. doi: 10.1177/0275074006297553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaques, E. (2017). Requisite Organization: A Total System for Effective Managerial Organization and Managerial Leadership for the 21^st Century. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, N., Mulheirn, I., & Shorthouse, R. (2013). Risky Business: Social Impact Bonds and public services (http://www.smf.co.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. W., Roberts, A., & Brown, T. (2016). Impact of Product Characteristics and Market Conditions on Contract Type: Use of fixed-price versus cost-reimbursement contracts in the U.S. Department of Defense. Public Performance and Management Review, 39(4), 783–813. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1137765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. (2015). The Financialization of Urban Policy in the Age of Obama. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(1), 75–78. doi: 10.1111/juaf.12167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsdale, C., Sanderson, J., Watson, G., & Peng, F. (2016). Beyond intentional trust: supplier opportunism and management control mechanisms in public sector procurement and contracting. Policy and Politics, 44(2), 289–311. doi: 10.1332/030557314X13904934896655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, G., & Street, A. (2007). A transaction costs analysis of changing contractual relations in the English NHS. Health Policy, 83(1), 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, K. (2013). Evaluating Social Impact Bonds as a New Reentry Financing Mechanism: A Case Study on Reentry Programming in Maryland. Department of Legislative Services Office of Policy Analysis (http://mgaleg.maryland.gov)
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, N., Sinclair, S., Roy, M., Huckfield, L., & Donaldson, C. (2013). Social impact bonds: A wolf in sheep’s clothing? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21(3), 247–57. doi: 10.1332/204674313X13812372137921
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., Reeder, N., Aylott, M., & Bo’sher, L. (2011). Social Impact Investment: the challenge and opportunity of Social Impact Bonds. The Young Foundation (https://youngfoundation.org)
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2014). Outcome-based payment schemes governments’ use of payment-by-results. National Audit Office Report Series. HC 86 (https://www.nao.org.uk)
   Google Scholar
• Neyland, D. (2017). On the transformation of children at-risk into an investment proposition: A study of Social Impact Bonds as an anti-market device. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 492–510. doi: 10.1177/0038026117744415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorderhaven, N. G. (1996). Opportunism and Trust in Transaction Cost Economics. In Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond (pp. 105–128). Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S., Cordes, J. J., Pandey, S. K., & Winfrey, W. F. (2018). Use of Social Impact Bonds to Adress Social Problems: Understanding Contractual Risks and Transaction Costs. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28(4), 511–528. doi: 10.1002/nml.21307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56(1), 29–48. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(84)90005-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30–54. doi: 10.1177/002224299706100403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. (2013). Public sector finances are tight. Social Impact Bonds promise to encourage innovation in public services without the risk of paying for failure. Civil Service Quarterly (https://quarterly.blog.gov.uk)
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M., Tavares, A. F., & Araujo, J. F. (2012). Municipal service delivery: The role of transaction costs in the choice between alternative governance mechanisms. Local Government Studies, 38(5), 615–638. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2012.666211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., & Johnston, J. M. (2005). State Social Services Contracting: Exploring the Determinants of Effective Contract Accountability. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 436–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronicle, J., Fox, T., & Stanworth, N. (2016). Reconnections Social Impact Bond: reducing loneliness in Worcestershire. Big Lottery Fund. (https://www.bigsocietycapital.com)
   Google Scholar
• Ronicle, J., Stanworth, N., Hickman, E., & Fox, T. (2014). Social Impact Bonds: The State of Play. Big Lottery Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Salis, S., Wishart, R., & McKay, S. (2018). Evaluation of the Innovation Fund pilot: Quantitative assessment of impact and social return on investment (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk).
   Google Scholar
• Shelanski, H. A., & Klein, P. G. (1995). Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11, 335–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: social and rational; mathematical essays on rational human behavior in society setting. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. doi: 10.1017/S1062798700002660
   Google Scholar
• Van Herck, P., de Smedt, D., Annemans, L., Remmen, R., Rosenthal, M., & Sermeus, W. (2010). Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 247. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanneste, B. S., Puranam, P., & Kretschmer, T. (2014). Trust over time in exchange relationships: Meta-analysis and theory. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1891–1902. doi: 10.1002/smj.2198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, J. J., & North, D. C. (1986). Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970. In Long-term Factors in American Economic Growth (pp. 95–161). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N. (2003). Measuring Transaction Costs: An Incomplete Survey. Ronald Coase Institute Working Paper Series (http://www.coase.org)
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N. (2007). Measuring transaction costs: diverging approaches, contending practices. Division of Labour and Transaction Costs, 2(2), 111–146. doi: 10.1142/S0219871107000324
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (2013). Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4), 303–319. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2013.835727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Intstitutions of Capitalism. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269–296. doi: 10.2307/2393356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, J., Yuan, H., & Shi, B. (2016). Investigating partners’ opportunistic behavior in joint ventures in China: The role of transaction costs and relational exchanges. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 6067–6078. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar