Understanding the police response to fraud: the challenges in configuring a response to a low-priority crime on the rise

References

• Age UK. (2015). Only the tip of the iceberg: Fraud against older people evidence review. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, M. (2017). Investigation of fraud and economic crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blakeborough, L., & Correia, S. (2018). The scale and nature of fraud: A review of the evidence. London: Home Office. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/720772/scale-and-nature-of-fraud-review-of-evidence.pdf [Accessed 29 September 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Bossler, A. M., Burruss, G. W., & Holt, T. J. (2016). Assessing police perceptions of cybercrime and the law enforcement response in England and Wales. USA: Georgia Southern University. Available at: https://www.cambridgecyber crime.uk/slides-2016-bossler.pdf [Accessed 2 August 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G., & Button, M. (2011). The police and fraud investigation and the case for a nationalized solution in the United Kingdom. The Police Journal, 84. doi: 10.1350/pojo.2011.84.4.559
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., Blackbourn, D., & Shepherd, D. (2016). The fraud ‘Justice Systems': A scoping study on the civil, regulatory and private paths to ‘Justice’ for fraudsters. Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., Blackbourn, D., & Tunley, M. (2014a). ‘The not so thin blue line after all?’ Investigative resources dedicated to fighting fraud/economic crime in the United Kingdom. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 9(2), 129–142. doi: 10.1093/police/pau037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, M., & Cross, C. (2017). Cyber frauds, scams and their victims. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., Lewis, C., Shepherd, D., Brooks, G., & Wakefield, A. (2012). Fraud and punishment: enhancing deterrence through more effective sanctions. Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2009). A better deal for fraud victims: Research into victims’ needs and experiences. London: NFA.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2014b). Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security Journal, 27(1), 36–54. doi: 10.1057/sj.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, M., & Tunley, M. (2015). Explaining fraud deviancy attenuation in the United Kingdom. Crime, Law and Social Change, 63(1), 49–64. doi: 10.1007/s10611-015-9551-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of London Corporation. (2015). The implications of economic cybercrime for policing: research report. London: City of London Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, R., Webb, S., Garner, S., Skidmore, M., Gill, M., & Graham, J. (2017). The impact of organized crime in local communities. London: The Police Foundation/Perpetuity Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, C. (2015). No laughing matter: Blaming the victim of online fraud. International Review of Victimology, 21(1), 187–204. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/83702/ doi: 10.1177/0269758015571471
   Google Scholar
• Cross, C. (2016). ‘They’re Very Lonely’: understanding the fraud victimisation of seniors. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(4), 60–75. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i4.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig, A., & Levi, M. (2013). A case of arrested development? Delivering the UK national fraud strategy within competing policing policy priorities. Public Money and Management, 33(2), 145–152. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2013.763435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraud Advisory Panel. (2012). Obtaining redress and improving outcomes for the victims of fraud: Research into the experiences of smaller business fraud victims in recovering their money (case studies). London: Fraud Advisory Panel. Available at:.
   Google Scholar
• Gannon, R., & Doig, A. (2010). Ducking the answer? Fraud strategies and police resources. Policing & Society, 20(1), 39–60. doi: 10.1080/10439460903377329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hales, G., & Higgins, A. (2016). Prioritisation in a changing world: seven challenges for policing. London: The Police Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2006). Fraud Review: Final Report. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070222120000 / http://www.lslo.gov.uk/pdf/FraudReview.pdf [Accessed 5 August 2018]
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2018). Serious and organized crime strategy. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HMIC. (2015). Real lives, real crimes: A study of digital crime and policing. London: HMIC.
   Google Scholar
• HMICFRS. (2019). Time to choose: An inspection of the police response to fraud. London: HMICFRS.
   Google Scholar
• Home Affairs Committee. (2018) Policing for the future: Tenth report of session 2017–19. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmhaff/515/515.pdf [Accessed 24 June 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2004). Home Office circular 47 / 2004: Priorities for the investigation of fraud cases. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130125153037 / http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/corporate-publications-strategy/home-office-circulars/circulars-2004/?d-7095067-p=3 [Accessed 2 September 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2015). The strategic policing requirement. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2018). Home Office counting rules for recorded crime: Fraud. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/counting-rules-for-recorded-crime [Accessed 3 October 2018]
   Google Scholar
• Innes, H., & Innes, M. (2013). Personal, situational and incidental vulnerabilities to ASB harm: a follow up study. Cardiff: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• King, J., & Doig, A. (2016). A dedicated place for volume fraud within the current UK economic crime agenda? The greater manchester police case study. The Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 902–915. doi: 10.1108/JFC-07-2015-0036
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (2013). Regulating fraud (Routledge Revivals): White-collar crime and the criminal process. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Burrows, J. (2008). Measuring the impact of fraud in the UK: A conceptual and empirical journey. The British Journal of Criminology, 48(3), 293–318. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azn001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Maguire, M. (2012). Something old, something new; something not entirely blue: Uneven and shifting modes of crime control. In T. Newburn, & J. Peay (Eds.),  Policing: Politics, Culture and Control. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M., Doig, A., Gundur, R., Wall, D., & Williams, M. (2015). The implications of economic cybercrime for policing. London: City of London Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M., Doig, A., Gundur, R., Wall, D., & Williams, M. (2017). Cyberfraud and the implications for effective risk-based responses: themes from UK research. Crime Law and Social Change, 67(1), 77–96. doi: 10.1007/s10611-016-9648-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveday, B. (2017). Still Plodding Along? The police response to the changing profile of crime in England and Wales. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 19(2), 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, H., Skodbo, S., & Blyth, P. (2013). Understanding organized crime: estimating the scale and the social and economic costs. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2015). Code of practice for victims of crime. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-code-of-practice-for-victims-of-crime [Accessed 15 January 2018]
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2017). Online fraud. London: National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2018a). Crime in England and Wales: year ending March 2018. London: ONS.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2018b). Overview of fraud and computer misuse statistics for England and Wales. London: ONS.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Fair Trading. (2009). The psychology of scams: Provoking and committing errors of judgement. London: OFT.
   Google Scholar
• Police Executive Research Forum. (2014). The role of local law enforcement agencies in preventing and investigating cyber crime. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, D. (2018). https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/computer-says-no-to-police-action-in-cyberfraud-cases-below-100k-znsvwcp3s.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes, A. (2018). The scale and drivers of attrition in reported fraud and cyber crime: Research Report 97. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, M., Ramm, J., Goldstraw-White, J., Barrett, C., Barleaza, S., Muir, R., & Gill, M. (2018). More than just a number: Improving the police response to victims of fraud. London: The Police Foundation/Perpetuity Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, D. (2007/10). Policing cybercrimes: Situating the Public police in networks of security within cyberspace. Police Practice & Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 183–205. doi: 10.1080/15614260701377729
   Google Scholar