Forensic accounting services in English local government and the counter-fraud agenda

References

• Alonso, J. M., Clifton, J., & Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2013). Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review, 17(5), 643–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolou, N., & Crumbley, D. L. (2005). The expanding role of the forensic accountant. The Forensic Examiner, 3(9), 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M. (2011). Fraud investigation and the “flawed architecture” of counter fraud entities in the united kingdom. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 39(4), 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, B.-L. (Ed.). (2017). Forensic accounting and finance: Principles and practice. Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• CIPFA. (2016). Fighting fraud & corruption locally: The local government counter fraud and corruption strategy, 2016-2019 (CIPFA). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/503657/Fighting_fraud_and_corruption_locally_strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIPFA. (2018). CIPFA fraud and corruption tracker survey summary report 2018 (CIPFA). Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/sbuscjc/Downloads/CIPFA%20Fraud%20and%20Corruption%20Tracker%20Summary%20Report%202018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. (2008). Control shift: Returning power to local communities. Policy Green paper No. 9 (The Conservative Party).
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, H. M., & Jenkins, D. E. (2002). Public sector financial management. Third Edition Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Doig, A. (2018). Fraud: From national strategies to practice on the ground—A regional case study. Public Money & Management, 38(2), 147–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2015). Budgeting and governing for deficit reduction in the UK public sector: act three ‘accountability and audit arrangements’. Public Money &Management, 35(3), 203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, R., & Doig, A. (2010). Ducking the answer? Fraud strategies and police resources. Policing and Society, 20(1), 39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegazy, S., Sangster, A., & Kotb, A. (2017). Mapping forensic accounting in the UK. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 28, 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2016). Not what it said on the tin? Reflections on three decades of UK public management reform. Financial Accountability & Management, 32(4), 409–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee. (2011). Audit and inspection of local authorities. 4th Report. HC 763 (House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee).
   Google Scholar
• Huber, D., & DiGabriele, J. A. (2014). Research in forensic accounting—what matters? Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 40–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kipping, M., & Saint-Martin, D. (2005). Between regulation, promotion and consumption: Government and management consultancy in Britain. Business History, 47(3), 449–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, A., & Macaulay, M. (2013). Localism in practice: investigating citizen participation and good governance in local government standards of conduct. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (2017). Assessing the trends, scale and nature of economic cybercrimes: Overview and issues. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(1), 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Burrows, J. (2008). Measuring the impact of fraud in the UK: A conceptual and empirical journey. British Journal of Criminology, 48(3), 293–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., Doig, A., Gundur, R., Wall, D., & Williams, M. (2017). Cyberfraud and the implications for effective risk-based responses: Themes from UK research. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(1), 77–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LGA. (2015). Managing the risk of procurement fraud. Local Government Association.
   Google Scholar
• May, T., & Bhardwa, B. (2018). Organised crime groups involved in fraud. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, F. H., & Martin, S. (2017). The forensic accountant in practice. In B.-L. Chew (Ed.), Forensic accounting and finance: Principles and practice (pp. 1–17). Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2019a). Local auditor reporting in England 2018. HC 1864. National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2019b). Local authority governance. HC 1865. National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Fraud Authority. (2011). The local government fraud strategy. National Fraud Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Public Audit Forum. (2001). Propriety and audit in the public sector. National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Samociuk, M., Iyer, I., & Doody, H. (Eds.). (2010) A short guide to fraud risk: Fraud resistance and detection. Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Sandford, M. (2016). Local audit in England. Briefing paper 06046. House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Sandford, M. (2019). Local audit in England. Briefing paper 07240. House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P., & Stoker, G. (2011). The coalition programme: A new vision for Britain or politics as usual? The Political Quarterly, 82(1), 4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmins, N., & Gash, T. (2014). Dying to improve. The demise of the audit commission and other improvement agencies. Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, K., & Skelcher, C. (2015). Abolishing the audit commission: Framing, discourse coalitions and administrative reform. Local Government Studies, 41(6), 861–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Akkeren, J., & Buckby, S. (2017). Perceptions on the causes of individual and fraudulent co-offending: Views of forensic accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2), 383–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar