1,617
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Participatory budgeting, community engagement and impact on public services in Scotland

, , &

References

  • Adman, P. (2011). Investigating political equality: The example of gender and political participation in Sweden. Acta Politica, 46, 380–399. doi: 10.1057/ap.2011.2
  • Barbera, C., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). What Mr. Rossi wants in participatory budgeting: Two R’s (Responsiveness and Representation) and Two I’s (Inclusiveness and Interaction). International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1088–1100.
  • Celis, K., & Mügge, L. M. (2018). Whose equality? Measuring group representation. Politics, 38(2), 197–213. doi: 10.1177/0263395716684527
  • Conley, H., & Wright, T. (2015). Making reflexive legislation work: Stakeholder engagement and public procurement in the public sector equality duty. Equality and Diversity Forum and EDF Research Network.
  • COSLA and Scottish Government. (2017). Community choices 1% framework agreement. Retrieved from http://www.cosla.gov.uk/community-choices-1-framework-agreement. Last accessed 11/01/2019.
  • Christie Commission. (2011). Commission on the future delivery of public services. Scottish Government.
  • Dahl, R. A. (2006). On political equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Escobar, O., Garven, F., Harkins, C., Glazik, K., Cameron, S., & Stoddart, A. (2018). Participatory budgeting in Scotland: The interplay of public service reform, community empowerment and social justice. In Hope for democracy: 30 years of participatory budgeting worldwide. Oficina. Retrieved from http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk/publications/hope-for-democracy-participatory-budgeting-in-scotland/
  • Ganuza, E., & Baiocchi, G. (2012). The power of ambiguity: How participatory budgeting travels the globe. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), 1–12. 6.
  • Glasgow City Council. (2018). Participatory budgeting (PB), wellbeing, empowerment, community, and citizen engagement city policy committee. Item 7, 31 May 2018. Retrieved from http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CouncillorsandCommittees/viewSelectedDocument.asp?c=P62AFQDN2UZLT1Z381. Last accessed 10/01/2019.
  • Gomez, J., Insua, D.R., & Alfaro, C. (2016). A participatory budget model under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(1), 351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.024
  • Gonçalves, S. (2014). The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Development, 53, 94–110. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.009
  • Glasgow Disability Alliance. (2017). Budgeting for equality action research by disabled people exploring: How can disabled people play a full and meaningful role in participatory budgeting in Scotland? Retrieved from http://gda.scot//content/publications/Final-GDA-BudgetingforEquality.pdf. Last accessed 11/01/2019.
  • Gordon, V., Osgood, J. L., & Boden, D. (2017). The role of citizen participation and the use of social media platforms in the participatory budgeting process. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 65–76. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2015.1072215
  • Hadjimichalis, C., & Hudson, R. (2007). Rethinking local and regional development: Implications for radical political practice in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 99–113. doi: 10.1177/0969776407076290
  • Harkins, C., & Egan, J. (2012). The role of participatory budgeting in promoting localism and mobilising community assets. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health.
  • Harkins, C., & Escobar, O. (2015). Participatory budgeting in Scotland: An overview of strategic design choices and principles for effective delivery. Glasgow Centre for Population Health and What Works Scotland.
  • Hepple, B. (2014). Equality: The legal framework. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Im, T., Lee, H., Cho, W., & Campbell, J. (2014). Citizen preference and resource allocation: The case for participatory budgeting in Seoul. Local Government Studies, 40(1), 102–120. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.812963
  • Kim, S., & Schachter, L. (2013). Citizen participation in the budget process and local government accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 456–471. doi: 10.2753/PMR1530-9576360304
  • Lavan, K. (2008). Participatory budgeting in the UK: An evaluation from a practitioner perspective. The Participatory Budgeting Unit.
  • Lightbody, R. (2017). ‘Hard to reach’ or ‘easy to ignore'? Promoting equality in community engagement. Edinburgh: What Works Scotland.
  • Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: Part 2–citizens’ perspectives. Public Administration, 79(2), 445–455. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00264
  • McKay, A., & Gillespie, M. (2007). Gender mainstreaming or ‘mainstreaming gender’? A question of delivering on gender equality in the New Scotland. In M. Keating (Ed.), Scottish social democracy progressive ideas for public policy. Brussels: Peter Lang.
  • Michels, A. (2012). Citizen participation in local policy-making: Design and democracy. Internation Journal of Public Adminstration, 35, 285–292. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2012.661301
  • Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy-making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477–491. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
  • Moir, E., & Leyshon, M. (2013). The design of decision-making: Participatory budgeting and the production of localizm. Local Environment, 18(9), 1002–1023. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.752798
  • Montambeault, F. (2016). Participatory citizenship in the making? The multiple citizenship trajectories of participatory budgeting participants in Brazil. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 282–298. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2016.1213508
  • O’Hagan, A. (2016). Redefining welfare in Scotland–with or without women? Critical Social Policy, 36(4), 649–671. doi: 10.1177/0261018316643794
  • O’Hagan, A., Hill O’Connor, C., MacRae, C., & Teedon, P. (2019). Evaluation of participatory budgeting activity in Scotland 2016-2018. Scottish Government. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/evaluation-participatory-budgeting-activity-scotland-2016-2018-2/
  • O’Hagan, A., Hill O’Connor, C., MacRae, C., Broadhurst, J., & Teedon, P. (2017). Evaluating participatory budgeting activity in scotland—interim report year 2. Scottish Government.
  • Parvin, P. (2018). Democracy without participation; A new politics for a disengaged. Era Res Publica, 24(3), 1–52.
  • Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711004877
  • Peixoto, T. (2012). Participatory budgeting: Seve defining characteristics. Avialable at Democracy Spot, Retrieved from https://democracyspot.net/2012/09/12/participatory-budgeting-seven-defining-characteristics/. Last accessed 3 July 2018.
  • Rumbul, R., Parsons, A., & Bramley, J. (2018). Participatory budgeting a meta-level review. My Society.
  • Sáchez Miret, C., & Bon I Geli, J. (2014). Participation as of the gender perspective from the analysis of specific participatory processes. In E. Mbera, & G. Allegretti (Eds.), Hope for democracy: 25 years of participatory budgeting worldwide (pp. 431–441).
  • Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x
  • Swaner, R. (2017). Trust matters: Enhancing government legitimacy through participatory budgeting. New Political Science, 39(1), 95–108. doi: 10.1080/07393148.2017.1278856
  • Thompson, N. K. (2012). Participatory budgeting-the Australian way. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), 5.
  • Touchton, M., & Wampler, B. (2014). Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 47(10), 1442–1469. doi: 10.1177/0010414013512601
  • Weber, R., Crum, T., & Salinas, E. (2015). The civics of community development: Participatory budgeting in Chicago. Community Development, 46(3), 261–278. doi: 10.1080/15575330.2015.1028081
  • Zhu, X., & Zhang, P. (2016). Intrinsic motivation and expert behavior: Roles of individual experts in Wenling participatory budgeting reform in China. Administration & Society, 48(7), 851–882. doi: 10.1177/0095399713519092

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.