From rules to collaborative practice: When regulatory mechanisms drive collective co-production

References

• Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service delivery to co-production. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2014). The multiple facets of co-production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299–316. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.806578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avritzer, L. (2009). Participatory institutions in democratic Brazil. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., & Coelho, V. S. P. (2009). Social participation in health in Brazil and England: Inclusion, representation, and authority. Health Expect, 12(3), 226–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00563.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1119–1138. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2013). The role of co-production for better health and wellbeing: Why we need to change. In E. Loeffler, D. Taylor-Gooby, T. Bovaird, & L. Wilkes (Eds.), Co-production of Health and Wellbeing in Scotland (pp. 20–27). Governance International: Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1006–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E., & Parrado, S. (2015). Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0047279414000567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government ‘red tape.’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273–303.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2004). Introduction: New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalized participation. IDS Bulletin, 35(2), 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2004.tb00115.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A., & Shankland, A. (2013). Cultures of politics, spaces of power: Contextualizing Brazilian experiences of participation. Journal of Political Power, 6(2), 309–333. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2013.811859
   Google Scholar
• Eijk, C. J. A. V., & Steen, T. P. S. (2014). Why people co-produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions of co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. doi: 10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, J. C., & Martinez, M. G. (2015). Participatory health councils and good governance: Healthy democracy in Brazil? Journal for Equity in Health, 14(21), 2–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2016). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1006–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1305–1335. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.57317866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maybin, J. C. (2014). Knowledge and knowing in policy work: A case study of civil servants in England’s department of health. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(3), 286–304. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2014.919738
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776. doi: 10.1111/puar.12765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Together for better public services: Partnering with citizens and civil society (p. 120).
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24, S31–S47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–87. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., van Ryzin, G. G., Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2013.796260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some crucial conceptual issues. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Jones, C. (2016). Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 441–54. doi: 10.1177/1476127015589981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schabram, K., & Maitlis, S. (2017). Negotiating the challenges of a calling: Emotion and enacted sensemaking in animal shelter work. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 584–609. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.0665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities. (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., Kim, J., & Leach, W. D. (2017). Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance. Public Administration Review, 77, 863–874. doi: 10.1111/puar.12800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional iogics. In R. Greenwood et al. (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. and Bovaird, T. (2007). Making better use of information to drive improvement in local public services ( A report for the audit commission) Birmingham: School of Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. N., Kang, S., & Johnson, J. (2015). (Co)-contamination as the dark side of co-production: Public value failures in co-production processes. Public Management Review, 18(5), 692–717. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar