Management control packages: a literature review and guidelines for public sector research

References

• Abernethy, M. A., & Chua, W. F. (1996). A field study of control system ‘redesign’: The impact of institutional processes on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), 569–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00515.x
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N., & Young, D. (1994). Management control in nonprofit organizations. Boston: Irwin, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12–30. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. S., & Sandelin, M. (2015). Investigating management control configurations using qualitative comparative analysis: An overview and guidelines for application. Journal of Management Control, 26(1), 5–26. doi: 10.1007/s00187-015-0204-3
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. S., Malmi, T., & Sandelin, M. (2016). Management control effectiveness and strategy: An empirical analysis of packages and systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, 12–28. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, W. J., & Waterhouse, J. H. (1975). Budgetary control and organisational structure. Journal of Accounting Research, 13(2), 177–203. doi: 10.2307/2490360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127–68. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., Ditillo, A., Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2010). Do environmental and task characteristics matter in the control of externalized local public services? Unveiling the relevance of party characteristics and citizens’ offstage voice. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(3), 350–72. doi: 10.1108/09513571011034334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Baerdemaeker, J., & Bruggeman, W. (2015). The impact of participation in strategic planning on managers’ creation of budgetary slack: The mediating role of autonomous motivation and affective organisational commitment. Management Accounting Research, 29, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. G. (1998). Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: Past results and future directions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10, 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Friis, I., Hansen, A., & Vamosi, T. (2015). On the effectiveness of incentive pay: Exploring complementarities and substitution between management control system elements in a manufacturing firm. European Accounting Review, 24(2), 241–76. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2014.976055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabner, I., & Moers, F. (2013). Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6–7), 407–419. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2013.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. (1977). The contingency theory of management accounting. The Accounting Review, 52(1), 22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinicke, A., Guenther, T. W., & Widener, S. K. (2016). An examination of the relationship between the extent of a flexible culture and the levers of control system: The key role of beliefs control. Management Accounting Research, 33, 25–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. G. (1983). On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2–3), 287–305. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(83)90035-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horngren, C. T. (1972). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., & Miller, P. (2012). Rethinking impact and redefining responsibility: The parameters and coordinates of accounting and public management reforms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25(2), 295–327. doi: 10.1108/09513571211198773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., Meyer, R. E., Polzer, T., Rota, S., & Seiwald, J. (2014). The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4/5), 388–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, F. A., & Widener, S. K. (2008). A control framework: Insights from evidence on lean accounting. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 301–323. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandwalla, P. N. (1972). The effect of different types of competition on the use of management controls. Journal of Accounting Research, 10(2), 275–285. doi: 10.2307/2490009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., Koppenjan, J., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: A theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73(3), 437–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00837.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruis, A. M., Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2016). The levers of control framework: An exploratory analysis of balance. Management Accounting Research, 32, 27–44. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, M., & Jang, H. S. (2011). Motivations behind using performance measurement: City-wide vs. selective users. Local Government Studies, 37(6), 601–620. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.615833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2003). Mapping management accounting: Graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 169–249. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00026-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintosh, N. B., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Management control systems and departmental interdependencies: An empirical study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(1), 49–61. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90015-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, K. A. (1982). The control function of management. Sloan Management Review, 23(4), 43–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merchant, K. A., & van der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management Control Systems. Edinburgh Gate, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Moers, F. (2007). Doing archival research in management accounting. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of Management accounting research (pp. 399–413). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2014). Realizing the potential of interdisciplinarity in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(8), 1227–1232. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2014-1756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W., & Akroyd, C. (2016). The MCS package in a non-budgeting organisation: A case study of mainfreight. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Mananagement, 13(1), 2–40. doi: 10.1108/QRAM-09-2014-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–23. doi: 10.5465/amr.1990.4308154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–28. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-9
   Google Scholar
• Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2013). Performance information use by politicians and public managers for internal control and external accountability purposes. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7–8), 502–517. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelin, M. (2008). Operation of management control practices as a package—a case study on control system variety in a growth firm context. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 324–343. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2008.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1995). Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speklé, R. F. & Widener S. K. (2018). Challenging issues in survey research: Discussion and suggestions. Journal of Management Accounting Research, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H. J., van Helden, G. J., & van der Kolk, B. (2016). New development: Public sector controllership—reinventing the financial specialist as a countervailing power. Public Money & Management, 36(5), 379–384. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1194086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H. J., van Helden, G. J., & van der Kolk, B. (2015). Challenging the NPM ideas about performance management—selectivity and differentiation in outcome-oriented performance budgeting. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(3), 287–315. doi: 10.1111/faam.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. (2009). Exploring the ambiguity of hybrid organisations: A stakeholder approach. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(3), 353–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00481.x
   Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, B. (2016). Management control packages in public sector organizations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, B., van Veen-Dirks P. M. G. & ter Bogt H.J. (2019). The impact of management control on employee motivation and performance in the public Sector. European Accounting Review, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, B., & Schokker, T. (2016). Hierarchical couplings in a management control package: An explorative case study. Journal of Management Control, 27(2), 129–154. doi: 10.1007/s00187-015-0226-x
   Google Scholar
• Verbeeten, F. H. M., & Speklé, R. F. (2015). Management control, results-oriented culture and public sector performance: Empirical evidence on new public management. Organization Studies, 36(7), 953–78. doi: 10.1177/0170840615580014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research. London: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar