Accountability for performance in English and Scottish fire and rescue services from 2010 to 2016

References

• Annissette, M., Cooper, C., & Neu, D. (2013). Public sector governance and accountability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 479–487. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucoin and Heintzman. (2000). The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform. In G. Peters & D. J. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in the Twenty-first Century: Revitalising the public service. CA: Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Scotland. (2015). Scottish fire and rescue service. Edinburgh: Audit Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Scotland. (2018). Scottish fire and rescue service: An update. Edinburgh: Audit Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. DC, Washington: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2015). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2005). The concept of public accountability. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jnr & A. C. Pollitt (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Schillermans, T., & Hart, P. T. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86(1), 225–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M., Ball, A., & Francis, G. (2001). Benchmarking as a Tool for the modernisation of local government. Financial Accountability & Management, 17(4), 321–329. doi: 10.1111/1468-0408.00136
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (1998, July-September). Public services under new labour: Back to bureaucracy? Public Money & Management, 18(3), 43–50. doi: 10.1111/1467-9302.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracci, E., Humphrey, C., Moll, J., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Public sector accounting and austerity: More than balancing the books? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 28(6), 878–908. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. (2000). Labour’s modernization of local government. Public Administration, 78(3), 593–612. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2010). The coalition: Our programme for government. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2011). Open public services white paper. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J., Fernandes, M., Lambert, V., & Lapsley, I. (2006). Measuring fire service performance: A comparative study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(2), 165–179. doi: 10.1108/09513550610650428
   Google Scholar
• Carter, N. (1989). Performance indicators: ‘backseat driving’ or ‘hands off’ control? Policy & Politics, 17(2), 131–138. doi: 10.1332/030557389782454857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2015). Performance and accountability – A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 15, 207–225. doi: 10.1007/s11115-013-0267-2
   Google Scholar
• Christie Commission. (2011). Report of the commission on the future delivery of public services. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government. (2012). National framework for fire and rescue authorities in England. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• De Savage, A. G. (2010). Localism and accountability report. In Fire futures. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Downe, J., Martin, S., & Doering, H. (2017). Peer challenge: A sector-led approach to performance improvement. In P. Murphy & K. Greenhalgh (Eds.), The management of fire and rescue services in the UK: An international perspective (pp. 61–75). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnik, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance – In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376–417.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, P., Ferry, L., & Zamzulaila, Z. (2014). A panotopical or synotopical approach to monitoring performance? Local public services in England and the widening accountability gap. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25, 529–538. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood, S. (2014, March). Debate: Autonomy, governance, accountability and a new audit regime. Public Money & Management, 139–141. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2014.887547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood, S., & Garcia-Lacalle, J. (2015). The Removal of a specialist oversight body for local public audit. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(2), 219–242. doi: 10.1111/faam.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L., & Baxter, J. (2010). The changing nature of contracting and trust in public-private partnerships: The case of victorian PPP prisons. ABACUS, 46(3), 289–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2010.00320.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewen, S. (2010). Fighting fires: Creating the british fire service, 1800-1978. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., Eckersley, P., & Zakaria, Z. (2015). Accountability and transparency in English local government: Moving from ‘matching parts’ to ‘awkward couple’? Financial Accountability & Management, 31(3), 345–361. doi: 10.1111/faam.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2015, May). Budgeting and governing for deficit reduction in the UK public sector: Act three ‘accountability and audit arrangements. Public Money & Management, 35(3), 201–210. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2015.1027496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubnic, S., & Woods, M. (2009). Hierarchical control and performance regimes in local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(5), 445–455. doi: 10.1108/09513550910972527
   Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2002). Who gets what, when, and how: Performance measures for accountability? For improved performance. International Review of Public Administration, 7(1), 85–95. doi: 10.1080/12294659.2002.10804995
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2018). Fire and rescue national framework for England. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2011). Localism act. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/20/contents/enacted
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2014). Local audit and accountability act. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/2/contents/enacted
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (2011). Communities and local government: Localism. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006). Alignment: Using the balanced scorecard to create corporate synergies. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kloot, L. (2009). Performance measurement and accountability in an Australian fire service. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22(2), 128–145. doi: 10.1108/09513550910934538
   Google Scholar
• Launder, D., & Perry, C. (2014). A study identifying factors influencing decision-making in dynamic emergencies like urban fire and rescue settings. International Journal of Emergency Services, 3(2), 144–161. doi: 10.1108/IJES-06-2013-0016
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2008). Preparing performance information in the public sector: An australian perspective. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(2), 117–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00449.x
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Association. (2014). Evaluation of sector-led improvement. London: LGA.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the big society. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21–40. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2011.642949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, R. (2013). Managing scotland’s public services. Edinburgh: Sweet and Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S., Nutley, S., Downe, J., & Grace, C. (2016). Analysing performance assessment in public services: How useful is the concept of a performance regime? Public Administration, 94(1), 129–145. doi: 10.1111/padm.12206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 918–938. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. W., & Gupta, V. (1994). The performance paradox. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 309–69.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., Fernadez, S., Kim, S., LeRoux, K. M., Piotrowski, S., Wright, B. E., & Yang, K. (2011). Performance regimes amidst governance complexity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i141–i155. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli, P., & Neely, A. (2010). Performance measurement in the public sector in England: Searching for the golden thread. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 591–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02180.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 8(3), 555–573. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00218
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P., & Ferry, L. (2017). Another Turn of the Screw: Fire and Rescue under the Coalition Government of 2010-2015. In P. Murphy, & K. Greenhalgh (Eds.), The Management of fire and rescue services in the UK: An international perspective (pp. 45–59). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P., & Greenhalgh, K. (2013). Performance Management in fire and rescue services. Public Money & Management, 33(3), 225–232. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.785711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P., & Greenhalgh, K. (2018). The gathering storm: Modernisation, local alignment and collaboration. Fire and rescue services under the early new labour administrations from 1997 to 2005. In P. Murphy & K. Greenhalgh (Eds.), The management of fire and rescue services in the UK: An international perspective (pp. 9–44). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2015). Department for communities and local government; financial stability of fire and rescue services. HC 491 London: NAO.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2003). Our fire and rescue service white paper London stationary office.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, M. (2015). Austerity bites: A journey to the sharp end of cuts in the UK. Bristol Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peckham, S., Exworthy, M., Greener, I., & Powell, M. (2005, August). Decentralizing health services: More local accountability or just more central control? Public Money & Management, 25(4), 221–228. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2005.10600097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pileman, S., Andersson, D., & Mojr, K. (2014). Enabling organizational learning from rescue operations – the Swedish rescue services incident reporting system. International Journal of Emergency Services, 3(2), 101–117. doi: 10.1108/IJES-06-2014-0008
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., & Scapens, R. (1985). Accounting systems and systems of accountability – understanding accounting practices in their organizational contexts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(4), 443–456. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(85)90005-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schui, F. (2014). Austerity. The great failure. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2011). A consultation on the future of the fire and rescue service in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Fire and Rescue Advisory Unit. (2010). Review of the implementation and impact of integrated risk management planning in scottish fire and rescue services. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2016). Fire and rescue framework for Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS). (2014). Planning and performance management framework. Edinburgh: SFRS.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2013). Fire and rescue framework for Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2013a). Scottish fire and rescue service (SFRS) governance and accountability framework. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. (1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 20(2-3), 219–237. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0003-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, S. (2012). Contesting public accountability: A dialogical exploration of accountability and social housing. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23, 230–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2011.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2004). New localism, progressive politics and democracy. USA: The Political Quarterly Publishing Company, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. (2003). New forms of local accountability: Coming to terms with ‘many hands’? Policy and Politics, 31(3), 353–369. doi: 10.1332/030557303322034992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., Murphy, P., & Greenhalgh, K. (2017). Reform of scottish fire and rescue services from 2010-2015. In P. Murphy & K. Greenhalgh (Eds.), Fire and rescue services: Leadership and management perspectives (pp. 191–205). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2008). Case study research—design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar