Everybody wins? A discourse analysis of competing stakeholder expectations in Social Impact Bonds

References

• Arena, M., Bengo, I., Calderini, M., & Chiodo, V. (2016). Social impact bonds: Blockbuster or flash in a pan? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 927–939. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2015.1057852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S., & Vaara, E. (2014). Placing strategy discourse in context: Sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 175–201. doi: 10.1111/joms.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengo, I., & Calderini, M. (2016). New development: Are social impact bonds (SIBs) viable in Italy? A new roadmap. Public Money & Management, 36(4), 303–306. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1162999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9-10), 749–765. doi: 10.1081/PAD-200067320
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C., Graham, C., & Himick, D. (2016). Social impact bonds: The securitization of the homeless. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 55, 63–82. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, C., & Gibbon, J. (2018). New development: Private finance over public good? Questioning the value of impact bonds. Public Money & Management, 38(5), 375–378. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1477676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, E. (2017). In the wake of austerity: Social impact bonds and the financialisation of the welfare state in Britain. New Political Economy, 22(3), 294–310. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1232709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmiston, D., & Nicholls, A. (2018). Social Impact Bonds: The role of private capital in outcome-based commissioning. Journal of Social Policy, 47(1), 57–76. doi: 10.1017/S0047279417000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013a). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of Language. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013b). Critical discourse and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2013.798239
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C., & Albertson, K. (2011). Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: New challenges for the concept of evidence-based policy? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 11(5), 395–413. doi: 10.1177/1748895811415580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M., & Mays, N. (2018). Narratives of promise, narratives of caution: A review of the literature on Social Impact Bonds. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 4–28. doi: 10.1111/spol.12260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. doi: 10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., & Thomas, R. (2014). Strategy, discourse and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 320–348. doi: 10.1111/joms.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. T. (2013). Evaluating social impact bonds: Questions, challenges, innovations, and possibilities in measuring outcomes in impact investing. Community Development, 44(5), 608–616. doi: 10.1080/15575330.2013.854258
   Google Scholar
• Joy, M., & Shields, J. (2018). Austerity in the making: Reconfiguring social policy through social impact bonds. Policy & Politics. Online First.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebman, J., & Sellman, A. (2013). Social impact bonds. A guide for State and local governments. Harvard Kennedy School & Social Impact Bond Technical Assistance Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, T., & Wilson, R. (2015). Playing the Game of outcomes-based performance management. Is Gamesmanship inevitable? Evidence from theory and practice. Social Policy & Administration.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, F., Barbetta, G. P., & Godina, F. (2017). Paradoxes of social impact bonds. Social Policy & Administration. Online First.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2017). Social Impact Bonds and the perils of aligned interests. Administrative Sciences, 7(3), 24. doi: 10.3390/admsci7030024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, G. (2000). Metaphor, morality and myth: A critical discourse analysis of public housing policy in Queensland. Critical Social Policy, 20(3), 349–373. doi: 10.1177/026101830002000305
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Moran, M. J. (2018). Social enterprise and policy discourse: A comparative analysis of the United Kingdom and Australia. Policy & Politics, 46(4), 607–626. doi: 10.1332/030557317X15133530312516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, N., Sinclair, S., Roy, M., Huckfield, L., & Donaldson, C. (2013). Social impact bonds: A wolf in sheep's clothing? Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 21(3), 247–257. doi: 10.1332/204674313X13812372137921
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D. (2007, June). Reinventing government: What a difference a strategy makes. In 7th global forum on reinventing government: Building trust in government (pp. 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Reading MA. Adison Wesley Public Comp.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social constructionism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L., Hughes, D., & Peckham, S. (2012). The discursive turn in policy analysis and the validation of policy stories. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 271–289. doi: 10.1017/S0047279411000821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, M. J., McHugh, N., & Sinclair, S. (2017). 14. Social impact bonds–evidence-based policy or ideology? . Handbook of Social Policy Evaluation, 263.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2017). New development: Performance promises and pitfalls in hybrid organizations—five challenges for managers and researchers. Public Money & Management, 37(6), 425–430. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1344023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2011). On the narrative construction of multinational corporations: An antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger. Organization Science, 22(2), 370–390. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. (2013). Private finance for public goods: Social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4), 303–319. doi: 10.1080/17487870.2013.835727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2000). Recontextualization and the transformation of meanings: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in EU meetings about employment policies. Discourse and Social Life, 185–206.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (eds.). (2009). Methods for critical discourse analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar