https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-4453
References
- Agostino, D., & Arnaboldi, M. (2017). Rational and ritualistic use of key performance indicators in hybrid organizations. Public Money and Management, 37(6), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1344021
- Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. NewYork, NY: Routledge.
- Klijn, E. H., Steijn, B., & Edelenbos, J. (2010). The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Administration, 88(4), 1063–1082. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01826.x
- Koliba, C. J., Meek, J. W., & Zia, A. (2011). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. Routledge.
- Kvilvang, N., Bjurström, E., & Almqvist, R. (2019). Making sense of complexity in governance : The case of local public management in the city of Stockholm. Policy Studies, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1577372
- Mcguire, M., & Fyall, R. (2014). Policy energy and public management networks. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 1(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.7564/14-CGN6
- Vakkuri, J., & Johanson, J. E. (2018). Debate: Taming the monster— understanding hybrid organizations and governance. Public Money and Management, 38(3), 162–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1434306
- Zia, A., Kauffman, S., Koliba, C., Beckage, B., Vattay, G., & Bomblies, A. (2014). From the habit of control to institutional enablement: Re-envisioning the governance of social-ecological systems from the perspective of complexity sciences. Complexity, Governance & Networks, 1(1), 79–88.