Public–private partnerships in Social Impact Bonds: facilitating competition or hindering transparency?

References

• Albertson, K., Fox, C., O’Leary, C., Painter, G., & Bailey, K. (2018). Payment by results and Social Impact Bonds: Outcome-based payment systems in the UK and US. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlquist, J. S., & Breunig, C. (2009). Country clustering in comparative political economy: Bd. 09/5.
   Google Scholar
• Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 399–418. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baliga, S. (2013). Shaping the success of social impact bonds in the United States: Lessons learned from the privatiziation of U.S. prisons. Duke Law Journal, 63, 437–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, J. (2012). This is what modern deregulation looks like: Co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK's open government data initiative. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R., Wutich, A., & Ryan, G. W. (2017). Analysing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Birchall, C. (2015). ‘Data.gov-in-a-box’: Delimiting transparency. European Journal of Social Theory, 18, 185–202. doi: 10.1177/1368431014555259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burand, D. (2013). Globalizing social finance: How social impact bonds and social impact performance guarantees can scale development. NYU Journal of Law & Business, 9, 447–502.
   Google Scholar
• Conradie, P., & Choenni, S. (2014). On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S10–S17. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2014). The impact of functional decentralization and externalization on local government transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davilmar, C. (2014). We tried to make them offer rehab, but they said, ‘no, no, no!’: Incentivizing private prison reform through the private prisoner rehabilitation credit. NYU Law Review, 89, 267–92.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programmes: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33, 15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rosnay, M. D., & Janssen, K. (2014). Legal and institutional challenges for opening data across public sectors: Towards common policy solutions. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 1–14. doi: 10.4067/S0718-18762014000300002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagles, P., Havitz, M., McCutcheon, B., Buteau-Duitschaever, W., & Glover, T. (2010). The perceived implications of an outsourcing model on governance within British Columbia provincial parks in Canada: A quantitative study. Environmental Management, 45, 1244–1256. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9477-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life.
   Google Scholar
• Edmiston, D., & Nicholls, A. (2017). Social Impact Bonds: The role of private capital in outcome-based commissioning. Journal of Social Policy, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A., Tan, S., Boaz, A., & Mays, N. B. (2020). Backing what works? Social impact bonds and evidence-informed policy and practice. Public Money & Management Same issue as this paper.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Hrsg.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, K., & Maurushat, A. (2017). Opening up government data for big data analysis and public benefit. Computer Law and Security Review, 33, 30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiujboom, N., & Van den Broek, T. (2011). Open Data: An international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management (ISM), 29, 258–268. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebman, J. (2016). Pay for success in the UK and the US. Oxford Government Review, 1, 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Trust in government. 156–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2015-50-en
   Google Scholar
• Pasi, G. (2014). Challenges for European welfare systems - a research agenda on social impact bonds. Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research, 8, 141.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR: Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis - into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raffel, J. A., Leisink, P., & Middlebrooks, A. E. (2009). Public sector leadership: International challenges and perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson David, Y., Harlan, Z., William, P., & Felten, E. W. (2009). Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 11, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Shadbolt, N., O’Hara, K., Berners-Lee, T., Gibbins, N., Glaser, H., & Hall, W. (2012). Linked open government data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27, 2–10. doi: 10.1109/MIS.2012.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Finance. (2018). Impact bond global database. Accessed Aug 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. (2013). Private finance for public goods: Social Impact Bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16, 303–319. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2013.835727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar