905
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

The reconciliation of budgeting with financial reporting: A comparative study of Italy and the UK

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Anessi Pessina, E., & Steccolini, I. (2007). Effects of budgetary and accruals accounting coexistence: Evidence from Italian local governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(2), 113–131.
  • Biondi, Y. (2016). The HM ‘Treasure's Island’: The application of accruals-based accounting standards in the UK government. Accounting in Europe, 13(1), 81–102.
  • Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S., & Manes-Rossi, F. (Eds.). (2015). Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe. In The challenge of harmonization. Palgrave.
  • Brusca, I., Manes-Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2017). Performance measurement in Italian and Spanish local governments: Comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(5), 470–486.
  • Bucellato, A. (2001). La Funzione del Programma Elettorale per il Governo delle Aziende Pubbliche. In Annali della Facoltà di Economia di Cagliari. Franco Angeli.
  • Caruana, J. (2016). Shades of governmental financial reporting with a national accounting twist. Accounting Forum, 40, 153–165.
  • Caruana, J., Dabbicco, G., Jorge, S., & Jesus, M. A. (2019). The development of EPSAS: Contributions from the literature. Accounting in Europe, 16(2), 146–176.
  • Caruana, J., & Zammit, K. (2019). Losing control: The gap in multi-level government reporting. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(2), 264–284.
  • Cascino, S., Clatworthy, M., García Osma, B., Gassen, J., Imam, S., & Jeanjean, T. (2014). Who uses financial reports and for what purpose? Evidence from capital providers. Accounting in Europe, 11(2), 185–209.
  • Cohen, S., Kaimenakis, N., & Venieris, G. (2013). Reaping the benefits of two worlds: An explanatory study of the cash and the accrual accounting information roles in local governments. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 14(2), 165–179.
  • Corbetta, P. (2003). Social research: Theory, methods and techniques. SAGE.
  • Dabbicco, G. (2013). The reconciliation of primary accounting data for government entities and the balances according to statistical measures: The case of the European excessive deficit procedure. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(1), 31–43.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
  • EC (Eurostat). (2019). Visualisations, mobile apps & extraction tools, Country profile. Retrieved on https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/help/first-visit/tools country profiles, and https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/guip/themeAction.do on 3 June 2019.
  • Ellwood, S. M., & Rixon, D. (2011). Social accounting and public management. Routledge.
  • Fox, A., Hannah, G., Helliar, C., & Veneziani, M. (2013). The costs and benefits of IFRS implementation in the UK and Italy. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 14(1), 86–101.
  • Giovannelli, L., & Caffu, S. (2018). Contabilità aziendale versus contabilità statistica. Criticità e punti di attenzione per migliorare l’affidabilità della rendicontazione europea. In F. Manes-Rossi, & E. Caperchione (Eds.), L’armonizzazione contabile nelle pubbliche amministrazioni in una prospettiva internazionale. Franco Angeli.
  • Heald, D., & Georgiou, G. (2009). Whole of government accounts developments in the UK: Conceptual, technical and timetable issues. Public Money & Management, 29(4), 219–227.
  • Heiling, J., & Chan, J. (2012). From servant to master? Jahrbuch der Schweizerischen Verwaltungswissenschaften, 3, 23–38.
  • Hirst, P. (2000). Democracy and governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy (pp. 13–35). Oxford University Press.
  • HM Treasury. (2009). Clear line of sight – the alignment project, TSO. hm-treasury.gov.uk.
  • HM Treasury. (2013). Guidance, how to understand public sector spending. annually-managed-expenditure-AME Published 29 May 2013 retrieved at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/how-to-understand-public-sector-spending/how-to-understand-public-sector-spending#annually-managed-expenditure-ame.
  • HM Treasury. (2017). Corporate report, main supply estimates 2017 to 2018. Published 19 April 2017 retrieved at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/main-supply-estimates-2017-to-2018.
  • HM Treasury. (2018). Guidance, ministry of defence annual report and accounts 2017 to 2018, MOD annual report and accounts for the year ending 31 March 2018. Published 20 July 2018 retrieved at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ministry-of-defence-annual-report-and-accounts-2017-to-2018.
  • Hood, C. (1995). The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.
  • Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., Meyer, R. E., Polzer, T., Rota, S., & Seiwald, J. (2014). The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4-5), 388–408.
  • Jones, R. (2003). The diffusion of accrual accounting and budgeting in European governments – A cross-countries analysis. In K. Lüder, & R. Jones (Eds.), Reforming governmental accounting and budgeting in Europe. Fachverlag Moderne Wirtschaft.
  • Jones, R. (2012). Budgetary accounting in national governments: Anglo versus american accounting. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(3), 286–305.
  • Jones, R. (2014). Management of government within two different exogeneous financial metrics: An unfamiliar context for research and teaching. In A. Bourmistrov, & O. Olson (Eds.), Accounting, management control and institutional development. Cappalen Damm Akademisk.
  • Jones, R., & Caruana, J. (2015). Public sector accounting and auditing in the United Kingdom. In Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe. Palgrave.
  • Jones, R., Lande, E., Lüder, K., & Portal, M. (2013). A comparison of budgeting and accounting reforms in the national governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(4), 419–441.
  • Jones, R., & Lüder, K. (2011). The federal government of Germany's circumspection concerning accrual budgeting and accounting. Public Money & Management, 31(4), 265–270.
  • Lapsley, I. (1999). Accounting and the new public management: Instruments of substantive efficiency or a rationalizing modernity? Financial Accountability and Management, 15(3-4), 201–202.
  • Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381.
  • Liguori, M., Sicilia, M. F., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Some Like it Non-Financial … Politicians’ and managers’ views on the importance of performance information. Public Management Review, 14(7), 903–922.
  • Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 349–361.
  • Lüder, K. (1992). Contingency model of government accounting innovations in the political administrative environment. Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 7, 99–127.
  • Mack, J., & Ryan, C. (2006). Reflections on the theoretical underpinnings of the general-purpose financial reports of Australian government departments. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(4), 592–612.
  • Manes-Rossi, F. (2015). Public sector accounting and auditing in Italy. In I. Brusca, E. Caperchione, S. Cohen, & F. Manes-Rossi Rossi (Eds.), Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe. The challenge of harmonization. IIAS Series, Governance and Public Management (Palgrave).
  • Mattei, G. (2018). I proventi pubblici nel sistema contabile economico-patrimoniale. Il caso degli enti territoriali italiani. Azienda Pubblica, 31(1), 81–100.
  • Mayston, D. (1992). Capital accounting, user needs and the foundations of a conceptual framework for public sector financial reporting. Financial Accountability & Management, 8(4), 227–248.
  • Mussari, R., Tranfaglia, A. E., Reichard, C., Bjørnå, H., Nakrošis, V., & Bankauskaitė-Grigaliūnienė, S. (2016). Design, trajectories of reform, and implementation of performance budgeting in local governments: A comparative study of Germany, Italy, Lithuania, and Norway. In Local public sector reforms in times of crisis (pp. 101–119). Palgrave.
  • OECD/IFAC. (2017). Accrual practices and reform experiences in OECD Countries. OECD Publishing.
  • Ouda, H. A. (2004). Basic requirements model for successful implementation of accrual accounting in the public sector. Public Fund Digest, 4(1), 78–99.
  • Oulasvirta, L. (2014). Governmental financial accounting and European harmonization: Case study of Finland. Accounting, Economics and Law, 4(3), 237–263.
  • Pina, V., & Torres, L. (2003). Reshaping public sector accounting: An international comparative view. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 20(4), 334–350.
  • Portal, M., Jones, R., Lande, E., & Lüder, K. (2012). French revolution and German circumspection: Reforming budgeting and accounting in national governments. Public Money and Management, 32(5), 357–61.
  • PwC. (2014). Collection of information related to the potential impact, including costs, of implementing accrual accounting in the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS Standards (www.pwc.be). Ec.europe.eu.
  • Reichard, C., & van Helden, G. J. (2016). Why cash-based budgeting still prevails in an era of accrual-based reporting in the public sector. Accounting, Finance & Governance Review, 23(1-2), 43–65.
  • Scapens, R. W. (2004). Doing case study research. In The real life guide to accounting research: A behind-the-scenes view of using qualitative research methods. Elsevier Science.
  • Tanjeh, M. S. (2016). Factors influencing the acceptance of international public sector accounting standards in Cameroon. Accounting and Finance Research, 5(2), 71–83.
  • Van der Hoek, M. P. (2005). From cash to accrual budgeting and accounting in the public sector: The Dutch experience. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(1), 32–45.
  • Woods, M. (2009). A contingency theory perspective on risk management control system within Birmingham city council. Management Accounting Research, 20(1), 69–81.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.