Public procurement transaction costs: a country-level assessment

References

• Arrow, K. J. (1969). The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarket allocation. The analysis and evaluation of public expenditure: The PPB system, 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Balaeva, O., & Yakovlev, A. (2017). Estimation of costs in the Russian public procurement system. International Journal of Procurement Management, 10(1), 70–88.
   Google Scholar
• Butter, F. A. G. d. (2012). The transaction management perspective on procurement in the era of globalization. International Journal of Procurement Management, 5(2), 123–139.
   Google Scholar
• Büchner, S., Freytag, A., González, L. G., & Güth, W. (2008). Bribery and public procurement: An experimental study. Public Choice, 137(1–2), 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., Fanti, M. P., & Iacobellis, G. (2006). Evaluating the total cost of purchasing via probabilistic and fuzzy reasoning. Fuzzy Economic Review, 11(1), 69–92.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., Fanti, M. P., & Iacobellis, G. (2009). A decision support system framework for purchasing management in supply chains. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(3/4), 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantino, N., Dotoli, M., Falagario, M., & Sciancalepore, F. (2012). Balancing the additional costs of purchasing and the vendor set dimension to reduce public procurement costs. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18(3), 189–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufek, L. (2013). Measuring private transaction costs of public procurement: Case of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(2), 317–325.
   Google Scholar
• Erridge, A. (2007). Public procurement, public value and the Northern Ireland unemployment pilot project. Public Administration, 85(4), 1023–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). New EU public procurement reform: Less bureaucracy, higher efficiency. 19 November 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=8562.
   Google Scholar
• Gardenal, F. (2013). A model to measure e-procurement impacts on organizational performance. Journal of Public Procurement, 13(2), 215–242.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, M. (2008). Private ex-ante transaction costs for repeated biodiversity conservation auctions: A case study. Working Paper Series in Economics, University of Lüneburg, 84, May.
   Google Scholar
• International working group on Administrative Burdens. (2004). The Standard Cost Model. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/64157/4374310/11-STANDARD-COST-MODEL-DK-SE-NO-BE-UK-NL-2004-EN-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jasko, O., Jovanovic, P., & Cudanov, M. (2015). Cost efficiency of public procurement at local level: Chances for improvement of local self-government and public enterprises in Serbia. Lex Localis, 13(3), 789–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1991). Auction design and favoritism. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1), 9–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Development. (2016). Report on the results of monitoring the implementation of Federal Law No. 44-FL of April 5, 2013 ‘On the Contract System in State and Municipal Procurement of Goods, Works and Services’ for 2016. (In Russian.).
   Google Scholar
• Moszoro, M., Spiller, P. T., & Stolorz, S. (2016). Rigidity of public contracts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(3), 396–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moszoro, M. W., & Spiller, P. T. (2018). Political contestability and public contracting. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 21(5), 945–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Corruption in public procurement. https://www.oecd.org/governance/procurement/toolbox/search/towards-e-procurement-russian-federation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pavel, J. (2018). Soukromé transakční náklady zadávání veřejných zakázek a faktory ovlivňující jejich výši [Private transaction costs of procurement and factors affecting their value]. Politická Ekonomie, 66(1), 20–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickernell, D., Kay, A., Packham, G., & Miller, C. (2011). Competing agendas in public procurement: An empirical analysis of opportunities and limits in the UK for SMEs. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(4), 641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaček, M., Ochrana, F., Schmidt, M., Nemec, J., & Půček, M. (2020). The factors causing delays in public procurement: The Czech Republic versus the UK. Public Money & Management, 40(2), 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PwC. (2011). Public procurement in Europe: Cost and effectiveness. PricewaterhouseCoopers. A Study on Procurement Regulation Prepared for the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Saussier, S., & Tirole, J. (2015). Strengthening the efficiency of public procurement. Notes du Conseil D’analyse Économique, 3, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Konstantinidis, G., Roubik, E., & Beffermann, E. (2009). Does e-procurement save the state money? Journal of Public Procurement, 9(1), 58–76.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, J. J., & North, D. C. (1986). Measuring the transaction sector in the American economy, 1870-1970. In S. L. Engerman, & R. E. Gallman (Eds.), Long-term factors in American economic growth. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. firms, markets, relational contracting. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2006). Country procurement assessment report. Russian Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Yakovlev, A., Balaeva, O., & Tkachenko, A. (2018). Estimation of procurement costs incurred by public customers: A case study of a Russian region. Journal of Public Procurement, 18(1), 68–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakovlev, A., Demidova, O., & Balaeva, O. (2013). Empirical analysis of suppliers’ nonperformance risks in execution of public procurement contracts in Russia. In G. Albano, K. Snider, & K. Thai (Eds.), Charting a course in public procurement innovation and knowledge sharing. PrAcademics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, J., Knight, L., Harland, C., Humby, S., & James, K. (2007). An analysis of research into the future of purchasing and supply management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(1), 69–83.
   Google Scholar