535
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Papers

Data for outcome payments or information for care? A sociotechnical analysis of the management information system in the implementation of a social impact bond

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all

References

  • Badham, R. J. (2005). Technology and the transformation of work. In S. Ackroyd, R. Batt, P. Thompson, & P. S. Tolbert (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization. Oxford University Press.
  • Carter, E. (2019). More than marketised? Exploring the governance and accountability mechanisms at play in Social Impact Bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2019.1575736
  • Dayson, C. (2017). Social prescribing ‘plus’: a model of asset-based collaborative innovation? People, Place and Policy. Retrieved from http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/17212
  • Dayson, C., Fraser, A., & Lowe, T. (2019). A comparative analysis of Social Impact Bond and conventional financing approaches to health service commissioning in England: The case of social prescribing. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1–17.
  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is Dead—Long Live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui057
  • Dunleavy, P., & Margetts, H. Z. (2010). The second wave of digital era governance. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1643850.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
  • Ellingsen, G., & Monteiro, E. (2003). A patchwork planet integration and cooperation in hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal, 12(1), 71–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1022469522932
  • Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Pettigrew, A., & Fitzgerald, L. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford University Press.
  • Fountain, J. E. (2001). Paradoxes of public sector customer service. Governance, 14(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00151
  • Fountain, J. E. (2002). Toward a theory of federal bureaucracy for the twenty-first century. Governance. Com: Democracy in the Information Age, 117–140.
  • Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M., & Mays, N. (2018). Narratives of promise, narratives of caution: A review of the literature on Social Impact Bonds. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 4–28. doi: 10.1111/spol.12260
  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8), 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  • Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29(4), 441–455. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.08.009
  • Grandon, E. E., & Pearson, J. M. (2004). Electronic commerce adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses. Information & Management, 42(1), 197–216. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.010
  • Heeks, R. (2005). e-Government as a carrier of context. Journal of Public Policy, 25(1), 51–74. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X05000206
  • Jenkings, N., & Wilson, R. (2007). The challenge of electronic health records (EHRs) design and implementation: responses of health workers to drawing a’big and rich picture'of a future EHR programme using animated tools. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, 15(2), 93–101. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v15i2.647
  • Lowe, T., Kimmitt, J., Wilson, R., Martin, M., & Gibbon, J. (2018). The institutional work of creating and implementing Social Impact Bonds. Policy & Politics.
  • Lowe, T., & Wilson, R. (2017). Playing the game of outcomes-based performance management. Is gamesmanship inevitable? Evidence from theory and practice. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), 981–1001. doi: 10.1111/spol.12205
  • MacKeith, J. (2011). The development of the outcomes star: a participatory approach to assessment and outcome measurement. Housing, Care and Support, 14(3), 98–106. doi: 10.1108/14608791111199778
  • MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1999). The social shaping of technology. eprints.lse.ac.uk.
  • McLoughlin, I. (1999). Creative technology change: The shaping of technology and organizations. London: Routledge.
  • McLoughlin, I., & Badham, R. (2005). Political process perspectives on organization and technological change. Human Relations; Studies towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 58(7), 827–843.
  • McLoughlin, I., Clark, J., & Wearne, S. (1995). Technological change at work (2nd edn). International Journal of Project Management, 13(4), 271. doi: 10.1016/0263-7863(95)90037-3
  • McLoughlin, I., & Wilson, R. (2013). Digital government at work: A social informatics perspective. Oxford: OUP.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. California: Sage Publications.
  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2009). The sociomateriality of organizational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 125–141. doi: 10.1093/cje/bep058
  • Sinclair, S., McHugh, N., & Roy, M. J. (2019). Social innovation, financialisation and commodification: a critique of social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2019.1571415
  • Tan, S., Fraser, A., McHugh, N., & Warner, M. (2019). Widening perspectives on social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 1–10. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2019.1568249
  • Warner, M. E. (2013). Private interest in public finance: social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4), 303–319. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2013.835727
  • Williams, R., & Pollock, N. (2008). Software and organizations: The biography of the enterprise-wide system or how SAP conquered the world. 5.
  • Wilson, R., Baines, S., Martin, M., Richter, P., McLoughlin, I., & Maniatopoulos, G. (2017). Who is telecaring whom? Exploring the total social organization of care work in an Italian municipality. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 268–282. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12101

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.