Public management reform in the post-NPM era: lessons from Malaysia’s National Blue Ocean Strategy (NBOS)

References

• Ali Hamsa, Dato Sri, Dr (2013, May 20). National blue ocean strategy - low cost, high impact rapidly executed initiatives. New Straits Times, p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2012). Escaping capability traps through problem-driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). Centre for Global Development. Working Paper 299.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M. (2007). Instruction to deliver. London, UK: Methuen Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, M. (2016). How to run a government so that citizens benefit and taxpayers don't go crazy. London, UK: Penguin/Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance-international comparisons. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buntin, J. (2016). 25 years later, what happened to ‘reinventing government'? Governing the States and Localities. Retrieved from http://www.governing.com/topics/mgmt/gov-reinventing-government-book.html (Accessed on 12 October 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common, R. (2003). ‘Malaysia: A case of business as usual’? In A. B. L. Cheung, & I. Scott (Eds.), Governance and public sector reform in Asia (pp. 163–185). London: RoutledgeCurzon.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2011). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Armonk, New York: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Tinkler, J., & Bastow, S. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Planning Unit (EPU). (2015). Eleventh Malaysia plan, 2016-2020. Putrajaya: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• EPU. (2018). National transformation programme 2017 report. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Flumian, M., Coe, A., & Kernaghan, K. (2007). Transforming service to Canadians: The service Canada model. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(4), 557–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. (2008). The centrelink experiment- innovation in service delivery. Canberra, ACT: Australian National University E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kehoe, S. (ud). Service NSW - Blue Ocean strategy case study. Australia: NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Kettle, D. (2000). Global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. W., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. W., & Mauborgne, R. (2017). Blue ocean shift. London, UK: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kisner, M., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2017). The provenance of public management and its future: Is public management here to stay? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6-7), 532–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, W. (2012). Can top-down and bottom-up be reconciled? Electoral competition and service delivery in Malaysia. World Development, 40(1), 2329–2341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, W., & Lee, M. F. (2007). Malaysia as a model: Policy transferability in an Asian country. Public Management Review, 9(2), 211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, J. (2014). Emerging international standards for measurement and evaluation of public relations: A critical analysis. Public Relations Inquiry, 3(1), 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• National Economic Advisory Council (NEAC). (2010). National economic model for Malaysia. Putrajaya: Prime Ministers Department.
   Google Scholar
• National Strategy Unit (NSU). (2010). Briefing on the national blue ocean strategy. Putrajaya: Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• O'Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary, R., & Vij, N. (2012). ‘Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, M. (2004). The politics of administrative in east & southeast Asia: From gridlock to continuous improvement? Governance, 17(3), 361–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2015). Pursuing horizontal management: The politics of public sector co-ordination. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform (Third Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Public Service Department (PSD). (2018, January 8). Circular letter on the establishment of the value-innovation Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadass, S., Sambasivan, M., & Xavier, J. A. (2018). Collaboration outcomes in a public sector: impact of governance, leadership, interdependence and relational capital. Journal of Management and Governance. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-018-9401-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarji, A. (1996). Civil service reforms- towards Malaysia’s vision 2020. Petaling Jaya: Pelunduk Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Savoie, D. J. (2008). What is wrong with the new public management? Canadian Public Administration, 38(1), 112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (2002). Agencies in search of principles. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2(1), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Shafie, H. (1996). Malaysia’s experience in implementing the new performance appraisal system. Public Administration & Development, 16, 341–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiquee, N. A. (2010). Managing for results: Lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(1), 38–53.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiquee, N. A., Xavier, J. A., & Zin, M. (2017). What works and why? Lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1390762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taib, M., & Mat, J. (1992). Administrative reform in Malaysia towards enhancing public service performance. Governance, 5(4), 423–437.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2011). World bank approach to public sector management, 2011-2020. Washington DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier, J. A. (1996). Budget reform - The Malaysian experience. Public Administration and Development, 16(5), 485–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier, J. A. (2014). A diagnostic approach to performance management: The case of the performance management and delivery unit of Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 970–979.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier, J. A., Siddiquee, N. A., & Zin, M. (2016). The government transformation program of Malaysia: A successful approach to public service reform. Public Money and Management, 36(2), 81–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, M. (2012). Driving innovation through strategic collaboration: The malaysian experience. In Better service delivery through open government and innovative policies. OECD Korea Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar